Critics’ reviews

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 82: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

82
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics regard The Treasure of the Sierra Madre as a forceful study of greed, with praise centred on John Huston’s writing and direction and the performances of Humphrey Bogart and Walter Huston. Bogart’s portrayal of suspicion and moral deterioration draws particular attention, while Walter Huston’s philosophical prospector earns approval even from a sceptical review. The location shooting and convincing atmosphere also feature repeatedly, giving the adventure the realism that admirers find essential to its treatment of human weakness.

The disagreement concerns how much the film has to say about greed, and how persuasively it says it. The New Yorker finds the message simplistic and the direction sluggish, though it praises Walter Huston; Time Out sees pretension getting in the way of an enjoyable yarn. The spread is therefore broad: most find the drama searching and honest, while dissenters question its seriousness and pacing.

Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
90*

The critic hails the film as a brilliant and sobering study of avarice, crediting John Huston with coaxing outstanding performances from the cast in a gritty location-shot production. Bogart's turn as the corrupted prospector is singled out as one of his most effective.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 October 2003 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert praises the film's exploration of greed and character through adventure, highlighting Walter Huston's masterful performance as the wise prospector and Bogart's fearless portrayal of a man descending into madness. He singles out the stark realism and honesty in the closing scenes as bringing the story to truth.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 January 1948 · Herm Schoenfeld
90*

Schoenfeld hails the film as a distinguished and radically different achievement with compelling honesty and powerful authenticity from location shooting and realistic focus. He singles out the grim ironic twist at the end and the superbly balanced cast, especially Walter Huston's energetic performance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 January 1948 · Bosley Crowther
85*

Crowther lauds the film's originality, maturity, and ruthless realism in depicting greed with ironic contempt, crediting Huston's direction and script for a searching drama. He singles out Bogart's performance as his best and most substantial, noting the vivid and exciting action display.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 January 1948 · John McCarten
45*

McCarten finds the film's simple message on greed unconvincing and its direction disappointing and moping compared to Huston's earlier work, despite authentic atmosphere. He singles out Walter Huston's convincing performance as the philosophical prospector for praise amid otherwise uneven execution.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 October 2010 · Rob Humanick

The critic calls the film one of the most insightful ever made about greed and the effects of temptation on human nature, praising its universal indictment of the profit motive and strong performances, especially Bogart's portrayal of a man destroyed by paranoia.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · SG

Bogart plays a vicious bastard in this lifeboat-style drama of three prospectors; Huston aims for fable-like eloquence about gold lust but ends up pretentious. A quite enjoyable yarn is buried under the hollow laughter.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
10 March 2013 · ★★★★★ · Tony Sokol
100

The critic praises the film as a classic tale of greed and an indictment of capitalism, highlighting its personal story of three men corrupted by gold fever told with humor and adventure. He singles out the strong performances, especially Humphrey Bogart's portrayal of the infected everyman Dobbs and the natural interplay among the cast.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 October 2010 · Rob Vaux

The review praises the film as an indisputable classic and highlights Humphrey Bogart's sympathetic portrayal of the flawed Fred C. Dobbs alongside Walter Huston's Oscar-winning performance. It notes the film's exploration of greed and human nature through its strong direction and writing by John Huston.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate