Critics’ reviews

The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1988)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 70: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Unbearable Lightness of Being

70
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics find Kaufman’s adaptation comes off far better than a novel this hard to film has any right to. The praise clusters on the cast: Juliette Binoche and Lena Olin are singled out more than once, and several reviews admire how the film moves between erotic comedy and political tragedy without lurching. The actors’ body language and the editing of the final moments are also picked out as things the film does that the page could not.

The reservations are about the book. Several critics feel the film cannot carry the novel’s language or its irony, and that what remains is heavier than the source. Daniel Day-Lewis divides opinion: Variety finds his self-conscious appeal occasionally overdone, while Empire thinks him the best of the casting. Radio Times calls it overlong and eventually short of things to say. The spread is wide, with the Los Angeles Times the one outright dissenter, arguing the adaptation thins the ideas and leaves the characters shallow, though even that review admires Binoche and the photography.

The AV Club
21 February 2006 · Keith Phipps
85*

Phipps praises the film as a thoughtful, moving adaptation whose final moments achieve a remarkable effect through editing. He also singles out the performances’ expressive body language and the film’s handling of intimacy and historical upheaval.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 February 1988 · Pauline Kael
82*

Kael finds the film a playful, emotionally resonant adaptation, though its ending is weakened by the novel’s pull toward conventionality. She praises the actors’ lively performances and the film’s deft blend of erotic comedy and political tragedy.

Read the full review →
Time Out
28 March 2012
80*

The review finds Kaufman’s adaptation remarkably successful despite the novel’s challenges. It singles out his ability to translate the book’s essayistic pondering to the screen.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1987 · Variety Staff
80*

The critic calls the adaptation richly satisfying and praises its buoyant, spirited treatment of sexuality. They single out Juliette Binoche and Lena Olin as enchanting, while finding Daniel Day-Lewis occasionally overdoes his self-conscious appeal.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 March 2006 · Colin Kennedy
70*

Kennedy finds the adaptation strong overall despite its inability to capture the novel’s language and its less successful blend of political themes. He praises the casting, especially Daniel Day-Lewis, and compares the film favorably with Kubrick’s Lolita.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its praise or complaints cannot be determined from the blocked content.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
60

The review finds the film overlong and eventually short of important things to say. It praises the atmosphere of a besieged culture, but says that cannot make up for the film’s length.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 February 1988 · Sheila Benson
35*

Benson finds the film an ambitious but ultimately over-heavy adaptation that thins the novel’s ideas and irony. She praises Juliette Binoche’s affecting performance and the evocative cinematography, while faulting the shallow characterization.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate