The reviews are warm and broadly agreed. Most critics find Joachim Trier’s film funny, tender and wistful, and nearly all of them put Renate Reinsve at the centre of their praise, calling her performance the reason Julie’s mistakes never turn the audience against her. Anders Danielsen Lie’s Aksel draws the next largest share of attention, several critics naming his later scenes as the film’s most moving. The sequence in which time stops as Julie runs through Oslo is picked out more than once.
The reservations are about the final stretch. Several critics, IndieWire and Deadline among them, feel the last act turns tidier and more conventional than the fragmented storytelling before it. Sight and Sound questions how indulgent the film is towards Julie. The one real dissent comes from The i Paper, which finds the film cold and its romanticising of indecision tired, while still admiring Reinsve. The spread is otherwise narrow.
R
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Max Copeman
100
Copeman finds the film wistful, warm and deeply affecting. He singles out Renate Reinsve’s charismatic, relatable performance as the reason Julie’s mistakes never make her seem villainous.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
8 July 2021 · ★★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
100
Bradshaw calls the film a tender, funny and beguiling romantic coming-of-age story, an instant classic. He especially praises Renate Reinsve’s sensitive, sympathetic performance and says it makes her a star.
Read the full review →E
Empire
21 March 2022 · Ella Kemp
95*
Kemp calls the film a truthful, tender masterpiece and finds its portrayal of love and growing up deeply affecting. She especially praises Renate Reinsve’s tour-de-force performance and the film’s naturalistic, wise script.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
festival review · Hannah Strong
90*
The critic calls the film a sweet, funny, keenly observed character study and suggests it could become a future classic. She particularly praises the central trio’s chemistry and the film’s sharp, truthful dialogue.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
3 February 2022 · Justin Chang
90*
Chang finds the film charming, wistful and tender, praising its empathetic portrayal of Julie’s changing sense of self. He singles out Renate Reinsve’s thrilling, quicksilver performance as the film’s center of gravity.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
15 July 2021 · ★★★½/4 · Pat Brown
88
The critic sees the film as a lively, affecting restoration of the romantic comedy that makes familiar themes feel significant again. Renate Reinsve’s nuanced performance is singled out for giving Julie a sense of depth and subjectivity.
Read the full review →V
Variety
8 July 2021 · Critics Pick · Guy Lodge
85*
Lodge calls the film a lovely, wise paean to unrest and indecision. He especially praises Renate Reinsve’s fluid performance and the fragile chemistry she shares with Anders Danielsen Lie.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
3 February 2022 · Angelica Jade Bastién
85*
Bastién finds the film piercingly observant, openhearted, and emotionally rich. She especially praises Renate Reinsve’s layered performance and Anders Danielsen Lie’s moving portrayal of Aksel.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
3 February 2022 · B+ · A.A. Dowd
83
Dowd finds the film an exciting, stylish portrait of the confusion and choices of adulthood. He praises Renate Reinsve’s performance and the tender, well-written romantic scenes, while noting that one drug-trip sequence misses the mark.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
25 March 2022 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80
O'Sullivan finds the film occasionally aggravating but ultimately profound and magical. She especially praises Renate Reinsve's expressive performance and the film's playful, earthy humor.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
8 July 2021 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80
The critic presents the film as a lively, energetic portrait of a woman searching for meaning. They single out Renate Reinsve as a revelation.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
8 July 2021 · B · David Ehrlich
77
Ehrlich finds the film vibrant and engaging, though its final act feels less compelling and overly conclusive. He especially praises Renate Reinsve’s nuanced performance and the sequence where time stops as Julie runs through Oslo.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
2 February 2022 · Anthony Lane
75*
Lane finds the film beautiful, funny, and moving, though sometimes annoying, with sadness that lingers after the story ends. He especially praises its formal inventiveness in mirroring Julie’s unsettled search for freedom and identity.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
9 July 2021 · festival review · Wendy Ide
70*
Ide presents Trier’s film as a bold Palme d’Or contender. The standfirst singles out his willingness to throw caution to the wind and the film’s place as the final part of his Oslo trilogy.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
8 July 2021 · festival review · Jordan Mintzer
70*
Mintzer finds the film a compelling, melancholy return to form, though its stylistic flourishes can feel showy. He particularly praises the emotionally powerful reconciliation between Julie and Aksel, carried by Anders Danielsen Lie’s performance.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
22 March 2022
65*
The critic finds the film a supple, fleeting delight, while questioning its indulgence toward Julie and its narrow perspective. Reinsve’s finely observed, effervescent performance is singled out for praise.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
25 March 2022 · Christina Newland
35*
Newland finds the film’s portrait of modern love and alienation ultimately cold and its romanticisation of uncertainty tired. She praises Renate Reinsve’s radiant, physically expressive performance as Julie.
Read the full review →C
Collider
11 February 2022 · A+ · Ross Bonaime
100
Bonaime calls the film a near-perfect, moving coming-of-age story and a phenomenal statement on life and love. He especially praises Renate Reinsve’s performance and Trier’s inventive way of depicting Julie’s inner life.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
21 March 2022 · ★★★★★ · Philip Concannon
100
The review finds the film dynamic, funny and ultimately empathetic, with a wistful turn in its second half. It especially praises Anders Danielsen Lie’s moving performance as Aksel.
Read the full review →/
/Film
3 February 2022 · 8.5/10 · Hoai-Tran Bui
85
The critic finds the film a warm, melancholic anti-romantic comedy, though its fragmented portrait can feel emotionally distant. She especially praises Renate Reinsve’s performance and Anders Danielsen Lie’s shattering turn.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
festival review · Jo-Ann Titmarsh
85*
The critic finds the film warm, intelligent, and consistently engaging, with a strong lead performance. She especially praises Renate Reinsve’s portrayal of Julie and highlights the film’s inventive visual sequences.
Read the full review →P
Paste
4 February 2022 · 8.0/10 · Brianna Zigler
80
Zigler finds the film invigorating and exceedingly kind, though its late turn feels too tidy for its fragmented storytelling. She especially praises Renate Reinsve’s gentle, sharp performance as Julie.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
9 July 2021 · festival review
80*
The critic finds the film charming, appealing, and full of unfolding delights. They especially praise Renate Reinsve’s standout performance and the film’s lively depiction of Oslo.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
30 January 2022 · Anne-Katrin Titze
75*
The critic finds the film beautifully constructed, balancing identity-seeking with the sense that each life is one link in a longer chain. She singles out its lingering melancholy beneath the funny, fast-paced moments of everyday chaos.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
9 July 2021 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
70*
McCarthy finds the film sharp and poignant, though it loses some edge and becomes more conventional in its latter stretch. He praises Renate Reinsve’s vibrant performance and the inventive, intimate scenes that capture life’s fleeting moments.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
9 July 2021 · festival review
64*
The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate