Critics’ reviews

The Young and the Damned (1950)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 70: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Young and the Damned

70
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics praise The Young and the Damned for its unsentimental treatment of poverty and juvenile crime in Mexico City, and for refusing comforting explanations or easy solutions. The praise centres on Buñuel’s direction: the combination of harsh social realism, surreal imagery and a dream sequence that several reviews single out. Supporters find the brutality purposeful, exposing how neglect damages children. Visual style draws more attention than acting, though Den of Geek singles out Roberto Cobo’s performance as Jaibo.

The spread is wide despite seven of the nine reviews being positive. Reservations range from weaker subplots to objections to the film’s whole approach. The two negative reviews, both from 1952, reject what admirers find powerful: The New Yorker finds the brutality excessive and emotionally unproductive, while The New York Times sees violence, melodrama and coincidence without a clear focus. The central disagreement is over whether the unrelenting suffering deepens the film’s social criticism or blunts its effect.

Empire
14 June 2006 · David Parkinson
90*

The critic praises Buñuel's potent exposé of depravity in the slums, which takes neo-realism into surrealist territory and refuses easy solutions or judgment. The film is described as a shattering indictment of social indifference that retains its original power.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 October 1991 · Mark Chalon Smith
90*

Buñuel’s early masterpiece is operatic in its tragedy yet steadfast in its realism, a retort to hopeful movies that presented juvenile delinquency as easily overcome by love and sentiment. Poverty is shown as a dehumanizing cycle, with the film attacking the sadness that ruins children before they have a chance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 February 2007 · Nick Funnell
90*

The critic praises the film's defiant lack of sentimentality in depicting the brutal lives of Mexico City street kids and its blend of neorealism with Buñuel's surrealist elements, especially a memorable dream sequence. It is called a masterpiece that powerfully exposes social and individual ills without offering easy resolutions.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 February 2007
80*

Buñuel's 1950 film, restored for a NFT season, is a rough-and-ready portrait of street kids in Mexico City that stands out for its metaphysical and surreal dimensions beyond mere social realism. The critic highlights the famous dream sequence and poetic flourishes as what make it riveting.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 May 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
70*

The critic praises Buñuel's objective, unsentimental portrayal of Mexico City street children and the film's intense focus on isolation and societal neglect. He singles out the director's powerful visual style, including a memorable mock bullfight sequence and a disturbing dream scene, for heightening the emotional impact.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1949 · Variety Staff
70*

The film is an objective, unrelenting closeup of life among delinquents in a Mexican slum, with no hope offered except through sweeping social changes. Buñuel has filled the picture with symbols like a terrifying blind man and bloody battles, aided by strong contrasty cinematography.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 March 1952
30*

The film grapples with juvenile delinquency but the point that poverty and lack of love can reduce people to criminal despair is debatable, with too much brutality leaving little to the imagination. The atmosphere is so realistic that it startles without provoking the emotional response the effort deserves.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 March 1952
30*

A brutal and unrelenting picture of poverty and juvenile crime in the slums of Mexico City is presented, assembled into a vicious and shocking melange of violence, melodrama, coincidence and irony. The director had no clear focus or point of reference for the squalid, depressing tale.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
11 October 2010 · ★★★★ · Joseph Ewens
80

The critic praises the film's enduring power as a punchy drama with real depth, highlighting the strong performances, especially Roberto Cobo as Jaibo, and the surreal dream sequence, while noting some weaker subplots.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate