Critics’ reviews

Thunderbolts* (2025)

25 reviews from 25 publications. Critics’ score 72: 12 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Thunderbolts*

72
Positive
12
Mixed
4
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80

Celebrates the return to form with action, thrills, and melancholy as the team grapples with grief; director blends spectacle and character focus effectively.

Read the full review →
The Observer
3 May 2025 · Wendy Ide
80*

Florence Pugh has saved Marvel in this stripped-down, toned-up throwback to an earlier era of Marvel movies. Director Jake Schreier proves an inspired choice with a darker, more grounded vision and bruising action sequences.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 April 2025 · B · Jesse Hassenger
77

The review praises the film's refreshing lack of firepower and focus on character interiority over spectacle, crediting Schreier and the cast for reinvigorating the MCU. Pugh is highlighted as anchoring the story with real human feeling amid themes of depression and inadequacy.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 May 2025 · Brian Tallerico
75*

The film mostly works as an odd duck of a superhero movie that leans into MCU fatigue and might help straighten it out. It offers richer acting than recent entries and an emotionally grounded final act, though the first act is weak and action choreography lacks shine.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
29 April 2025
75*

Notes the film's modest approach and thoughtful look at addiction, abuse, and mental illness; performances suggest Marvel can still tell compelling stories despite franchise fatigue.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 April 2025
75*

Florence Pugh is the most impressive member of a ragtag Suicide Squad-esque team in an often charmingly unusual yet still baggy adventure. The film is messy with clumsily forced narrative beats and tonal shifts but gets the job done as the best Marvel entry since WandaVision.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 April 2025 · Manohla Dargis
65*

The results are fitfully amusing, sometimes touching and resolutely formulaic. Florence Pugh is the best thing to happen to Marvel in a while, giving her weary Yelena an ironic sensibility that deepens the material.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 April 2025 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60

Praises the bold exploration of mental health and trauma in a team-up film, with strong cast chemistry and snarky banter, but notes it requires prior MCU knowledge. Calls it a cut above recent entries.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 April 2025 · Peter Debruge
60*

It balances self-deprecating comedy with an earnest allegory about facing personal trauma and mental illness. The film dragged until the Void sequence, then felt like a modestly budgeted supernatural thriller about tormented characters saved by troubled friends.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 May 2025 · Amy Nicholson
50*

Marvel’s jokey, moody and middling film sets expectations low and meets them. It is a teenaged-feeling, depressive and defiant spinoff that mocks itself before critics can, anchored by Pugh’s compelling performance as a sullen, bored assassin.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 April 2025 · John Nugent

The critic finds the film dares to be different as a ragtag anti-hero team-up with human moments and found-family themes among the action. It praises subtle performances (especially Pugh) and an internal resolution but notes uneven humor and a washed-out tone with mixed handling of mental-health elements.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
29 April 2025 · ★★★★☆

Florence Pugh is the real marvel in this MCU entry featuring a mix of disconsolate also-rans who unite against an evil CIA boss. It comes within an inch of being the Barbie of the MCU with a rare note of downbeat realism.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
2 May 2025 · Kim Newman

The critic praises the film's focus on character depth and emotional themes over spectacle, highlighting Florence Pugh's performance and the fresh premise of antiheroes. It notes the group hug climax as a rare emotional touch in the MCU.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 April 2025 · David Rooney

The critic finds the film a gratifyingly fresh and soulful Marvel adventure with a distinctive take on the genre from director Jake Schreier. Pugh's performance as Yelena is singled out for its depth and emotional fragility amid the team's dysfunctional outsider dynamic.

Read the full review →
The Times
29 April 2025 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher

This is the superhero film we needed, refreshingly devoid of CGI spectacle and focusing on the impact of poor mental health. It suggests the problems of the world can’t be solved by a super-powered punch but by a heartfelt group hug.

Read the full review →
Total Film
29 April 2025 · Emily Garbutt

The review highlights how the film makes good on the promise of a new start for the MCU through its fresh tone and emotional depth. It singles out strong character work and a shift toward more grounded, human-focused storytelling amid the superhero elements.

Read the full review →
Vulture
29 April 2025

The critic calls it Marvel’s answer to an A24 movie, a pretty good film that turns C-lister anti-heroes into an asset through strong performances and emotional depth. Pugh's raw portrayal of unhappiness and the cast's chemistry are singled out as making the story feel solid and character-driven.

Read the full review →
Polygon
29 April 2025 · Austen Goslin
85*

The critic says Marvel is getting back to the basics of comedy, action, and actual characters with no multiverses or heavy CGI, praising the charming cast and chemistry. They note it sits comfortably among the franchise’s best films and is the first good MCU movie in a long time that cares about story and characters.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
29 April 2025 · Ian Sandwell
82*

The critic calls it a terrific MCU throwback that focuses on characters and fun rather than wider concerns, with strong ensemble chemistry and emotional depth that could make fans fall in love with Marvel again.

Read the full review →
Collider
29 April 2025 · 8/10 · Ross Bonaime
80

The critic calls it a surprisingly emotional and restrained MCU film that is still a lot of fun and one of the most enjoyable since Endgame. They single out the focus on character dynamics and the balance of darker themes with lighter tone and action.

Read the full review →
NME
29 April 2025 · ★★★★ · Nick Levine
80

The critic hails the hilarious caper tone and aggy antiheroes that make Marvel fun again, praising the consistent blend of thrills, humor, set-pieces and emotional depth as the most enjoyable MCU film in years.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 April 2025 · ★★★½ · David Crow
70

The critic praises the winsome ensemble led by Florence Pugh and the film's shaggy, hang-out vibe as a refreshing MCU entry with emotional depth on depression and a soul, though the direction is merely workmanlike.

Read the full review →
/Film
29 April 2025 · 7/10 · BJ Colangelo
70

The critic calls it one of the best MCU films for its emotional depth, human story of antiheroes confronting trauma and mental health, and strong ensemble performances, especially Florence Pugh as the emotional anchor. It blends humor with serious themes without sacrificing story but is not flawless.

Read the full review →
Deadline
29 April 2025 · Pete Hammond

The critic finds the film a fun, character-focused origin story for Marvel's anti-heroes that prioritizes human elements like trust and identity over heavy CGI. The smart script and strong ensemble performances are singled out as strengths.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
29 April 2025 · William Bibbiani

The critic sees the film as a welcome, grounded MCU entry about working-class has-beens that focuses on character and consequences rather than cameos or set-ups. Pugh's performance and the ensemble's relatable issues are highlighted as particular strengths.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate