All seven reviews are positive, and most of the praise goes the same way: Albert Finney’s Tom, the high spirits of Richardson’s direction, and the film’s willingness to be bawdy. Critics return to the ensemble, the Somerset settings and the colour photography, and to particular set pieces, the eating scene between Finney and Joyce Redman above all. The reviews from 1963 are the warmest, treating the film as a daring leap rather than a costume drama.
The reservations cluster around technique. Variety finds the camera tricks and editing occasionally disconcerting, and Empire, writing decades later, thinks the nouvelle vague borrowings now date the film. The later reviews are generally cooler, calling it watchable and entertaining rather than remarkable, though Eye for Film is an exception, still taken with its chaotic energy. The spread is narrow: nobody dislikes it, and the argument is only about how much of the boisterousness still lands.
