Film review

Tom Jones

1963 · Directed by Tony Richardson · 2h 08m · MPA NR

In a sentenceEighteenth-century bed-hopping filmed by people who had just discovered the jump cut and were pleased about it

ComedyRomanceHistory

Somerset, in the middle of the eighteenth century. A baby is found in the bed of a kindly country squire, who names him Tom and raises him as his own beside his sour legitimate nephew, Blifil (David Warner). Tom (Albert Finney) grows into a handsome, good-natured young man who cannot keep his hands off anyone, least of all Molly Seagrim (Diane Cilento), the gamekeeper’s daughter. The one he loves is Sophie Western (Susannah York), daughter of the neighbouring Squire Western (Hugh Griffith), a red-faced drunk who lives for the hunt and wants her married to Blifil. Sophie’s aunt, Miss Western (Edith Evans), has plans for her too. When Tom’s enemies turn the squire against him, he is thrown out with nothing and takes to the road.

Fi1m review

Tony Richardson takes Fielding’s 1749 novel and films it as though the eighteenth century were a party he had just crashed. It is lively, often funny and beautifully lit by Walter Lassally, and it runs out of puff in London.

Tony Richardson had spent four years filming bedsits: Look Back in Anger, A Taste of Honey, The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner. Then he and John Osborne, who wrote the angriest of those plays, took Henry Fielding’s 1749 novel about a foundling who cannot keep out of other people’s beds and made the noisiest costume film of its decade. It is a good one. It is funny, handsome and full of life for ninety minutes, and then it goes to London and slows to a walk, so that 128 minutes feel like rather more.

The idea is to film the eighteenth century as if nobody had told the cast it was over. Richardson opens with a silent-comedy prologue, intertitles and all, with John Addison’s harpsichord rattling underneath. After that come wipes, freeze frames, chases run at double speed and a narrator who keeps interrupting. Albert Finney turns to the camera to complain about a woman, and at one point puts his hat over the lens. Antony Gibbs cuts it fast and loose. For an hour this is a pleasure, because the book is a shaggy, digressive thing and the film has found a way to be shaggy back. After that it is a habit.

Walter Lassally is the reason it is not merely a stunt. He shoots real Somerset houses in what looks like real daylight, so the rooms are dim, the fields are muddy and the colour sits somewhere between a watercolour and a wet dog. Ralph W. Brinton’s production design leaves the dirt in, and John McCorry’s wigs sit crooked on hot heads. Then comes the hunt, shot from horseback with a hand-held camera, hounds and horses and men going flat out across the country and a stag brought down at the end of it. We were shaken, and we did not see it coming. The comedy stops for five minutes and the century looks like what it was, cruel and loud and enjoying itself.

Finney plays Tom as a man who means well every single time, and he is so likeable that the film never has to argue his case. His best scene is at the inn at Upton, where he and Joyce Redman’s Mrs. Waters sit across a table and eat at each other: oysters, a chicken leg, a pear, no dialogue, faces doing all of it. Richardson, for once, stops cutting and lets it run. We laughed out loud, then laughed again at how long it went on. Diane Cilento’s Molly Seagrim is warm and dirty-kneed early on, and Lynn Redgrave gets a good few minutes as a maid at the same inn.

Around Finney the cast know exactly how big to play. Hugh Griffith’s Squire Western is the largest: purple, drunk, roaring at his dogs and falling off things. Edith Evans, as his sister, purses her lips at the whole county and gets a laugh every time she opens her mouth. Susannah York has the hardest job, playing the one sane person, and does it with a straight back and a good deal of patience. David Warner’s Blifil is a thin, pious sneak, and Joan Greenwood arrives late as Lady Bellaston and purrs every line.

London is where it goes wrong. Fielding’s last third is thick with plot, and Osborne keeps most of it: Lady Bellaston, David Tomlinson’s Lord Fellamar, a masquerade and a duel. A film that had been leaping from field to field now has to explain things, and the tricks that carried the country scenes cannot carry exposition. Some critics writing since have called the film dated. We would put it another way: the jokes have held up and the camera has not. A speeded-up chase was daring once; now it is the part you sit through.

Beside Richardson’s own kitchen-sink films this is the one with the most life in it, and beside most costume pictures it is one of the few where anyone looks as if they might sweat. Watch it for the first hour and a half and forgive what follows. And do not eat first.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

All seven reviews are positive, and most of the praise goes the same way: Albert Finney’s Tom, the high spirits of Richardson’s direction, and the film’s willingness to be bawdy. Critics return to the ensemble, the Somerset settings and the colour photography, and to particular set pieces, the eating scene between Finney and Joyce Redman above all. The reviews from 1963 are the warmest, treating the film as a daring leap rather than a costume drama.

The reservations cluster around technique. Variety finds the camera tricks and editing occasionally disconcerting, and Empire, writing decades later, thinks the nouvelle vague borrowings now date the film. The later reviews are generally cooler, calling it watchable and entertaining rather than remarkable, though Eye for Film is an exception, still taken with its chaotic energy. The spread is narrow: nobody dislikes it, and the argument is only about how much of the boisterousness still lands.

The New Yorker
5 October 1963 · Brendan Gill
90*

Richardson's Tom Jones is hailed as a near-perfect comedy that triumphantly leaps into an imaginary 18th-century springtime with bold risks and high spirits. The critic praises the authentic Somerset settings, the marvelous ensemble cast led by Albert Finney, and the superb color photography and music.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 October 1963 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The critic finds Richardson and Osborne's adaptation a major creative achievement that captures the ribald wit of the novel through inventive cinematic structure and rhythm. He singles out the lusty performances, especially Albert Finney as Tom and the memorable eating scene between Finney and Joyce Redman.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
70*

Richardson's bawdy adaptation of Fielding's novel mixes Free Cinema roots with nouvelle vague techniques and period detail, resulting in a lively picaresque that captures the permissive spirit of its era. The ensemble cast excels in cameos, though the film now feels somewhat dated.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 October 1963
70*

The review calls the film a bawdy, bellicose, and photographically arresting dark horse of 1963 that is both a fine period piece and a paradox of animal appetites. It singles out Albert Finney's irresistible portrayal of Tom as a rogue-saint figure while noting the film's mix of British humor traditions and filmic tricks.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 July 1963 · Rich Gold
70*

The film is seen as a lusty, boisterous period piece with sex, color, prime performers, and plenty of action that should do strong business. Richardson directs with verve though occasional camera tricks and editing are noted as disconcerting.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 August 2018 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

The critic praises the film's raucous, original energy and chaotic fun as a sex comedy that stands alone, highlighting its tumultuous enjoyment and standout scenes like those with Edith Evans.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1964

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Art Direction, Color
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Won
Best Director
Won
Best Original Score
Won
Best Picture
Won
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

Barry Lyndon poster85

Barry Lyndon

1975 · The same century, held perfectly still; Kubrick’s answer to Richardson’s fidgeting.

The Favourite poster87

The Favourite

2018 · Lanthimos treats the Georgian court with the same disrespect and a wider lens.

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning poster

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

1960 · Finney three years earlier, in Nottingham, with the same grin and fewer wigs.

The Draughtsman's Contract poster82

The Draughtsman's Contract

1982 · Greenaway’s country-house intrigue, colder and cleverer, with murder among the topiary.

Jules et Jim poster

Jules et Jim

1962 · Truffaut’s wipes, freeze frames and narrator, the year before Richardson borrowed them.