Critics’ reviews

Top Gun (1986)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 68: 5 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Top Gun

68
Positive
5
Mixed
5
Negative
0

The reviews lean towards qualified enjoyment, with agreement strongest on the flying sequences. Critics repeatedly praise the aerial photography, dogfight choreography and sense of speed, finding excitement in the cockpit even when the story offers little surprise. Tony Scott’s glossy direction also draws praise, while the soundtrack and recognisably 1980s style help explain the film’s continuing appeal for its warmer admirers.

The division is over how much the scenes on the ground matter. Reservations cluster around the predictable rivalry, unconvincing romance and clunky dialogue, with some critics also troubled by the celebration of military power and male competitiveness. The spread runs from mixed assessments to enthusiastic endorsement: The Playlist embraces the machismo and quotable dialogue as pleasures in themselves, whereas the Los Angeles Times finds the male bonding disturbing and the technological spectacle empty. Even the more sceptical reviews concede that the aerial action delivers.

Empire
2 February 2006 · Adam Smith
70*

Treats the film as a cinematic souvenir and peerless historical artifact of mid-1980s pop cinema rather than a work of art. Singles out the still-exciting flying sequences and its status as infinitely rewatchable cultural icon.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 June 1986 · Vincent Canby
70*

The film is absurd with a standard plot but enjoyable, especially for its extraordinary aerial dogfight footage that feels supersonic and alluring. It carries on the spirit of classic military aviation movies while delivering glossy, high-tech spectacle.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 January 2012 · CPea
65*

The plot is risible and the direction routine with a questionable ethic, but the flying sequences stir the blood like speed and make for a great ride.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · David Parkinson
60

The flying sequences deliver quality entertainment value through realistic aerial footage, but the rivalry, romance and overall macho daydream plot are pure bunk that only the director salvages somewhat.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 May 1986 · Roger Ebert
60*

The aerial dogfight sequences are brilliantly choreographed and exciting, giving a real sense of being in combat. The ground-bound scenes, including the romance and character drama, are grimly predictable and unconvincing.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 May 1986 · Michael Wilmington
50*

It is an exciting but disturbing, mind-boggling yet vacuous male-bonding adventure fixated on being the best, with impressive high-tech aerial visuals and hardware. The plot recycles old clichés and feels like an empty-headed technological marvel or disco war that evaporates quickly.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 May 1986 · Duane Byrge

The critic calls Top Gun a certain summer blockbuster with all the earmarks of being the biggest grosser in years. The technical credits and direction of Tony Scott are the star of the production, with sensational dog-fighting sequences and sound work that puts viewers in the cockpit.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
10 November 2010 · A · The Playlist Staff
95

The critic describes it as Tony Scott's early-career masterpiece and a milestone blockbuster, praising its machismo, quotable dialogue, unmatched aerial camerawork and lasting iconic status despite cheesy elements.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
9 March 2013 · ★★★★½ · Jarrett Kruse
90

The critic praises the film's iconic status as quintessential 80s escapism and popcorn entertainment, singling out the thrilling aerial dogfighting sequences and memorable soundtrack for their enduring appeal. He notes that the IMAX 3D re-release adds little value and some dialogue and scenes now feel dated or cheesy.

Read the full review →
/Film
27 May 2022 · Jeremy Smith
70*

The review calls the film spectacularly entertaining yet terminally stupid, a glossy product that glorifies military might and jingoism while delivering thrilling aerial sequences and iconic pop culture impact.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 January 2016 · festival review · Jennie Kermode
65*

The critic highlights Cruise, the cheesy soundtrack and stunning aerial photography as main selling points but finds the narrative weak with clunky dialogue and non-action scenes that drag, emphasizing style over substance.

Read the full review →
Collider
13 May 2020 · Adam Chitwood

The critic finds the 1986 film better than remembered, especially in 4K, praising Tony Scott's direction for its sweaty, poetic visuals and thrilling aerial sequences. The emotional core is highlighted as the platonic love story between Maverick and Goose amid the macho elements.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate