Twisters (2024)

Twisters is celebrated as a gripping old-school movie event with rousing action, lived-in characters, and strong star power from its leads. The review praises director Lee Isaac Chung’s handling of the material, the chemistry between Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell, and the visceral storm sequences.

Twisters is hailed as a thrilling, smarter-than-it-seems blockbuster with strong action, writing, and tight pacing that leaves viewers wanting more. The review singles out the natural chemistry between Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones and the enjoyable ensemble cast as key strengths.

The critic praises Chung for delivering a supremely entertaining summer blockbuster that expands on the original with thematic heft, strong chemistry between the leads, and emotional depth from Edgar-Jones. The action sequences, especially the opening, stand out as highlights.

The review praises Twisters as a smart, old-school sequel that recalls the capable scientist heroes of the original while delivering sensory thrills. It highlights the charismatic leads Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell, sharp editing, and a sense of community and resilience amid the chaos.

The critic finds the film fails to fully capitalize on its leads' chemistry but succeeds as an entertaining disaster movie with strong set pieces and danger. Chung's direction brings a contemporary, grounded Midwest perspective rooted in his background.

The review notes Glen Powell’s continued rise as a star in this fun, effects-driven sequel that delivers on big-screen thrills. It highlights the whirlwind chemistry and spectacle while positioning the film as a solid summer popcorn entertainment.

The critic calls it a serviceable disaster sequel from the Minari director, delivering teeth-rattling effects and spectacle as buildings are torn apart, but notes the thin science premise and fine but unremarkable chemistry between leads.

Chung's shift to a big-budget sequel lacks the emotional depth of Minari and feels like a load of hot air overall. It has moments but is ultimately more drizzle than storm.

Chung's serviceable summer spectacle never fully resolves its tonal mix of romance, thriller and disaster elements. Likeable leads and some spectacle are undercut by a lack of purpose.

Chung clears a low bar with peppy cast, streamlined story and impressive VFX cyclones for an enjoyably old-school blockbuster. It may not sweep you away but delivers mayhem.

The film relies on thin characters and disaster-movie clichés between set pieces, with no mention of climate change. It prioritises spectacle over substance despite charming leads.

The film is critiqued for lacking the simple charm of its predecessor, with overly convoluted plot points about trauma, climate, and corporate motives that feel mismatched to a summer blockbuster. While the special effects are spectacular and the leads have good chemistry, it ultimately fails to blow the critic away.

The critic notes the sequel shifts focus from visceral spectacle to emotional stakes and ethical issues around storm chasing and science, making tornadoes seem primarily destructive rather than awesome. Characters remain underdeveloped, leaving the central performances and romance feeling hollow.

The film is a middling sequel that unleashes fierce weather but lacks genuine excitement and incremental buildup in its storm sequences. It benefits from Chung's feel for rural Oklahoma geography and the sorrow shown toward devastated small communities.

The critic praises the slick, richly satisfying sequel as far superior to the 1996 original, highlighting elegant direction, strong performances especially from Daisy Edgar-Jones, and an eye-popping climax with clever set pieces.

The sequel underwhelms by trying to be serious about a frivolous story, foregrounding tedious emotional trauma at the expense of lively storm spectacle. Glen Powell stands out with his charismatic, self-aware performance as the tornado wrangler.

The critic finds the film a hugely entertaining white-knuckle ride that blends adrenaline with emotional depth and classic romcom elements, calling it a must-see summer blockbuster with soul.

Twisters is a wildly entertaining 90s-style blockbuster that delivers dazzling set-pieces and celebrates the idea of big-screen spectacle. It combines clever scripting, heart, ecological awareness and an excellent cast into the most fun film of the year.

The critic finds Twisters a thrilling crowd-pleaser that captures the awe and terror of tornadoes while echoing themes from the original. Chung's direction and the leads' performances are praised, though some plotlines and character arcs feel underdeveloped.

Twisters recaptures the simple pleasures of 1990s high-concept popcorn thrills through strong casting and effective spectacle. Chung's direction channels the original's formula into an entertaining modern context focused on the leads' chemistry and escalating storm sequences.

The critic praises it as a breath of fresh air, recapturing the breezy charms of the original with strong character focus and personality.

The critic calls it a satisfying, crowd-pleasing throwback that makes up for lacking originality with sincerity, big-screen action, and a Spielbergian sense of awe, while praising Glen Powell's star turn.

Twisters delivers thrilling huge-scale set pieces with practical and digital effects that create real tension and spectacle. The story and character development feel generic and underdeveloped compared to the action, making it an effective but unremarkable summer blockbuster.

The critic calls Twisters a breezy, fun disaster film with impressive tornado effects and Glen Powell's star power, but faults the lack of chemistry between leads, shallow characters, and miscasting of Daisy Edgar-Jones. It lacks the emotional anchor and ensemble charm of the 1996 original.

The critic finds the film offers spectacle but little substance, criticizing the creaky dialogue and lack of investment in the plot, while noting it's hard to see who it's for beyond fans of the original.