Critics’ reviews

Unbreakable (2000)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 73: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Unbreakable

73
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond positively to Unbreakable’s restrained treatment of comic-book heroism, praising Shyamalan’s assured direction and willingness to take the premise seriously. The performances are a consistent strength, with Bruce Willis’s vulnerability and Samuel L. Jackson’s unsettling presence drawing particular notice, alongside the effectiveness of their pairing. The reviews also value the sombre atmosphere, careful visual storytelling and attention to domestic life, which give the supernatural questions weight without depending on spectacle.

Reservations centre on pacing, emotional distance and a conclusion that several critics find less satisfying than the build-up. Total Film finds the third act rushed, while Radio Times praises the climax as enthralling. The spread runs from qualified admiration to stronger enthusiasm, with even the more reserved assessments finding individual sequences or ideas to admire. Some critics see the solemn tone as thoughtful and ambitious; others find it close to pretentious, or miss the emotional engagement of The Sixth Sense.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Shyamalan moves the supernatural genre to a thought-provoking and surreal new level as the sole survivor of a train crash learns he may have special powers, proving a master storyteller who builds to an enthralling climax. The tone verges on the pretentious but has much going for it.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 December 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

The critic views the film as marking Shyamalan's maturity with a distinctive mood and intriguing supernatural thriller elements that linger in the mind despite flaws and longueurs. He praises the terrific performances by Samuel L. Jackson and Bruce Willis and their superb pairing.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
75*

This study of comic-book heroism and human destiny challenges rather than meets audience expectations, swerving into deeper territory as the hero ponders his responsibilities while preserving ambiguities. It is more mature and ambitious than its predecessor.

Read the full review →
Total Film
29 December 2000
75*

The review highlights the strong premise, assured direction, and Samuel L. Jackson's unsettling performance as creating a compelling story, while noting that the rushed third act and conclusion lack the expected impact. It commends the film's quality and resonance despite imperfections.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic praises the assured direction, strong performances from Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson, and the film's bold comic-book premise explored with little irony. However, the ending is seen as unsatisfying, closing off rather than expanding the mythic potential.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
28 November 2000
70*

The reteaming of Shyamalan and Willis is intriguing and confirms the director as a powerful manipulator of audiences' fears and fantasies, with a hypnotic downbeat tone that builds to a surprise ending. It lacks the emotional engagement of The Sixth Sense.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 May 2001
60*

The film is less than the sum of its parts overall, though individual elements like its careful unraveling and striking visuals stand out as strengths. It presents a spiritually provocative story of self-discovery framed through comic-book metaphors.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 November 2000 · David Denby
60*

The review covers Unbreakable as part of a double bill with Bounce, focusing on its themes of survival and the director's style in a festival-adjacent context around release.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 November 2000 · Nathan Rabin

A flawed but distinctly personal and rewarding film that shares stylistic traits with The Sixth Sense but lacks the same emotional punch due to diminished novelty. It features strong performances, especially from Bruce Willis in a vulnerable role, and an ambitious but uneven mix of clinical storytelling and pulpy twists.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 November 2000 · Elvis Mitchell

The critic notes the film's high anticipation following The Sixth Sense but highlights Shyamalan's growth as a director in delivering a tidy, compact story. It is described as a superhero comic rendered as a haiku, with fine, crisp sequences and an understated approach that may leave some wanting more.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 November 2000

The critic observes that Shyamalan delivers similar elements to The Sixth Sense but with a weaker story, increased pretentiousness, and a less effective surprise ending. Individual sequences are handled impressively with textured cinematography, though overall it falls short of the prior film's impact while still promising solid box office.

Read the full review →
Polygon
22 November 2025 · Isaac Rouse
90*

The critic praises Unbreakable as an underrated and ahead-of-its-time superhero film that offers a grounded, character-driven take on the genre without relying on existing IP or spectacle. They single out its unconventional riff on the Superman myth and cohesive storytelling as standout elements.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
15 June 2013 · Simon Reynolds
85*

The critic praises Unbreakable as Shyamalan's most accomplished film and a groundbreaking deconstruction of the superhero genre, ahead of its time. They single out the intimate domestic drama juxtaposed with grand superhero ideas, along with precise storytelling and elegant camerawork, for particular praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate