Critics’ reviews

Wanda (1970)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 77: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Wanda

77
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Wanda, with praise clustering around its close observation of hardship, Loden’s performance and the rough grain of its photography. The reviews describe a compassionate character study, finding vulnerability, resilience and unforced feeling in her acting. The New Yorker particularly values the physical force of the handheld cinematography, while other positive accounts praise the calm direction and the beauty found in harsh surroundings.

The recorded scores range from mixed to strongly positive, with five positive assessments and no negative ones, but the reasons for the lower ratings remain unclear. The New York Times review is only partially accessible, with no identifiable verdict, while The Playlist’s text is unavailable. Neither therefore supplies a confirmed objection to set against the praise. The available commentary suggests broad agreement; the incomplete sources prevent a reliable account of where reservations lie.

Los Angeles Times
3 August 2018 · Justin Chang
90*

Chang regards Loden’s film as an astonishing, still-vital landmark and a searingly honest character study. He especially praises its grainy visual texture, which finds unexpected beauty in Wanda’s harsh surroundings.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 January 2010 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody gives the film an appreciative assessment, describing its approach as intimate and formally distinctive. He especially praises the jolting physical power of its textures and handheld cinematography.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 March 2019 · ★★★★ · Chuck Bowen
80

Bowen praises the film’s compassionate, finely observed portrait of hardship and its rough-and-tumble Criterion presentation. He singles out Loden’s performance for its expressive blend of naturalism and pathos.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1969 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the film increasingly insightful and impactful. It praises Loden’s calm direction and her vulnerable, resilient performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DP
70*

The review presents the film as subtly picaresque. It singles out its 16mm photography, blown up to 35mm, and the wanderings of its central character.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 September 2006
64*

The page appears to be a review of the 1970 film, but its verdict is unavailable. The accessible content does not reveal what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
27 July 2018
64*

The page was blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be confirmed. No praise or complaint from the review was available to identify.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate