Critics’ reviews

Weapons (2025)

26 reviews from 26 publications. Critics’ score 76: 16 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Weapons

76
Positive
16
Mixed
4
Negative
1

Most critics like Weapons, and a good many like it a great deal. The praise clusters around Cregger’s chapter structure, which tells the story of the disappearing children from several overlapping points of view, and around the way the film keeps horror and comedy in the same room without either spoiling the other. Amy Madigan’s turn as Aunt Gladys is named again and again as the performance that lifts it, and several reviews single out the final chapter as the pay-off the puzzle earns. The reservations are consistent too: a minority find the film slick but shallow, more weird than frightening, with the Financial Times and the Guardian both complaining that the ideas run thin once the mystery is solved. Little White Lies thinks it retreads Barbarian. The New Yorker is the one outright dissenter, finding the ending a gross-out joke. The spread is wide at the bottom and crowded at the top.

Time Out
6 August 2025 · ★★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
100

The critic calls it one of the best horror movies of the year and possibly the best comedy, hailing its wildly creepy, bleakly hilarious invention and satisfying final reel that ties up the knotty narrative. They single out the playful, unexpected path and the way it packs playfulness and invention for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 August 2025 · A · David Ehrlich
95

The critic hails the film as a wildly satisfying genre epic and antidote to recent trauma-focused horror, praising its ambitious cross between domestic horror and sketch comedy.

Read the full review →
Empire
6 August 2025 · John Nugent
90*

The critic calls it a hugely accomplished horror achievement and significant step up from Barbarian. They single out the masterful balancing of serious themes with scares, humour and a cathartic, well-staged finale.

Read the full review →
The Times
7 August 2025
90*

The critic hails the film as gorgeous, terrifying and the best thriller of the year, praising its remarkable handling of the story of disappearing children.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 August 2025 · Amy Nicholson
85*

The critic calls it a spellbinding, disorderly mystery that layers overlapping perspectives to reveal the truth piecemeal. Cregger excels at fusing the ordinary with the outrageous and leaves viewers with potent unanswered questions.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 August 2025 · B+ · Jacob Oller
83

The critic calls it a delightfully nasty, bold, funny, and endlessly scary follow-up that spirals from unimaginable loss with clever mystery, likable characters, and playful horror.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
6 August 2025 · ★★★★
80

The critic hails it as an unnerving, riveting and thunderously entertaining horror epic that more than delivers on its promise with a propulsive, perfectly paced thriller structure. They single out the deft juggling of tones, including black humour and camp, along with the brilliant reveal for praise.

Read the full review →
The Observer
8 August 2025 · Guy Lodge
80*

The critic praises the film’s eerie storytelling, strong performances and command of sensation while highlighting its depiction of US blame culture and community breakdown as particularly effective.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
7 August 2025 · ★★★★
80

The critic calls it a deranged horror that ramps up from eerie suburban drama to a twisted tale of mass child disappearance, delivering a knockout finale that is twisted, hilarious and savage.

Read the full review →
Vulture
8 August 2025
80*

The critic finds the film a twisty-turny hoot that navigates an unnerving middle way between metaphor and piffle, with an oblique structure enhancing dread and a charmingly ridiculous direction.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 August 2025 · Manohla Dargis
75*

The critic praises Cregger's skill at sustaining an ominous mood in a horror film centered on missing children. The narrative structure and delayed reveals build tension effectively around the central mystery.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 August 2025 · David Rooney
70*

The critic praises the film's expert craft, atmospheric style, strong cast, and chapter structure but finds it ultimately lacking in psychological depth or substance, more consistently weird than scary.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 August 2025 · Peter Debruge
70*

The review highlights the hypnotic, multi-perspective structure that keeps imaginations engaged for most of the runtime. While the ending narrows the mystery's scope, Cregger crafts a twisted, memorable bedtime story with strong performances and atmosphere.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
7 August 2025 · Danny Leigh
60*

The critic praises the luminous visuals, jarringly funny moments and hyper-eerie mood but complains that the horror turns hokey and the film has the depth of a puddle despite its ambition.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
8 August 2025 · 4/3/3 · Hannah Strong
60

The critic finds the film’s strong start and effective scares undermined by scattered ideas and a tendency to fall back on familiar territory from the director’s previous work. They single out the spiky humour and Amy Madigan’s scene-stealing turn for praise while complaining that the big reveal and overall approach feel like a rehash.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 August 2025
55*

The critic finds Cregger’s follow-up an initially ambitious yet ultimately simplistic ensemble horror that offers jolting moments but lacks substance and depth.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 August 2025 · ★★/4 · Taylor Williams
50

The critic notes the blend of horror and comedy succeeds overall with grounded characters and invoked social issues, though some fake-outs and the climax's comedy undercut tension.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 August 2025 · Richard Brody
40*

The review finds the film a conventional but slick mystery that ultimately reduces its unsettling premise to a gross-out joke and superficial effects. Cregger's approach misses deeper resonances in favor of predictable genre thrills.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 August 2025

The critic describes an intricately plotted, supremely twisty horror thriller that takes its time laying out an elaborate story before the myriad strands come together in immensely satisfying fashion. They single out the gripping final chapter that delivers sustained terrors while noting the puzzle-box plot risks the mystery outshining the payoff.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
8 August 2025 · Kim Newman

The critic praises Cregger’s elaborate, mosaic-structured follow-up to Barbarian as a deliberately tricky gruesome puzzle-box horror that justifies its length through its labyrinthine path from puzzlement to understanding. They single out Amy Madigan’s startlingly eccentric turn as Aunt Gladys for leavening the horror with absurdist comedy while delivering jolts.

Read the full review →
/Film
28 July 2025 · 9/10 · Chris Evangelista
90

The critic calls it a twisted, funny, and scary suburban nightmare that blends horror and humor effectively while tapping into modern fears. They single out the ensemble structure and macabre finale for praise.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 August 2025 · 8/10 · Ross Bonaime
80

The critic praises Cregger for balancing horror and comedy perfectly in an ambitious, inventive film that may be the best horror of 2025. They single out the multi-perspective structure, tense direction, and standout performances from the ensemble, especially Amy Madigan.

Read the full review →
Polygon
5 August 2025 · Jesse Hassenger
80*

The critic says Cregger outdoes himself with a more conventional yet unpredictable horror drama that delivers a satisfying payoff, eerie imagery, and effective scares. They single out the multiple-POV structure inspired by Magnolia and the atmospheric, momentum-maintaining direction.

Read the full review →
Deadline
5 August 2025 · Pete Hammond

Cregger delivers another impressive horror mystery with a brilliant ensemble led by Garner and Brolin. The film stands out for its creepy atmosphere, strong performances, and layered storytelling that builds on the director's previous work.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
6 August 2025 · 4 out of 5 · David Crow

The review praises Cregger's follow-up to Barbarian as a ruthlessly diabolical and twisted studio thriller that cleverly reveals its American Gothic mystery. It singles out the novelistic puzzle-box structure, tonal mashup, and uniformly excellent performances for particular commendation.

Read the full review →
Paste
6 August 2025 · 8.9 · Jarrod Jones

The critic commends Cregger's sharper comic-horror instincts and the film's brutal, engrossing exploration of loss, paranoia, and social rot in a small town. They single out the chapter structure, ensemble chemistry between Garner and Brolin, and its wicked folk-horror spin.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate