Critics’ reviews

Weekend (2011)

20 reviews from 20 publications. Critics’ score 84: 20 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Weekend

84
Positive
20
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Every one of the twenty reviews is positive, and the praise gathers in the same place: the two lead performances and the talk between them. Most critics find Tom Cullen and Chris New credible and unshowy, and say the long conversations across the 48 hours carry the film rather than slow it. Several single out Andrew Haigh’s long takes and his plain view of an ordinary English town. The comparison to Before Sunrise comes up, and most reviews credit the film with sidestepping the stereotypes of gay romance.

The reservations are small and few. The Hollywood Reporter thinks the drinking and drugs dull it a little. Variety finds it modest in scope, effective mainly as a two-hander. The Playlist notes some structural looseness. Those three are the coolest notices and all came from festival screenings; the reviews written on release in Britain are the warmest, several of them at full marks. The spread runs from good to very good and no further.

The AV Club
22 September 2011 · A · Alison Willmore
95

The critic calls it a great indie romance that is bittersweet, achingly authentic, and intimate to the point of feeling invasive. It excels through detailed looks at two flawed, likable men whose connection unfolds via realistic conversation and contradictions.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Paul Brunick
90*

The critic calls the film a work of surpassing emotional insight and artistic accomplishment, already one of the best of the year. They single out its ambitious, unhurried characterizations and the lead actors' emotionally complex, unself-regarding performances that build to an unexpectedly powerful climax.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 September 2011 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic finds the film a smart, sensitive portrayal of two men whose one-night stand deepens into unexpected emotional intimacy through extended conversation. It singles out the natural dialogue and performances for making the connection feel poignant and real, akin to the Before Sunrise films.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 August 2011 · festival review
90*

A casual one-night stand blossoms into a meaningful connection in this beguiling second feature. It features believable characters, true dialogue, layered performances, and develops into a genuine heartbreaker.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
20 December 2011 · Samuel Wigley
90*

A one-night stand deepens into a deeply romantic weekend in Nottingham. The film excels through long takes, sincere performances, and intimate exploration of a new relationship.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 September 2011 · Critic's Pick · A.O. Scott
90*

The critic calls the film an astonishingly self-assured and unassumingly profound exploration of two young men whose casual encounter grows into something more serious. It singles out the matter-of-fact observation of ordinary British life and the risks of emotional openness for making it one of the most satisfying love stories of the year.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 November 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

The film is a tender, humane lo-fi account of a fleeting gay romance with real-time realism and something urgent to say about life's opportunities. It praises the convincing performances and unforced direction while noting the focus on emotional connection over dramatic issues.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
80*

Andrew Haigh's study of a temporary relationship is more sophisticated than most gay cinema. It is eloquently directed, acted with conviction and, above all, written with a shrewd feeling for the truth, treating its subject with matter-of-fact realism as a refreshingly adult voice on the British film scene.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
4 November 2011 · 3/4/4 · Paul Weedon
80

Haigh's intimate drama follows two men forming an unexpected connection after a one-night stand. It offers refreshingly natural performances and an honest, stereotype-free depiction of gay romance and relationships.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 September 2011 · Kenneth Turan
80*

The critic describes the film as a moving and empathetic look at how relationships develop between two gay men over 48 hours. It singles out the exceptional, nuanced performances by Tom Cullen and Chris New for their emotional depth and credibility.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 September 2011 · Eric Henderson
80*

The critic sees the film as a bold revision of the meet-cute archetype through naturalistic drama that embraces romantic fictions while revealing characters' vulnerabilities. It succeeds by showing how conversations and connections narrow the gap between idealized representations and real emotional truth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
1 November 2011 · ★★★★ · Ben Walters
80

An engaging and moving romance between two men over 48 hours in a mid-sized town. It stands out for potent performances, smart framing, and probing questions of identity and performance.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 November 2011 · Philip Wilding
75*

A casual pick-up evolves into 48 hours of introspection, revelation and soul-searching fuelled by drink, drugs and sex. Terrific low-key turns from the two leads inject their growing bond with genuine emotion, making this a love story that will get under the skin of romantics everywhere.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 July 2011 · festival review · Stephen Farber
70*

The critic finds the film has a crucial dramatic spark in showing why two particular men are drawn to each other through convincing performances and an insightful script. Some deglamorized elements like excessive drinking and drugs slightly undermine it, but the overall romance succeeds.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 March 2011 · festival review · Joe Leydon
70*

The critic finds the earnest and understated film modest in scope but effective as an intimate two-character drama opened up slightly for the screen. It singles out the credible give-and-take between the leads and their extensive conversations for carrying the story.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
28 October 2011 · ★★★★★ · Jamie Neish
100

The review praises Weekend as a remarkably assured and charismatic romantic drama about two gay men finding unexpected love. It highlights the authentic execution of the relationship, explicit but natural sex scenes, and its accessibility beyond queer cinema.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
25 October 2011 · ★★★★★ · Jamie Dunn
100

The critic praises it as the year’s wittiest hymn to romance and a bittersweet, politically astute subversion of the rom-com. They single out the director’s use of long takes, vérité visuals and dynamic editing to capture the leads’ constantly shifting relationship.

Read the full review →
Paste
22 November 2011 · 8.0 · Michael Burgin
90*

The film is a quiet, well-executed study of a relationship’s first bloom between two men. It stands out for its authentic performances and avoidance of stereotypes in depicting gay characters navigating connection and societal pressures.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
25 March 2011 · B+ · The Playlist Staff
83

The review finds Weekend a mostly-assured debut with unexpected power, emphasizing the provocative idea that homosexuality is a political act and the intimate, chatty dialogue between the leads. It notes some structural issues but praises the low-key intimacy.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 November 2011 · Amber Wilkinson
80*

The critic commends Haigh for achieving emotional authenticity through fiction and strong newcomer performances, creating a lasting impression of genuine connection. It singles out the slow-burn chemistry and naturalistic development of the relationship in a realistic urban setting.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate