Critics’ reviews

West Side Story (1961)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 82: 12 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of West Side Story

82
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics are in agreement: twelve of the fourteen notices are positive and none is negative. The praise gathers around Jerome Robbins’s choreography, with the Cool and America numbers picked out, and around the Bernstein and Sondheim songs. Reviewers also credit Robert Wise’s direction, Daniel L. Fapp’s photography and the colour of the costumes, and single out Natalie Wood, Rita Moreno and George Chakiris among the cast.

The reservations concern what happens between the dance numbers. Several critics find the dialogue scenes flat and the central romance thin, and a few note the dubbed vocals and casting choices as compromises of their era. The two mixed notices are both recent: Slant finds the leads uneven and the politics heavy-handed, and The AV Club thinks much of it has dated badly while still calling the dancing thrilling. The spread runs from a low of fifty to several top marks, but the middle is firmly admiring.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

The critic hails the electrifying and moving version of the Bernstein/Sondheim musical, an update of Romeo and Juliet set in late-1950s New York gangs, which earned ten Oscars plus a special award for Jerome Robbins’s choreography. Performances by George Chakiris, Natalie Wood and Richard Beymer are praised, along with co-director Robert Wise’s experience with musicals.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 October 1961 · Philip K. Scheuer
90*

Scheuer hails the film as restoring glory to Hollywood with its powerful impact, brilliant choreography, and tense drama on juvenile delinquency. He singles out the music, dance numbers, and performances by the gang members and leads like Wood and Moreno for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 October 2021 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The 1961 film remains a blinder that is formally electric, musically alive and emotionally pummelling, with bodies in motion used to shape and dictate the film’s own rhythm in a way never seen before. Its Saul Bass opening credits and Robbins’s choreography, especially in numbers like Cool and America, keep it agile, athletic and crisply modern even at 60.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 October 2016 · James Powers
90*

The critic calls it a magnificent milestone in movie musicals that has never been bettered, with fluid tandem direction by Wise and Robbins creating a harmonious whole and standout performances, especially from Natalie Wood.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 October 1961 · Bosley Crowther
90*

Crowther calls the film a thrilling cinematic achievement that advances the sophistication of the musical genre through its vivid translation of the stage material. He highlights the strong performances, especially by Natalie Wood and Rita Moreno, and the superb dancing.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 September 1961 · Whitney Williams
90*

Williams describes the film as a beautifully mounted, impressive and violent musical that powerfully translates the Broadway hit with realism and spectacle. He praises the direction, choreography, score, and performances, especially the gang members' dancing and menace.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · Kim Newman
85*

The critic views the film as a classic musical despite some production compromises like dubbed vocals and casting choices. Standout elements include the hit songs, electric choreography, and the vibrant 'America' sequence.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 September 2011 · ★★★★ · David Jenkins
80

The critic praises this restored fiftieth-anniversary re-release of the classic musical adaptation of Romeo and Juliet set among 1950s New York gangs. The euphoric dance sequences, ultra-melodic tunes, neo-expressionist production design and forceful cinematography are singled out for praise, though the linking dramatic scenes fall flat and the central romance remains underdeveloped.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The review notes the film's reissue as a long but fortunate production with strong performances and song-and-dance numbers. It has only half the vitality of the stage show yet remains a classic.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
15 February 2004 · Roger Ebert
70*

Ebert praises the choreography of Jerome Robbins, the Bernstein-Sondheim songs, and the performances of Rita Moreno and George Chakiris as standout elements. He views the film as containing great things in parts but not a fully cohesive classic by modern standards.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 May 2019 · Tom Breihan
65*

The piece notes that much of the film has not aged well due to dated elements, casting issues, and clumsy social messaging, but singles out the spectacular, gravity-defying choreography and dance sequences as timeless and thrilling.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 December 2011 · Chris Cabin
50*

The review finds the film a dutiful, entertaining adaptation with strong direction, choreography, color, and music that make set pieces work, but notes it is only moderately successful emotionally due to uneven lead performances and on-the-nose politics.

Read the full review →
Collider
30 December 2011 · A · Nico Nico
95

The critic calls the film the perfect movie musical thanks to its brilliant choreography, the combined musical talents of Leonard Bernstein and Stephen Sondheim, and the technical craftsmanship of director Robert Wise and DP Daniel L. Fapp. The review highlights the color-popping wardrobe, emotionally evocative angles, and standout performances, especially from Natalie Wood, Rita Moreno, and the dancers.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 January 2022 · Andrew Robertson
80*

The critic praises how the film leverages cinematic techniques and Jerome Robbins' choreography to deliver surprises and energy that still grip viewers. It notes the defining performances and how the work achieves both artistic and popular success despite dated elements.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate