Wonder Woman 1984 (2020)

The critic finds the sequel a vibrant, hopeful adventure that delivers both blockbuster thrills and emotional warmth. They especially praise Gal Gadot’s graceful, unabashedly feminine portrayal of Diana and the film’s uplifting heroism.

O'Sullivan finds the sequel a lovable, exuberant success, though its finale leaves her slightly flat. She especially praises Kristen Wiig's performance as Barbara and Cheetah, singling out her comic timing and pathos.

Chang finds the sequel exuberant and sincere, praising its overstuffed but cohesive mix of spectacle and satire. He especially singles out Gal Gadot’s magnetic, understated performance as Diana.

The critic finds the sequel overlong but highly likeable and optimistic. They praise Gal Gadot’s performance and Diana’s swamp-draining appeal.

The critic calls it a much-needed, optimistic blockbuster that delivers a positive message. They praise the inventive action and its exhilarating choreography.

Erbland finds the sequel joyous and deeply enjoyable, with a worthwhile story about truth and personal responsibility. She especially praises Pedro Pascal’s exuberant performance as Max Lord, while noting that the crowded plot and some action are difficult to follow.

Kermode finds the sequel entertaining and uplifting, despite its overlong and occasionally baggy plot. He especially praises Gal Gadot’s performance and the film’s joyful presentation of an uncynical heroine.

The review presents the sequel as powerfully entertaining superhero cinema. It praises Pedro Pascal’s performance opposite Gal Gadot and highlights the film’s colourful, action-packed style.

Debruge finds the sequel entertaining as escapist spectacle but says it loses its way in the chaotic finale. He praises Jenkins for keeping the performances and Diana’s inspiring qualities in focus amid the spectacle.

The review’s full verdict is unavailable in the accessible page text. The standfirst only notes the reunion of Gal Gadot and Patty Jenkins amid strange times.

The page content is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint can be identified from the accessible text.

The URL identifies a review of Wonder Woman 1984, but the article text is unavailable. Its verdict and any praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Barsanti finds the film entertaining but overlong and weighed down by an overcomplicated story. He praises its nimble, joyful action and its preference for forgiveness over vengeance.

Strong finds the sequel muddled and less charming and distinctive than its predecessor. She praises the chemistry between Diana and Steve, while faulting the underdeveloped villains and scattered ideas.

Newland finds the film imaginative and charming in places, but ultimately overlong and weighed down by unnecessary subplots. She especially praises the natural chemistry between Gal Gadot and Chris Pine, with Pine’s charisma anchoring their scenes.

Rooney finds the sequel over-plotted and anticlimactic, despite moments of charm. He praises Gadot’s charismatic performance and the early action sequences, while criticizing the crowded story and underdeveloped villains.

Lepore argues that the film fails to engage with Wonder Woman’s feminist roots and the history surrounding its setting. She criticizes its Cheetah storyline for reducing the character to jealousy rather than giving her greater depth.

The critic finds the film eminently forgettable and joyless. They fault its overlong, thinly developed story and single out the patronisingly didactic mall scene as especially annoying.

Bastién finds the sequel a hollow, disappointing spectacle that reflects broader problems in superhero filmmaking. She criticizes its muddled story and weightless action, while noting that Gal Gadot and Chris Pine retain some charm together.

Fletcher finds the film a bold, good-natured, and compassionate superhero adventure, despite weaknesses in its logic and final act. She especially praises its female friendship and vibrant, distinctive style.

The critic finds the sequel a worthy, compassionate follow-up whose earnest optimism offers a balm for 2020. She especially praises Pedro Pascal’s charismatic, over-the-top performance as Maxwell Lord.

The review finds the sequel charming, entertaining and uplifting, with a welcome sense of hope. It especially praises Gal Gadot’s vulnerable, human portrayal of Diana.

Burgin finds the sequel an improvement, praising its character work and emotional focus while noting its slow stretches and weak villains. He singles out the creative, exhilarating action built around Wonder Woman’s lasso.

The review finds the film’s message uplifting, though its plot is messy and its sentimentality can feel excessive. It singles out Steve and Diana’s starlit flight through fireworks as a particularly touching moment.

Kermode finds the film flawed but very enjoyable, with a personal story that gives it charm. She praises Gal Gadot’s vulnerable, emotionally convincing performance and the strong character work.

The critic finds it a big, enjoyable romp, though the final act has notable missteps. They praise Gal Gadot and Patty Jenkins for bringing emotional depth to the colourful action spectacle.

The critic finds the sequel messy and flawed but endearing, and argues that its chaotic excess makes it an entertaining standout in the DCEU. He especially praises Pedro Pascal’s delightfully unhinged performance as Maxwell Lord.

The critic finds the film fresh, witty, and strong in its social satire, though its effects-heavy finale is unwieldy. Kristen Wiig’s transformation from vulnerable Barbara to deadly Cheetah is singled out for praise.

The URL identifies this as a review of Wonder Woman 1984, but the page content is blocked. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Geisinger finds the film entertaining but mechanically plotted and ultimately underwhelming. She singles out Chris Pine’s nuanced, heartfelt performance as its standout.