Critics’ reviews

Yellow Submarine (1968)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 75: 12 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Yellow Submarine

75
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like Yellow Submarine, and mostly for the look of the thing. Heinz Edelmann’s design draws the warmest notices, with reviewers listing the pop-art imagery, the shifting styles and the grotesque, matter-of-fact creatures as the film’s real achievement. The songs are the other constant. The set-pieces built around them are where the film comes alive; the Eleanor Rigby sequence is named more than once as the standout. Several reviewers think it has aged better than the Beatles’ live-action films.

The reservations gather around the story, which is variously called perfunctory, disposable and flabby, with dull patches whenever the music stops. The spread is narrow, most reviews sitting between good and very good, and only Paste dissents, finding nostalgia rather than brilliance and some of the animation creepy. The Guardian is warm but declines to rank it among the band’s best, and The Times warns that children may be bored.

RogerEbert.com
2 December 1968 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is the most original and inventive feature-length animated cartoon in years, sailing in a world of pure fantasy with strange creatures and designs that delight the eye. It exists on two levels, beautifully simple and childlike on one and erudite and deep on another, with fanciful animation illustrating the Beatles songs.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 July 2012 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
90*

Yellow Submarine is an extended pop-art commercial for the Beatles' records and the most worthwhile object to emerge from their shadow, with gloriously lysergic excess and a cheerful naïveté encapsulated in its message that music is better than violence. The critic singles out the phenomenal high-def restoration for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2014 · Caroline Westbrook
80*

The critic finds the animation dazzling and the film a charming, imaginative pop art example that highlights the Beatles' fun with their craft, despite a perfunctory plot. They single out the wildly imaginative imagery for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 July 2018 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The critic finds the film trippy and tune-filled in its re-release, praising its hallucinogenic set-pieces and the way the Beatles songs soar amid the psychedelic fantasy, though noting it is not the best of the band's films.

Read the full review →
Vulture
5 July 2018
80*

The 50th-anniversary restoration highlights the film's idealistic resistance to the status quo through pacifism, positivity, and the power of music in a children's-film register. The critic singles out the counterculture optimism exemplified by 'All You Need Is Love' as a potent but now-cherished utopian mantra.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
70*

The film holds up well as a preservation of the Beatles' public image as clever, innocent lads who save the world through music and love. The critic praises the imaginative animation, musical sequences, and the appealing naïve message despite some dull patches in the script.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 November 1968 · Pauline Kael
70*

Yellow Submarine travels from the nursery to the boutique with charm and ease, lighthearted and unpretentious despite its artistic effects, and the story seems as disposable as the banter and images. The movie is charming and has done what hasn’t been done before in animation on this scale, though it is derivative and ultimately nostalgic for the happy anarchism of love.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 November 1968 · Renata Adler
70*

The Beatles' first feature-length cartoon is designed for the most part beautifully by Heinz Edelmann in styles ranging through various artists and mainly the spirit of the Sunday comic strip. It features the songs of the Beatles and emerges as a pepper cartoon.

Read the full review →
The Times
6 July 2018 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher
70*

This animated freakout strings a loose mock-heroic narrative around Beatles hits and trippy visuals from 200 animators. Arthouse fans and nostalgia lovers should be thrilled by the Pop Art style, though kids will be bored.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1967 · Variety Staff
70*

This is a full-length animated cartoon in which the prime factor is the appearance of the Beatles in caricature form, with all the ingredients of a novel entertainment including a fantastic voyage, pop music, and puns. Unlike Disney the film makes no concession to sentiment, with characters that are matter-of-fact, grotesque and anti-heroic.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 July 2018 · Peter Bradshaw
65*

The 2018 re-release of the 1968 Beatles animation has real charm and archival interest in its frame-by-frame restoration, but the critic finds it not in the top rank of Beatles achievements due to flabby whimsy and treading water between songs. The standout is the powerful Eleanor Rigby sequence with its surreal Liverpool imagery.

Read the full review →
Consequence
12 November 2018
90*

The critic celebrates the film's vibrant, colorful animation and imaginative visuals as its greatest strength, calling it a parade of color and a joyful reminder of animation's potential, despite a slim story.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 July 2018 · Jennie Kermode
80*

The critic praises the film as a landmark of psychedelia and animation that has stood the test of time better than the Beatles' live-action films, highlighting its coherent (if nonsensical) story, diverse animation styles, and effective integration of the songs. She singles out the imaginative imagery, bizarre creatures, and the fun, accessible appeal for all ages as key strengths.

Read the full review →
Paste
7 June 2012 · 7.0 · Norm Schrager
50*

The critic finds the restored film evokes nostalgia more than brilliance, with the animation entertaining but sometimes creepy. The timeless Beatles songs lift the film, especially when synced with visuals like in “Eleanor Rigby” and “When I’m 64”.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate