Critics’ reviews

Black Mirror (2011)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 85: 10 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Black Mirror

85
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive and unusually of one mind. Most critics see Charlie Brooker’s anthology as a 21st-century Twilight Zone, dark satire played with a straight face, and they admire how the opening episode takes an absurd premise about a prime minister and treats it as sober drama, making it both funny and tragic. The praise clusters on the writing, on its observations about social media and the crowd, and on the performances, with Rory Kinnear and Lindsay Duncan singled out.

The spread is narrow, from good to very good, and nobody dissents. What differs is how much each critic has seen. Most reviews cover only the premiere. Empire, having watched all three episodes, rates the final one as the standout. Paste, looking back a decade on, argues that the first series’ standalone stories and refusal of neat endings are what later runs lost. The reservation, such as it is, concerns what came after, not these episodes.

Empire
5 March 2012 · William Thomas
90*

Charlie Brooker’s three-part series is a dark, thought-provoking 21st-century Twilight Zone spin that mixes horror and satire. The final episode stands out as a heartbreaking triumph.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
90*

The premiere is filthy, hilarious and darkly satirical, with a shocking premise about a prime minister facing an impossible dilemma that unfolds with straight-faced absurdity and a thick-of-it edge.

Read the full review →
Variety
8 November 2013 · Brian Lowry
90*

The anthology is creepy, clever and unsettling, capturing modern anxieties through a near-future lens with darkly satiric overtones; it compares favorably to The Twilight Zone.

Read the full review →
Vulture
4 December 2014
90*

The critic calls the dystopian anthology miniseries cynical, searing, shockingly good, and often disturbing, praising its aggressive political take on Western society and how it says more in six episodes than most shows do in dozens.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
4 December 2011 · Michael Hogan
85*

The review calls the first episode a daring, shocking and ballsy blackly comic study of modern media and social networking that becomes oddly believable and tragic. It singles out the audacious satire and its Twilight Zone-like effect for praise.

Read the full review →
The Times
5 December 2011
85*

The critic praises the episode as brilliant satire that reveals the ugly faces of those in power and society's rotten aspects through its shocking premise. It is one of the smartest pieces of drama on television in a long time, played with magnificent solemnity.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 December 2011
80*

The critic finds the premiere episode a superior political satire that plays its absurd premise as straight drama, making the PM's dilemma both touching and funny. It singles out the inexorability of the lead performance and the credible voyeurism of the media frenzy for praise.

Read the full review →
The Independent
5 December 2011 · Neela Debnath
80*

The review calls it a darkly comic tale from Charlie Brooker's warped mind exploring the power of social media and the collective 'hive mind'. It is engrossing and carefully crafted, with strong performances, especially from Lindsay Duncan, serving as a cautionary tale.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 November 2011 · Ryan Lambie
80*

The critic praises the episode as a grim yet compelling caricature of post-Web 2.0 society, highlighting its observations on social media and public opinion. It singles out Rory Kinnear’s performance and the script's blend of dark humor and stark truth for praise.

Read the full review →
Paste
1 December 2021 · Katherine Connell
80*

The critic praises the 2011 Season 1 for its innovative standalone narratives, refusal of closure, and strong performances that humanize the dystopian tech themes, especially in episodes like 'Fifteen Million Merits' and 'The Entire History of You.' They note its self-reflexive satire and genre pastiche while critiquing how later seasons lost some of that inventive edge.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate