Critics’ reviews

Dept. Q (2025)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 69: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Dept. Q

69
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
0

The reviews lean towards approval of Dept. Q, with praise clustering around Matthew Goode’s grumpy detective, the supporting cast and the central mystery. Most critics find familiar crime-drama ingredients handled with enough confidence to hold attention, even when originality is in short supply. Scott Frank’s storytelling, the ensemble’s chemistry and the Edinburgh setting draw favourable notices, while the stronger reviews value the attention given to character alongside the investigation.

Reservations centre on length: several critics find the series overstretched, with a sluggish middle, surplus storylines or too much competing for attention. The spread runs from warm approval to qualified interest, with performances attracting the clearest disagreement. Den of Geek finds the lead abrasive despite praising the cast and humour. NME is a more pronounced dissenter on the acting, finding stiff performances and wooden dialogue that make the characters difficult to care about, though it still acknowledges enough intrigue to sustain attention.

The i Paper
29 May 2025 · Emily Baker
85*

The critic calls Dept. Q one of the best crime dramas Netflix has produced, praising its confident simplicity and Matthew Goode's likeable grumpy detective performance despite familiar Scandi-noir tropes and some superfluous storylines.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 May 2025 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The review describes the series as a solid, well-crafted procedural with a terrific lead performance from Matthew Goode and a compelling mystery, praising Scott Frank's skill at familiar but effective storytelling.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 May 2025 · Aramide Tinubu
75*

The critic finds the series a riveting, intense neo-noir crime thriller with complex characters and a strong mystery, highlighting Matthew Goode's brilliant performance, while noting it can feel overlong at times.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 May 2025 · B- · Tim Lowery
70

The critic finds promise in the show's ensemble and chemistry but notes it feels less taut and more sentimental than Slow Horses, with strong buddy-cop dynamics.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
29 May 2025 · ★★★ · James Hibbs
60

The review praises the strong ensemble led by a phenomenal Matthew Goode and the authentic Edinburgh setting but criticizes the sluggish pacing over nine episodes that drags in the middle.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 May 2025

This Scotland-based adaptation of Jussi Adler-Olsen’s Danish crime novels is fantastic, rich TV. The critic praises the character-first approach, sharp script, first-rate performances (especially Matthew Goode as the haunted detective) and the dense, twisty plot.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
29 May 2025 · Benji Wilson

Although there’s nothing truly original about this new crime drama starring Matthew Goode, it’s still impressively put together. The critic highlights strong direction by Scott Frank, excellent against-type performance from Goode, and well-cast team of misfits in an Edinburgh-set cold-case unit.

Read the full review →
The Times
29 May 2025

The critic describes the Edinburgh-set cop drama as satisfying despite familiar tropes, suggesting Matthew Goode’s detective could become a viewer obsession. The result is compared favourably to a glass of single malt.

Read the full review →
Collider
29 May 2025 · 6/10 · Samuel R. Murrian
60

The critic finds the series an entertaining but overstuffed whodunit with rough edges and a bloated narrative. Goode and Macdonald's performances are singled out as the strongest elements that make it consistently entertaining.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 May 2025 · ★★★ · Louisa Mellor
60

Praises the cast and some humor but criticizes the abrasive lead and generic procedural elements, saying it gets by but doesn't rise above the genre.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
29 May 2025 · ★★★ · Janet A Leigh
60

Notes it's overstretched with too much going on but highlights the great cast and entertaining watch overall.

Read the full review →
NME
29 May 2025 · Rhian Daly
55*

The series has the makings of a solid crime thriller but is undermined by wooden dialogue and stiff performances that make it difficult to connect with the characters or feel invested in their stories. It delivers enough intrigue to hold attention across its episodes without becoming truly addictive or memorable.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate