Critics’ reviews

Escape at Dannemora (2018)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 74: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Escape at Dannemora

74
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and the praise lands almost entirely on the cast. Patricia Arquette’s Tilly Mitchell is named in nearly every review as the reason to watch, with Benicio del Toro and Paul Dano close behind. Ben Stiller’s direction draws steady credit for making a familiar prison-break story feel cinematic and claustrophobic, and several reviews note the care taken over small, closely observed detail.

The reservation is length. Seven hours, most agree, is more than the story needs, and even the warmer reviews concede it meanders. The spread is fairly wide: Collider finds it tense from start to finish, while The Hollywood Reporter calls the pacing a real problem and the characters too unpleasant to spend that long with. Variety adds that the story lacks any pressing reason to be told now. Nobody disputes the acting; the argument is over whether it justifies the running time.

IndieWire
13 November 2018 · Ben Travers
90*

Ben Stiller's direction makes the prison drama riveting. Patricia Arquette delivers a stunning performance in the odd throuple with Benicio del Toro and Paul Dano.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 November 2018 · A- · Laura Bogart
90

The premiere establishes that everyone longs to escape the grubbiness of their lives in subtle, poignant ways beyond the literal prison break. Arquette's Tilly seethes with internal ugliness and yearning in a marvelous performance.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
1 January 2019 · ★★★★
80

The critic finds the miniseries a slow-burn prison-break drama boosted by its excellent cast, noting strong performances and claustrophobic atmosphere while acknowledging it meanders and may feel padded for some viewers.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 January 2019
70*

The critic praises the cinematic quality and stellar cast performances, especially Patricia Arquette's transformative role as the manipulative prison employee, but criticizes the slow-burn pace that makes the prison break story drag at times.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 November 2018 · Daniel D'Addario
70*

Patricia Arquette's committed performance as the resentful and complex Tilly Mitchell stands out and makes the series worth watching despite its punishing length. The critic notes strong direction from Ben Stiller at times but finds the overall story lacks urgent relevance and runs too long.

Read the full review →
Vulture
15 November 2018 · Matt Zoller Seitz
60*

The series is an extraordinary prison break story turned humdrum and longer than it needs to be despite astutely observed details. Stellar performances by Arquette, Dano, and del Toro represent some of the actors' best work.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 November 2018 · Tim Goodman
45*

Strong acting from the cast, including Arquette, Del Toro, and Dano, is undermined by pacing problems and unpleasant, unlikable characters that drag through the prison-break narrative. The series takes too long to build and fails to overcome genre constraints despite thorough research.

Read the full review →
Collider
13 November 2018 · ★★★★★ · Allison Keene
100

The series is a tense, atmospheric drama that reveals a bizarre true tale through strong performances from its leads. Del Toro, Dano, and especially Arquette deliver standout work in this acting showcase directed by Stiller.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
19 November 2018 · Alison Herman
70*

The critic sees the limited series as a strong example of Peak TV's ability to tackle modest-scale true stories with movie-star casts and cinematic style, highlighting Patricia Arquette's transformative performance as Tilly Mitchell and Benicio Del Toro's cunning turn as the mastermind. However, the seven-hour length feels slack and stretched, diluting tension in what could have been a tighter reverse-heist narrative.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate