Critics’ reviews

Fleabag (2016)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 88: 12 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Fleabag

88
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The Telegraph
16 September 2016 · ★★★★★
100

The series is hailed as a gloriously rude, filthy and funny update on confessional singleton comedies like Bridget Jones, blending gross-out gags with touching explorations of grief, loneliness and dysfunction, anchored by Waller-Bridge’s impeccable timing and expressive performance.

Read the full review →
The Times
26 September 2016 · ★★★★★ · Andrew Billen
100

The review calls Fleabag a minor masterpiece that grows stronger with each episode, revealing its core as a story of grief and truth-telling rather than mere bad behaviour, with excellent performances including from Hugh Dennis.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
16 September 2016 · Ben Travers
90*

Phoebe Waller-Bridge's series is a sharply funny and deeply felt comedy about a woman in crisis. It stands out for its incendiary take on modern life and strong central performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 September 2016 · A- · Lisa Weidenfeld
90

Fleabag is a wonderfully funny yet melancholy comedy about a chaotic woman dealing with loss and isolation. It excels through its magnetic lead performance, fourth-wall breaks, and efficient use of flashbacks to reveal deeper emotional truths.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 September 2016 · Tim Goodman
90*

The critic describes the series as exceptionally creative and wonderful, noting the intoxicating mix of humor and sadness in the lead performance and its distinctive new voice on television.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
21 August 2016 · Kasia Delgado
85*

The critic calls the series an unflinching and clever look at tricky youth and self-destruction, highlighting its addictive blend of hilarity and bleakness along with the lead's direct-to-camera asides that create intimacy.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
5 August 2016
85*

The critic finds the series a bleak but riveting portrait of defeated, unlikable characters navigating grief, dysfunction and self-loathing through sharp, bitter humour and strong performances, especially from Waller-Bridge.

Read the full review →
Vulture
16 September 2016
85*

The series feels unique on TV for its singular first-person perspective and fourth-wall-shattering asides that make the protagonist's inner life immediate and personal. It balances crass humor with a powerful portrait of grief and the need for connection.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
19 August 2016 · Daisy Wyatt
80*

The critic finds the series delightfully daring and praises its razor-sharp script and deadpan wit, comparing it favorably to Catastrophe while noting its deeper emotional undercurrents about grief and failure.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 September 2016 · Maureen Ryan
80*

The critic praises how the series impresses in its debut season by unpacking the protagonist's need for validation through sex and revealing unexpected depth and power in its later episodes, ultimately revealing itself as a tragedy beneath the comedy.

Read the full review →
Paste
21 September 2016 · Shannon M. Houston
90*

The critic hails Fleabag as a revelatory series that masterfully blends grief, sex, and sisterhood into a bold comedy that challenges the patriarchy. She singles out the emotional depth of the sister relationship and a standout episode involving family mourning and intimate revelations.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
22 September 2016 · Allison P. Davis
80*

The critic finds that Fleabag's direct address to the audience works exceptionally well, providing insight into the character's inner life that other shows lack. She singles out the honest, unfiltered monologues that make vile behavior understandable and keep the audience on the character's side.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate