Critics’ reviews

Frasier (1993)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 87: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Frasier

87
Positive
8
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly warm, from the first episodes in 1993 to retrospectives nearly thirty years on. The praise clusters on the writing: elegant, verbally dexterous scripts that pair highbrow reference with old-fashioned farce, and several critics rate it a rare spin-off that improves on Cheers. Performances are singled out too, Kelsey Grammer’s casting and David Hyde Pierce as Niles most often.

Reservations are slight and the spread is narrow; every review is positive. Empire treats the first season as a transitional year, with the show only finding its farcical footing in the second. The Independent notes some dated moments, though it finds the humour has aged well overall. The Ringer values the series less for sharpness than for comfort, its low stakes and mellow rhythms making it restorative viewing rather than anything urgent. Nobody argues it is bad; they differ only on whether it is clever or merely soothing.

The Guardian
11 October 2011
90*

The series is a sophisticated, consistently funny sitcom with sharp writing and strong performances, especially David Hyde Pierce as Niles. It rewards repeated viewing across its 11 seasons.

Read the full review →
The Independent
27 May 2022 · Will Gore
90*

Frasier is one of the comedic greats and a rare spin-off better than its parent, with humour that remains surprisingly fresh despite some dated moments. Rewatching highlights how well it has aged overall.

Read the full review →
The Times
14 January 2004 · Joe Joseph
90*

Frasier is one of the cleverest, sharpest and funniest sitcoms of its era, with elegant scripts and marvellous acting that place it alongside other greats like Cheers. It remained strong even in its final season.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 September 1993
90*

The critic finds the series a likely winner thanks to its smart writing and strong characters. Situations, dialogue and casting are all praised as on target and engaging.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 September 1993 · THR Staff
85*

The review welcomes the new series as one of the brighter freshman sitcoms, noting its careful construction of characters and situations. It highlights the move to Seattle and the addition of family members as sources of conflict and comedy.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 May 2004
80*

The second season saw the Crane family come into its own after a transitional first year, embracing verbal dexterity and high farce as hallmarks. At its best, Frasier is both demanding and undemanding, silly yet sharp.

Read the full review →
Paste
2 July 2016
90*

The critic calls Frasier the best multi-cam sitcom ever made and a rare spinoff that surpasses its source material in Cheers. They single out the sharp writing that blends highbrow intellectualism with silly farce and the perfect casting of Kelsey Grammer.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
24 November 2017 · Kate Knibbs
80*

The critic describes Frasier as a wry, circuitous show that was a blockbuster in its time and has found a soothing second life on streaming. They single out its low stakes, mellifluous verbal rhythms, and ability to provide comforting, restorative viewing rather than relevance or aspiration.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate