Critics’ reviews

Heroes (2006)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 75: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Heroes

75
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Heroes, with praise concentrated on its first season rather than its full run. The reviews favour its character-led approach to superpowers, inventive plotting and ability to make a sprawling serial accessible. The cast and writing receive repeated approval, while the gradual connections between characters give the central threat momentum. Several critics value the balance between intrigue and answers; optimism and fresh ideas also help distinguish the series.

Reservations concern both the time it takes to gather pace and what happens after that opening season. Variety supplies the sole mixed assessment, finding style and promise in the premiere but questioning its broad appeal as storylines converge slowly and some characters prove less engaging. The retrospective reviews are positive about the first season but agree that later instalments cannot sustain it. The spread therefore reflects different viewing points as well as different levels of enthusiasm.

The Guardian
4 March 2007
90*

The critic finds the series better than Lost, with a graspable premise about young people developing superpowers and a clear plot to save the world. They single out its inventive writing, acting, shooting and wide-eyed optimism for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 December 2007 · Angie Errigo
70*

The critic finds the first season mystifying yet rewarding, with a story arc that develops well by answering enough questions to keep viewers engaged. It builds from calm introductions of powered characters to an intense climax around a shared nuclear threat.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 September 2006 · Brian Lowry
50*

The critic credits NBC with an ambitious serialized sci-fi premise with cult potential but questions its broad appeal. The premiere has style, intrigue and a serious tone without silliness, though storylines converge slowly and some characters lag.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
13 October 2006 · Neil Wilkes
90*

The series is an excellent serialized drama with a great plot, cast, and writing that stands out from similar shows like The 4400. It is highly accessible and shows strong early ratings potential as a breakout hit.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
9 November 2007 · Natasha Ross
80*

After initially losing interest, the reviewer grew to love the show through a binge-watch of season 1, praising its twists, character development, and standout darker episode 'Five Years Gone' while highlighting Hiro as a favorite.

Read the full review →
/Film
23 May 2022 · Ryan Leston
80*

The first season is a near-perfect television achievement with fresh ideas, interesting characters, and rich storytelling that captured a massive cultural moment. Later seasons failed to replicate the formula despite some strengths.

Read the full review →
Paste
27 May 2022 · Lacy Baugher Milas
75*

The first season was truly great television that changed the landscape for superhero stories on TV with its character-driven approach and memorable twists. The series deserves credit for its early impact despite its later fall from grace.

Read the full review →
Collider
13 May 2023 · Jack Coleman
70*

The first season was exceptional and ahead of its time with strong serialized storytelling and momentum on network TV. The show declined sharply afterward due to decisions to extend beyond its original one-season concept.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate