Critics’ reviews

Legion (2017)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 87: 10 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Legion

87
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimous in their approval. Most critics credit Noah Hawley with taking a known comic-book concept and making something they have not seen before, and the praise clusters on his direction: fractured camerawork, non-linear editing and a surreal, psychedelic look meant to put the viewer inside David’s unreliable mind. The handling of mental illness alongside mutant powers is repeatedly singled out as the show’s real subject. Dan Stevens’ performance and the wider cast draw steady approval, with several critics noting a humane core beneath the flash.

There is little dissent. The spread is narrow, from the Guardian and Telegraph at the lower end to Collider awarding full marks, and even the coolest notices call it ambitious and fascinatingly unconventional. The one caution worth noting is that most of these reviews judge the pilot and early episodes, so the consensus rests on the show’s opening rather than a full run.

IndieWire
6 February 2017 · Ben Travers
90*

Noah Hawley has expertly adapted another known property and turned it into a story we've never seen before, crafting the most intricate and intimate superhero story to date.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 January 2017 · Tim Goodman
90*

The critic praises Hawley's innovative, visually trippy approach to the story of mental illness and mutant powers, calling it a visual masterpiece that reimagines the X-Men concept in a riveting way. They single out the bold, disorienting narrative style from the protagonist's mental perspective for praise.

Read the full review →
Vulture
7 February 2017 · Matt Zoller Seitz
90*

Legion is a decadently inventive aesthetic dream with a superb pilot; it packs a season’s worth of cinematic technique into the early episodes and feels purposeful and exact.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 February 2017 · Maureen Ryan
85*

The review highlights the show's bold, jittery, surreal style and visual flair, noting it as an exhilarating trip that embraces weirdness and misfits. The critic praises Dan Stevens' performance and the humane core amid the flashy elements.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 February 2017
80*

The critic finds Legion a fascinatingly unconventional and ambitious drama even for those with superhero fatigue. Hawley's approach to portraying David's fragmented mind through fractured camerawork, editing and non-linear storytelling is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
9 February 2017 · ★★★★
80

The critic praises Legion as a stylish, psychedelic X-Men spin-off that sets a new standard for comic-book TV thanks to Hawley's distinctive vision. The visually arresting direction and inventive storytelling are highlighted as strengths.

Read the full review →
Collider
2 February 2017 · ★★★★★ · Allison Keene
100

The critic calls it one of the most visually stunning series ever, praising its unique, genre-defying approach to portraying a powerful mutant's mind through the lens of mental illness and unreliable perception.

Read the full review →
Consequence
7 February 2017
90*

The critic hails it as the X-Men adaptation fans deserve for flipping superhero tropes with profound, Lynchian visuals and emotional depth, spotlighting strong performances and Hawley's assured, patient storytelling.

Read the full review →
Paste
8 February 2017 · 8.8/10 · Katherine Siegel
88

The review lauds the pilot for boldly subverting expectations with its arresting visual style and complex handling of mental illness alongside mutant powers, highlighting the stellar cast and clear, ambitious voice.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 February 2017 · Nick Harley
85*

Legion is aggressively peculiar yet extremely powerful and refreshingly unique, using different chemicals to switch up the superhero formula with inventive direction and top-notch performances.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate