Critics’ reviews

Lord of the Flies (2026)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 80: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Lord of the Flies

80
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics welcome Lord of the Flies as a forceful adaptation that finds fresh unease in a familiar story. Praise clusters around Marc Munden’s direction, whose distorted perspectives and unsettling close-ups turn the island into a place of mounting horror, and a young cast credited with naturalistic, affecting performances. The episodes’ focus on individual boys also earns approval for deepening the characters without weakening the novel’s impact. The reviews are predominantly positive, though enthusiasm ranges from wholehearted praise to doubts about the need for another adaptation.

Reservations concern occasional camera choices, length and familiarity: The Times finds it slightly too long, while Collider questions the four-episode stretch and some changes to the source. IndieWire offers the clearest dissent, acknowledging the eerie atmosphere but finding the adaptation inessential because the story is so familiar. The main disagreement is over how much freshness the treatment brings.

The Telegraph
8 February 2026 · ★★★★★ · Anita Singh
100

This is a first-class example of an adaptation done right, a horror story told with tenderness that is stunningly good. The critic singles out Marc Munden’s creative vision and direction, along with the superb young cast, for bringing fresh life to the story through its multi-perspective structure.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 May 2026 · A- · Elijah Gonzalez
90

The miniseries finds fresh terror in the familiar story through sharp writing, a strong young cast, and Marc Munden’s direction that blends naive wonder with horror. The episode structure humanizes the characters and adds depth without losing the novel’s impact.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
4 May 2026
85*

The critic calls it very close to a definitive adaptation of the novel. They single out the superb casting and the direction for praise while noting minor quibbles with some camera choices.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
6 February 2026 · ★★★★ · James Hibbs
80

The critic calls it a glorious reminder of the novel's power and a compelling, visually distinct drama that highlights why the story remains iconic. They single out director Marc Munden's technical achievement and the innovative episode structure told from individual boys' perspectives.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 February 2026
80*

The critic praises this striking BBC adaptation as excellent surreal horror that leaves viewers feeling sick, highlighting its contemporary resonance with themes of toxic masculinity and the fragility of order. They single out the direction by Marc Munden for its unsettling close-ups and sparse dialogue that unmoor the audience.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
4 May 2026 · Ben Travers
55*

The critic calls the four-part Netflix series a vivid, eerie adaptation that echoes the writer's prior work on Adolescence, framing lost innocence as nurture over nature as the boys' utopia descends into chaos. It is described as inessential overall due to the overly familiar story.

Read the full review →
The Times
6 February 2026 · ★★★★☆ · Carol Midgley

This dazzling take matches the novel’s power and is an extremely classy adaptation that will please purists and newcomers alike. The critic singles out Marc Munden’s hypnotic direction and the clever device of episodes focused on different boys, while noting it is slightly too long.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 May 2026 · Alison Herman

The review describes it as a harrowing watch that forcefully conveys the story's horror and tragedy through a stellar young cast without major changes to the novel. They single out Marc Munden's direction for its hallucinatory, distorted perspective and the child actors' naturalistic performances.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
4 May 2026 · Lacy Baugher
80*

The review praises Jack Thorne’s timely take on toxic masculinity and social breakdown, highlighting the phenomenal young cast and Marc Munden’s atmospheric direction of the island setting. It calls the result bigger than the sum of its parts and a convincing argument to revisit the source material.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 May 2026 · 7/10 · Shawn Van Horn
70

The critic finds it a solid but not great adaptation that benefits from strong performances and cinematic style but suffers from being stretched to four episodes with some missteps in changes to the source. Praises the young cast, especially David McKenna and Lox Pratt.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate