The reviews lean negative, with six of thirteen critics unpersuaded and only two in favour, but almost every one of them sets Elizabeth Olsen apart from the series around her. Her Candy Montgomery is called restrained, nuanced and mesmerising, and several critics say she carries more of the story’s emotional weight than David E. Kelley’s scripts do. Praise for the period detail and Lesli Linka Glatter’s direction is common.
The reservations cluster on familiarity. Most critics ask why the case needed retelling so soon after a similar series, and find the answer is that it did not: the plotting is called formulaic, the pace slow and the runtime stretched. A smaller group objects that the victim is left thin while Candy is treated sympathetically. The spread is wide. Collider is the one strong dissent, calling it a standout that avoids sensationalism, while The Times, IndieWire and The Hollywood Reporter sit at the bottom, seeing a tired rehash with little insight.
