Critics’ reviews

Masters of Sex (2013)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 73: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Masters of Sex

73
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics take to it, and the praise gathers in the same two places: Michael Sheen and Lizzy Caplan, and the way the series treats sex as a subject rather than a selling point. Reviewers who braced for a parade of nudity report instead an intelligent, assured period drama that stays restrained, even coy, and is better for it. More than one ranks it the strongest new drama of its season, and the office and medical strands are singled out for giving the research a life beyond the bedroom.

The reservations are narrower. The Guardian finds Sheen’s Masters too detached and one-dimensional, a portrait that leaves dramatic depth on the table, and The Independent, writing at the end of the first run, thinks the finale settles for cliché after a stronger penultimate episode. The lone dissenter is The Times, which finds the pilot solemn and uneven, with no real bond between its leads. Otherwise the spread is tight, sitting between good and very good.

The AV Club
25 September 2013 · A- · Emily St. James
90

The series starts as a somewhat conventional biopic but quickly becomes the best new show of the fall season by mixing a forthright look at sexuality with engaging office stories and medical drama elements. It stands out for making subjects like life, birth, love, and sex feel vitally important.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
23 September 2013 · Tim Goodman
85*

The review praises the depth and substance of the series beyond its initial explicit content, highlighting the strong performances by Sheen and Caplan and the promising dramatic material.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 September 2013 · Brian Lowry
80*

The critic sees it as a triumph of concept and casting for a Showtime series about sex researchers, praising the performances of Michael Sheen and Lizzy Caplan and the handling of the period drama elements without relying solely on explicit content.

Read the full review →
Vulture
29 September 2013 · Matt Zoller Seitz
80*

The critic describes the series as intelligent and assured, noting that it stays sexy by playing coy rather than being overly explicit. They single out the playful, role-playing approach to sexually charged material and the strong central performances for praise, while offering minor criticism of some anachronistic character elements.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 October 2013
70*

The critic finds the series merely very good rather than first-rate, with strong dialogue but a portrayal of William Masters that is too detached and one-dimensional, missing opportunities for dramatic depth.

Read the full review →
The Independent
17 December 2013
70*

The series has developed into a quality drama with strong performances, particularly from supporting actors like Allison Janney and Beau Bridges, though it ends the first season on a clichéd note rather than a stronger penultimate episode.

Read the full review →
The Times
9 October 2013 · ★★☆☆☆ · Andrew Billen
30*

The critic found the pilot uneven and overly solemn despite its explicit content, struggling to establish emotional bonds between the leads or a consistent tone beyond clinical detachment.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 September 2013 · ★★★★ · David Crow
80

The critic calls the pilot the best new series of the fall season and highly recommends it as an alluring cable drama. They single out the slick production, seductive tone, and strong performances by Michael Sheen and Lizzy Caplan for praise while noting the show's restrained handling of its provocative subject matter.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate