Critics’ reviews

Normal People (2020)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 82: 12 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Normal People

82
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
1

The reviews are almost entirely warm, and they agree on where the warmth belongs. Most critics single out Edgar-Jones and Mescal, whose performances as the two leads are described as vulnerable, closely observed and well matched. The sex scenes come up in nearly every review, and the consensus is that they are explicit without being gratuitous, with as much attention paid to awkwardness and consent as to desire. Readers of Sally Rooney’s novel find the adaptation faithful, and several critics think it captures the embarrassments of first love better than most television about teenagers manages.

Reservations are few and small. Den of Geek notes the middle episodes drag, and the Evening Standard feels some of the book’s edge is lost to the slow-burn pace, even while counting that pace a strength. The one real dissent comes from The Hollywood Reporter, which finds the series handsome but muted, too anaesthetised to feel young. Otherwise the spread is narrow.

Radio Times
21 April 2020 · ★★★★★ · Eleanor Bley Griffiths
100

The adaptation captures the novel's emotional depth and complexity of the central relationship. The critic singles out the masterful direction, spot-on casting, music, and visuals for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
28 April 2020 · ★★★★★
100

The TV drama is a rare treat that is even better than the book, thanks to its intimate and tender sex scenes and the way it captures first love and growing up.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 April 2020
90*

The adaptation is a near-perfect rendering of the on-again-off-again relationship, capturing the embarrassments, excitements and humiliations of first love through intimate direction and standout performances by the leads.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 April 2020 · Beth Webb
80*

The series is a refreshingly nuanced study of young love with two powerhouse performances. The critic praises the central performances of Edgar-Jones and Mescal and the careful adaptation that does justice to the source material.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
28 May 2020 · Vicky Frost
80*

The adaptation captures the heady, awkward rush of teenage feelings with compelling performances from the leads and a slow-burn pace that becomes a strength despite some loss of the book's edge.

Read the full review →
Vulture
28 April 2020
80*

The critic praises the series as an honest, absorbing love story that subverts typical teen romance tropes by delving into class, privilege, trauma, and the lasting impact of first love. It highlights the explicit yet tender sex scenes, strong chemistry between leads, and respectful treatment of the characters' emotional depth.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 April 2020 · Critic's Pick · Caroline Framke
70*

The Hulu adaptation is a crushingly intimate and bleak take on the novel with excellent performances. The critic singles out the directing and acting for allowing the story's emotional weight to land effectively.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
28 April 2020 · Inkoo Kang
40*

The adaptation is handsome but disappointingly anesthetized and lacks youthfulness. The critic praises the faithful adaptation and chemistry between the leads while complaining about the overall muted tone.

Read the full review →
NME
22 April 2020 · ★★★★★ · Paul Bradshaw
100

The adaptation is every bit as good as the book deserves, with strong performances from the leads and sensitive direction that avoids teen soap clichés. The chemistry between the two main characters keeps the heartfelt love story warm despite its raw emotion and underlying sadness.

Read the full review →
Paste
1 May 2020 · 8.8/10 · Ellen Johnson
88

The series is an uninhibitedly horny yet deeply felt story of two Irish teens floating in and out of each other's lives, treated with delicacy and care in its small quiet moments. It stands out for its realistic sex scenes, focus on mutual pleasure and consent, and earnest portrait of both sexual and emotional intimacy.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
24 April 2020 · Abby Robinson
85*

The critic describes the series as beautiful and perfectly cast, capturing the essence of the book through its all-encompassing love story and exceptional handling of intimate scenes. It singles out the tender, non-gratuitous treatment of nudity and sex as a standout strength.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 April 2020 · ★★★★ · Kayti Burt
80

The critic calls it a vivid and intimate look at young, messy love, anchored by powerfully vulnerable performances from the leads and faithful to the source material. It notes some pacing issues in the middle episodes but overall delivers for fans and newcomers alike.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
29 April 2020 · Alison Herman
80*

The critic finds the adaptation faithful to Sally Rooney’s novel and authentic to the nuances of adolescent emotion and relationships. She praises how it captures the specific circumstances of the characters and their evolving bond through both intellectual and physical connections.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate