Critics’ reviews

Oz (1997)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 81: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Oz

81
Positive
8
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive about Oz, with praise clustering around its ensemble performances, forceful writing and willingness to confront prison violence without offering much comfort. Most critics regard it as an important influence on later television drama, particularly in its treatment of difficult male protagonists. Its portrayal of racial divisions, predatory behaviour and institutional tensions earns respect for its believability. The experimental flourishes and effective voiceover also draw praise for giving the brutality purpose beyond shock.

The reservations concern how long that force lasts, and how much grimness the drama can bear. Variety admires the prison setting’s realism but finds the relentless bleakness burdensome and offers little sense of anyone to root for. /Film and Collider question the plausibility of later storylines, while The AV Club notes diminishing returns. The spread is between admiration and qualified approval, rather than a dispute over the programme’s strengths.

Empire
12 February 2007 · Kat Brown
90*

The review highlights how the series blends extreme violence with a subtle touch and strong writing, including an effective voiceover, keeping it above mere exploitation. It singles out the excellent ensemble cast, including standout performances, as one of the best in recent TV and calls the show relentlessly entertaining.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
7 June 2017 · Ed Power
90*

When HBO’s Oz debuted in 1997 it was the ultimate shocking experience, pushing boundaries with explicit violence, rape and taboo subjects far further than modern series, rendered nightmarish with avant-garde flourishes and experimental style. It was television without a safety net, bearing witness to American prison realities with uncanny believability and groundbreaking elements like a prominent Muslim character and gay romance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 May 2009
85*

Oz is an unrelentingly grim drama about life and death in an experimental American prison, the bleakest series ever produced in a dehumanising world where every good deed is punished. It is profoundly disturbing, with shocking explosive violence and a recurring struggle for power, yet still nothing on television quite like it.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
12 July 2017 · Danette Chavez
80*

The piece positions Oz as the proto-prestige drama that pioneered HBO's boundary-pushing approach to television a year and a half before The Sopranos. It highlights the show's lasting influence on characterization and difficult male protagonists in later series while noting its strong initial reception and six-season run despite later diminishing returns.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 July 1997 · Ray Richmond
70*

The critic describes the HBO prison drama as vicious, raw and bleak with no one to root for, pushing TV content boundaries in its portrayal of sadistic inmates and retribution. It admires the realistic depiction of racial divisions, predatory behavior and institutional tensions but notes the overall grimness weighs heavily.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 November 2016 · Jamie Andrew
90*

The article celebrates Oz as an overlooked seminal prison drama and grandparent to modern prestige TV like The Sopranos, praising its bleakness, verisimilitude, narrative risks and powerful performances. It argues the show took huge storytelling risks that set the template for the golden age of television.

Read the full review →
Collider
22 September 2023 · Ryan Heffernan
70*

The critic ranks Oz seasons, highlighting season 1 as groundbreaking for its mix of violence and drama that paved the way for new TV, and season 4 part 1 as peak, while noting absurd elements in later seasons. They single out the influence on television history.

Read the full review →
/Film
27 May 2023 · Rachel Ho
70*

The critic ranks the seasons of Oz, praising the debut season for its fresh, boundary-pushing storytelling that influenced modern TV, while criticizing later seasons for jumping the shark with absurd plots. They single out the pioneering role of the series in premium cable television.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate