Critics’ reviews

Sons of Anarchy (2008)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 59: 3 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Sons of Anarchy

59
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
2

The reviews lean positive but are split almost down the middle, and even the admirers share a reservation or two. The acting draws the most consistent praise: nearly every critic, including the two who dislike the series, calls the cast first-rate, and Den of Geek singles out Katey Sagal as Gemma. Those who warm to it see a family drama and a Shakespearean tragedy dressed as a crime thriller, with the club politics and character work counting for more than the shootings. The Ringer, writing a decade on, goes furthest, calling it often excellent and occasionally better than that.

The dissent is about violence and pace. The Hollywood Reporter finds the savagery gratuitous and the characters hard company to keep; Variety, after two episodes, judges it stuck in neutral with people who lack dimension. Even the positive notices concede blustery talk and a familiar antihero template. The spread is wide, and the two negative reviews are the earliest, filed on the opening episodes.

The AV Club
19 August 2009 · B+ · Noel Murray
83

The series is well-acted, twisty, and often shocking with a distinctive take on motorcycle gangs. It can get overheated with blustery talk and feels overly familiar after similar antihero shows.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 January 2010 · William Thomas
70*

The series is a compelling family drama framed as a crime thriller and Shakespearean tragedy about a gun-running biker gang. Strong character work and club dynamics stand out over the violence.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 May 2009
65*

The critic likens the show to The Sopranos with motorcycles and a leather-clad Hamlet, noting its focus on anti-heroes in a biker gang dealing guns. It highlights the violence as both central and overly glamorous, with some comedic touches that may not suit all viewers.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 September 2008
30*

The relentlessly grim and wrenching series makes it hard to stomach time with its savage characters, though ambition and first-rate acting are clear. Excessive random violence crosses into gratuitous territory.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 August 2008 · Brian Lowry
30*

After two episodes the gritty biker drama about a gun-running gang appears stuck in neutral despite an intriguing cast and bleak world. Violence is visceral but characters lack dimension early on.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
15 August 2018 · Shea Serrano
85*

The critic describes Sons of Anarchy as a very good show that was often excellent and occasionally transcendent, crediting its smart, funny, gruesome, inventive, and emotionally powerful storytelling. He singles out the central performances and intricate plotting for particular praise while lamenting its omission from a best-episodes list.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
4 January 2010 · ★★★ · Dave Adamson
60

The review praises the series as well-written, well-acted and well-executed with strong characters and engaging gang politics, comparing it favorably to The Sopranos and The Shield while noting its dramatic tension and contemporary edge. It highlights the cast, including Katey Sagal's standout performance as Gemma, and the balance of violence, language, sex and community elements.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate