Critics’ reviews

Southcliffe (2013)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 72: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Southcliffe

72
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics receive Southcliffe warmly, and the praise clusters around Sean Harris as the gunman, whose performance the reviews describe as convincing and sinister in roughly equal measure. The wider cast is credited with holding the four parts together, and the same qualities come up again and again: an unflinching handling of the aftermath of a mass shooting, a stark and rather beautiful picture of the town, and a sound design one critic finds unusually realistic. Nobody treats it as anything other than serious work.

The reservations are about endurance and structure. The Telegraph wonders whether viewers will put up with such unrelenting bleakness from the first hour onward. Variety finds the nonlinear structure imprecise, and The Hollywood Reporter goes furthest, calling it superior middlebrow television with stilted dialogue and characters that lack depth. The spread is moderate rather than wide: no review is negative, but three of the seven stop short of a recommendation.

IndieWire
26 September 2014 · Erik McClanahan
90*

The series stands out as one of the strongest new offerings available on Netflix. It delivers a powerful, unflinching look at the aftermath of tragedy in a small community.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 August 2013
85*

The series is brilliantly done and frighteningly good, with Sean Harris totally convincing as the shooter. The critic singles out its realistic sound design and starkly beautiful depiction of the town and events for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
17 October 2013 · festival review · Justin Chang
70*

The critic finds it an uneven but powerful four-part study of a small English village reeling from a mass shooting, with searing performances sustaining the work despite narrative imprecisions in the nonlinear structure.

Read the full review →
The Times
5 August 2013 · Andrew Billen
65*

The series explores how ordinary people commit terrible acts in a small town setting, with strong performances including Sean Harris as the gunman. The critic highlights the focus on dysfunctional characters and the unglamorous reality of the violence rather than any simplistic explanation.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
4 August 2013 · Benji Wilson
60*

The episode establishes strong poise and pacing with Sean Harris's sinister performance as the deluded ex-squaddie. The critic notes the sustained grimness ahead and questions whether viewers will tolerate such unrelenting bleakness from the outset.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 September 2013 · festival review · Stephen Dalton
50*

It is quality television but not great cinema: a superior middlebrow drama with high-caliber cast, crisp visuals and sustained bleak mood, though characters lack layered depth and dialogue often feels stilted.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
10 August 2013 · Alex Fletcher
85*

The first two episodes prove utterly captivating despite the bleak subject matter. The series is unflinching and bold, with standout performances, making it one of the scariest and best TV shows of the year.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate