The consensus on Taboo is mixed, with praise clustering around Tom Hardy’s commanding, theatrical performance and the grime of its period setting. Most critics find something compelling in Hardy’s James Delaney, even when the story tests their patience. The detailed production design and Kristoffer Nyholm’s atmospheric direction also earn broad approval. For the more enthusiastic reviews, the strangeness and brooding intensity help make a slow revenge tale absorbing.
The divide is over how much those strengths compensate for thin characterisation, prolonged secrecy and sluggish pacing. Reactions range widely: Digital Spy finds the series absorbing despite its excesses, while Variety sees heavy-handed gloom with too little substance. Its treatment of history divides critics too. Den of Geek praises an unflinching examination of racism, whereas Variety objects to the vague handling of race and Africa. The central reservation is that Taboo spends too long cultivating mystery without developing enough beneath it.
