Critics’ reviews

The Curse (2023)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 75: 11 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Curse

75
Positive
11
Mixed
1
Negative
1

The reviews lean strongly positive. Most critics take the series as a satire of gentrification, white saviour complexes and the ethics of reality television, and most find that satire sharp rather than glib. The word that recurs is cringe: this is, by wide agreement, the most uncomfortable thing on television, and critics tend to mean it as a compliment. Emma Stone’s performance, swinging between do-gooder and narcissist, is the most consistently praised element, with Nathan Fielder’s scenarios and Benny Safdie’s tension-building credited for the creeping dread.

The reservations are about stamina. Vulture argues the opening conceit gives way to repetitive tension and threads left undeveloped, while /Film thinks it does not quite stick the landing. The Guardian goes furthest, finding it almost uniquely unpleasant to watch even while admiring its ambition. The spread is wide, from outright dismissal to near-raves, but the great majority sit at the warm end.

Evening Standard
6 November 2023
90*

The critic hails it as one of the best shows of the year, a genre-bending satire of performative philanthropy, reality TV cynicism and white saviour complexes. Emma Stone’s performance flipping between do-gooder and narcissist is singled out for praise alongside the show’s deadpan accuracy.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 November 2023 · Ben Travers
90*

The critic calls it an exquisite, excruciating black comic wonder and a razor-sharp satire of gentrification, reality TV ethics, performative liberalism, and more, following a couple filming an HGTV-style show. They single out the shocking, boundary-pushing tone and strong performances for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 November 2023 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The year’s squirmiest new show, an exhilarating yet exhausting cringe comedy that is a ruthless evisceration of hollow progressive altruism and performative compassion. Stone and Fielder deliver standout performances amid the voyeuristic discomfort.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 November 2023 · Alison Herman
75*

The series is the most uncomfortable show of the year, an effective study of exploitation at all levels that is often painful to watch. It combines Fielder and Safdie’s sensibilities to reach new depths of discomfort, with Stone’s performance standing out.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
11 November 2023 · Marianne Levy
70*

The critic calls it one of the most excruciating comedies ever seen, a blistering social satire on wealth, race and gentrification that veers between Fargo and a demented Grand Designs. The three leads deliver awful yet wonderful performances that induce constant cringing.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
11 November 2023
70*

The review calls it a strong contender for the weirdest show on television, praising its bonkers dark comedy about an unravelling marriage and gentrification. It highlights the unsettling humour and rising dread as impressive if not always easy to watch.

Read the full review →
Vulture
6 November 2023
50*

The series starts with a promising highwire conceit that creates overwhelming unease through its satire of white saviors and reality TV but quickly starts to dawdle and get stuck in repetitive tension. The critic singles out the initial setup, Stone’s performance, and sharp visual language for praise while complaining about underdeveloped threads and a lack of forward momentum.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 November 2023
30*

The critic describes the series as exquisitely cringe-worthy and almost uniquely unpleasant to watch, yet inventive, provocative and mesmerising in its ambition. It singles out the ultra-cringe moments and creeping dread arising from its satire of gentrification, white saviour complexes and reality TV.

Read the full review →
Consequence
6 November 2023 · A
95

A loaded, unsettling, and magnificent satire that is a career high for Fielder; it boldly physicalizes themes of class, gentrification, and ethics in a meta-TV format.

Read the full review →
Collider
6 November 2023 · A- · Ross Bonaime
90

It blends Fielder's cringey scenarios, Safdie's tension-building, and Stone's daring performance into a peculiar, confounding, and brilliant comedy that tackles white saviors, gentrification, and lack of introspection.

Read the full review →
Paste
6 November 2023 · 8.8 · Brianna Zigler
90*

A biting satirization of white guilt as an exercise in emotional masochism; the show cultivates a revolting yet delicious discomfort through its portrayal of self-serving gentrifiers and an uneasy, evil atmosphere.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
13 November 2023 · Claire McNear
90*

The critic praises the series as a vicious yet delicious parody of lefty do-gooderism and the house-flipping TV genre. She singles out the richly painted satire of the Siegels’ elaborate, hypocritical value system as they attempt to square their woke ideals with their self-interested actions.

Read the full review →
/Film
6 November 2023 · 8/10 · Josh Spiegel
80

The critic finds it an uncompromisingly weird and savage satire that defies description, praising the committed performances and unique commentary on modern culture while noting it doesn't quite stick the landing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate