Critics’ reviews

The End of the F***ing World (2017)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 82: 9 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The End of the F***ing World

82
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Every one of the nine reviews comes down in favour, and the praise gathers in one place: Alex Lawther and Jessica Barden. Critics repeatedly note that the two leads take characters who could have been cartoons and make them people worth caring about, reprehensible and sympathetic at once. Beyond the casting, most reviews credit the series with hiding something tender under its nihilism, and several single out its brevity as a virtue, with the dual voice-over narration also earning mention.

The reservations are mild and cluster at the start. IndieWire and Vulture both find the opening episodes derivative and too determined to be dark, and both say the series improves as it goes. The spread is narrow, running from roughly 70 to 90, with no mixed or negative notices at all. Variety sits at the lower end while still naming it a Critic’s Pick, which suggests the doubts are about degree rather than direction.

Radio Times
9 January 2018 · Ben Allen
90*

The critic calls the series a brilliant, concise and emotionally charged bit of British dramedy, worthy of comparison to Fleabag for its blend of disturbing and hilarious moments. They single out the lead performances and dry rapport between the two young actors as a highlight.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 October 2017
85*

The adaptation is fabulous as a dark comedy about teen nihilists that remains convincing despite its extreme tone. The standout element is the lead performances by Alex Lawther and Jessica Barden, which bring the cartoonish characters to vivid life.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
5 January 2018 · Ben Travers
80*

After a challenging start that feels overly derivative, the series rewards viewers with its uncensored look at young love and unexpected turns. The lead performances and emotional depth make it gripping and surprising overall.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
4 January 2018 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The review praises the series as a twisted, funny anti-romance that is a contained gem with spectacular lead performances. The critic singles out the strong chemistry between the two young actors and the grounded tone amid the outlandish elements.

Read the full review →
Vulture
5 January 2018 · Jen Chaney
75*

The series starts out overly derivative and determined to be dark, but improves as it reveals the sensitivity behind the hardened façades of its teen protagonists. It offers glimmers of loveliness amid the gloom and is worth watching for its narrative turns and brevity.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 January 2018 · Critic's Pick · Sonia Saraiya
70*

The review describes the series as a dark comedy that gets under the skin with sharp intensity while delivering an unlikely love story between two damaged teens. The critic singles out the lead performances for their ability to make the characters both reprehensible and sympathetic.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
5 January 2018 · Louisa Mellor
90*

The show’s aggressive nihilism conceals a tender and romantic centre, delivering a darkly comic story with real emotional weight through outstanding lead performances and meticulous handling of its themes. It is an outstanding, acerbic, tender-hearted and fearless calling card for fresh talent.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
5 January 2018 · Ian Sandwell
85*

The series succeeds thanks to outstanding lead performances that carry emotional weight in a dysfunctional love story, along with its arresting visual style, pitch-black humour, and refusal to pull punches. It is f**king brilliant and deserves a big audience.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
9 January 2018 · Alison Herman
85*

The critic praises the show's blend of romance and moral ambiguity in a misanthropic love story between two troubled teens. They highlight the excellent performances and the effective use of dual voice-over narration that reveals the characters' inner lives.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate