Critics’ reviews

The Four Seasons (2025)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 63: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Four Seasons

63
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
2

The reviews lean positive on The Four Seasons, with praise clustering around its ensemble and its observations about middle-aged friendship and marriage. The warmer responses find the holiday gatherings funny, moving and welcoming despite the characters’ flaws. Colman Domingo draws particular praise, while The Guardian also singles out Steve Carell. For several critics, the appeal lies in the recognisable strains of long relationships and the cast’s ability to make small emotional moments count.

The spread is wide, however, and critics disagree over how well the comedy and drama fit together. Some find the gentler pace companionable; others find too few laughs and too little character development. Variety identifies an unsettled tone and a weakness for prolonged character study. The Telegraph goes further, finding the friendships bitter and the exchanges short on wit or insight. The central divide is over whether this company feels worth spending time with.

The AV Club
1 May 2025 · B+ · Saloni Gajjar
83

The critic praises the show's warm ensemble chemistry, led by Colman Domingo as MVP, and its heartfelt, introspective take on middle-aged friendships and relationships as enjoyable comfort viewing.

Read the full review →
The Times
1 May 2025 · Ben Dowell
80*

The critic calls it a sprightly, witty and thoughtful refashioning of the original story about a middle-aged friendship group on four holidays, with heart and warmth that makes the group welcoming despite their flaws.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
1 May 2025 · B · Ben Travers
77

The critic finds the Netflix adaptation pleasant but perfunctory and more lull than laugh-out-loud, with an affable cast in a light comedy about reevaluating marriages during seasonal vacations.

Read the full review →
Vulture
1 May 2025
65*

The review highlights the series' sharp, resonant observations on midlife crises, aging, and the complexities of long-term marriages and friendships, finding it particularly appealing to its target middle-aged audience despite some contrivances.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 May 2025 · Alison Herman
45*

The series delivers some astute insights into adult relationships but struggles to settle into its dramedic rhythm and tone. The creators are not yet as adept at prolonged character study as they are at pure comedy.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
1 May 2025 · ★★
40

The critic finds the series a midlife misfire that wastes a great cast in a bitter, mean-spirited adaptation lacking wit or depth, with endless bitching instead of genuine humor or insight.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 May 2025 · Angie Han
35*

The show offers a thoroughly mediocre time with thin characters and insufficient humor or memorable moments despite its strong cast and pedigree. It fails to make the friendships or marriages feel particularly meaningful or engaging.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
1 May 2025 · Lucy Mangan

The critic praises the series as Fey's finest work in years, a brilliant, funny and heartbreaking update of the 1981 film about longtime friends navigating relationships and changes over quarterly holidays. Steve Carell and Colman Domingo's performances are singled out as revelatory.

Read the full review →
Consequence
9 May 2025
80*

The piece highlights how the series blends comedy and sincere drama effectively, crediting Tina Fey's maturing storytelling with strong ensemble performances and a powerful handling of themes like aging, loss, and relationships.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
1 May 2025 · ★★★★ · David Opie
80

The critic calls it moving, messy, and deserving of attention as the anti-White Lotus; strong casting and emotional beats make it a comfort show that occasionally surprises.

Read the full review →
Collider
1 May 2025 · 5/10 · Taylor Gates
50

The critic finds the series a lackluster dramedy that wastes its talented cast on underdeveloped, stereotypical characters and insufficient humor or emotional depth. It praises Colman Domingo's comedic turn and some small dramatic moments in the fall episodes.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate