Critics’ reviews

The Last of Us (2023)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 87: 13 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Last of Us

87
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are consistently positive, with praise centred on Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey’s performances and the growing bond between Joel and Ellie. Most critics find that the series works as a drama beyond its video game origins, giving its characters enough attention to make the horror matter. Its balance of fear and tenderness draws repeated approval, while the third episode attracts particular praise for expanding the source material into an intimate story of love and loss.

The differences are chiefly in enthusiasm, with reservations scattered rather than forming a shared objection. Vulture acknowledges familiar post-apocalyptic elements but values the patient attention to relationships. NME finds some supporting characters underused, despite praising the central pairing. The Independent offers more restrained approval, admiring the acting and production design while questioning the series’ moral consistency. The consensus favours its human encounters over any claim to novelty in zombie storytelling.

Radio Times
10 January 2023 · ★★★★★
100

The critic calls it a fantastic drama in its own right that surpasses expectations for a video game adaptation. They single out the perfect casting and chemistry of Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey as Joel and Ellie for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 January 2023
90*

This desperately moving drama set in a zombie-ravaged US is a phenomenal blend of horror and heart, with a cast that could not be more perfect. It manages to find humanity in the ruins through its balance of horror and heart, with standout performances from Pedro Pascal and especially Bella Ramsey.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 January 2023 · Daniel Fienberg
90*

The critic declares it by far the best video game adaptation ever made and very good simply as TV. They single out the central relationship and the standout third episode (directed by Peter Hoar) as what elevates the series toward something truly special.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
10 January 2023 · Emily Baker
85*

The critic calls the series an exhilarating reinvention of the zombie apocalypse genre that succeeds due to its heart and story. They single out the intimate and profound father-daughter relationship between Joel and Ellie, brought to life by stellar performances from Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey.

Read the full review →
The Times
16 January 2023
85*

The series is top-tier television and the best game-to-screen adaptation yet, staying true to its source while broadening the narrative into thoughtful, high-class drama that is at times horrifying.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 January 2023
85*

The critic finds it a promising and moving zombie saga with strong central performances. They single out the dynamic between Ellie and Joel, along with the show's ability to make viewers care about its characters, for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
13 March 2023
80*

The finale delivers a stunning, morally ambivalent ending that echoes the game, pulling viewers in two directions about Joel's choices. It sets up a darker second series while highlighting the extraordinary performances, particularly Bella Ramsey's.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 March 2023
70*

The finale features moments of beauty descending into a whole lot of bloodshed in a brutal showdown, with the acting excellent and production design extraordinary. It remains morally capricious and leaves the series poised for more.

Read the full review →
Vulture
10 January 2023 · TV and film writer

The series is a gripping, ambitious, and well-made adaptation that succeeds in translating the game to television despite familiar post-apocalyptic tropes. It stands out most for its patient study of relationships, especially Joel and Ellie’s evolving dynamic, and for thoughtful detours like the Bill and Frank episode.

Read the full review →
Collider
10 January 2023 · A+ · Ross Bonaime
100

The critic calls the series one of the best video game adaptations ever made and one of the best shows of 2023, praising how it retains the game's emotional power while deepening characters and relationships through strong performances by Pascal and Ramsey and thoughtful expansions. It demonstrates how adaptations should be handled with care and creativity.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 January 2023 · ★★★★★ · Bernard Boo
100

The episode is one of the best hours of television in recent memory and proof that the series is the best video game adaptation ever made. It builds on the game by expanding Bill and Frank's relationship into a moving, intimate story of love and loss that feels natural and dignified.

Read the full review →
/Film
10 January 2023 · Valerie Ettenhofer
90*

The review calls the series a compelling and fantastically acted adaptation that rises to the challenge of its source material. It highlights the standout third episode directed by Peter Hoar as an emotionally intimate high point that unites fans and newcomers.

Read the full review →
NME
10 January 2023 · Alex Flood
85*

The critic praises the ultra-faithful HBO adaptation of the video game as fresh and emotionally powerful despite familiar elements, highlighting the strong chemistry between Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey and the moving central relationship. Some supporting characters feel underused, but overall it succeeds as compelling television.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
16 January 2023 · Alison Herman
80*

The HBO adaptation elevates its video game source material through strong performances and a focus on human survival rather than mere zombie horror. Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey are singled out for breathing new life into the central characters.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate