Critics’ reviews

The X-Files (1993)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 67: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of The X-Files

67
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
3

Most critics come down in favour, and the praise gathers around the pilot and the early standalone episodes. The pairing of Mulder and Scully is named again and again as the foundation: two leads with an easy rapport, working unexplained cases that end with a twist and room for doubt. Several reviews credit the monster-of-the-week stories with setting a standard for television horror, and the 1993 notices find the script ingenious and the direction cool.

The spread is wide. Reservations cluster on the running conspiracy plot, which Empire finds overblown in the revived season while welcoming the return of self-contained cases. The Hollywood Reporter calls the premise laboured and the drama not involving. Two later pieces go further: Vulture argues the show glamorised anti-government paranoia in ways that now look dated, and The Telegraph holds that it turned hackneyed and outlived its novelty. The harshest verdicts come from critics looking back, not from those who saw the pilot fresh.

Radio Times
10 September 2023 · Jack Francis
90*

The article hails the pilot as the greatest in TV history for perfectly establishing the show's mysterious tone, central Mulder-Scully chemistry, and 'trust no one' ethos that defined the series.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 June 2008 · A- · Keith Phipps
90

The critic finds the pilot effective at establishing the show's template of unexplained occurrences investigated with twists, leaving room for doubt. It singles out the chemistry and setup between Mulder and Scully as a strong foundation despite some by-the-numbers elements.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
10 September 2018 · Mark Butler
85*

The piece celebrates how the early seasons' monster-of-the-week episodes revitalized TV horror with inventive, chilling standalone stories that set a high standard still unmatched by many later shows.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 September 1993 · Tony Scott
80*

The critic finds the series promising for sci-fi/mystery fans, praising the well-produced entry, ingenious script, solid team of leads, cool direction, and drive and imagination that give TV sci-fi a boost.

Read the full review →
Empire
6 February 2018 · James Dyer
65*

The review finds the new season's overarching conspiracy plot disappointing and over-the-top but praises the return to strong standalone supernatural procedural episodes that recapture the show's classic appeal.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 September 1993 · Miles Beller
40*

The critic notes some interest despite a labored premise, compares to Twin Peaks and Twilight Zone with camp kick, but concludes it doesn't quite deliver involving drama.

Read the full review →
Vulture
10 September 2013
40*

The essay fondly recalls the show's formative influence on the author but argues it helped glamorize anti-government extremism in ways that feel dated and problematic in a post-9/11, post-truth era.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
11 September 2018 · Ed Power
30*

The critic argues that while the original series had some worthwhile monster-of-the-week episodes and strong lead chemistry, it quickly became hackneyed and outlived its novelty, turning into a blot on culture despite its enduring popularity.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
30 January 2013 · Jennifer Cates
85*

The critic calls the pilot an excellent kickoff that packages the series' core elements—aliens, cover-ups, and character chemistry—into an engaging story with suspense and revelations. It singles out the introduction of the Smoking Man and the Mulder-Scully dynamic for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate