A bride holding flowers and a young girl stand among towering white wedding decorations
Film review

It Was Just an Accident

2025 · Directed by Jafar Panahi · 1h 43m

In a sentenceA kidnapping that keeps stopping so the kidnappers can argue about whether they have the right man

Tehran. Eghbal (Ebrahim Azizi) is driving home at night with his pregnant wife (Afsaneh Najm Abadi) and small daughter (Delmaz Najafi) when he hits a dog and the car breaks down. He pushes it to a workshop where Vahid (Vahid Mobasseri), a mechanic, is working late. Vahid does not get a look at the customer’s face. He hears the squeak of the man’s artificial leg, and he knows it from the prison where he was held and beaten, blindfolded, years before. The next day he follows Eghbal, forces him into the back of his van and drives into the desert with a spade. Eghbal swears he is the wrong man. Unsure, Vahid goes to find Shiva (Mariam Afshari), another former prisoner, who is photographing a bride, Golrokh (Hadis Pakbaten), and her groom, Ali (Majid Panahi).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jafar Panahi, filming without permission after his own spell in prison, puts a torturer in the back of a van and lets his victims argue over him for a hundred minutes. It is funny, frightening and morally serious, and it talks a little too much.

Jafar Panahi has made films under a ban, a film in his flat, a film in a taxi, and now a film after prison, and this is the angriest of them. It is also, for long stretches, a comedy. Eghbal (Ebrahim Azizi) is driving home at night with his pregnant wife (Afsaneh Najm Abadi) and small daughter (Delmaz Najafi) when he hits a dog. The car limps to a workshop where Vahid (Vahid Mobasseri) is working late. Vahid never gets a proper look at the customer. He hears him instead: a squeak in the man’s artificial leg, the same squeak that used to come down the corridor towards his cell. The next day Vahid puts Eghbal in the back of his van and drives into the desert with a spade.

Then he stops. He was blindfolded in prison. He never saw the face of the man who beat him, and a leg is not a face. So It Was Just an Accident becomes a film about a mechanic driving round Tehran with a possibly innocent man in a wooden box, collecting other former prisoners who might be able to say for certain. Shiva (Mariam Afshari), a photographer, is mid-shoot with a bride, Golrokh (Hadis Pakbaten), and her groom, Ali (Majid Panahi), when the van pulls up. Hamid (Mohamad Ali Elyasmehr) wants a shovel and no discussion. Nobody can agree whether Eghbal is Eghbal, or what a decent person does with him if he is.

We recommend it, and not only for what it took to make. Panahi was banned from filmmaking in 2010 and jailed again in 2022; this was shot without permission, and the women in it go bareheaded, which alone would keep it out of Iranian cinemas. The squeak did something to us. It is a small sound, and Panahi holds on Mobasseri’s face while he hears it, and we understood before a word had been spoken that this was a man who has spent years listening for it.

The comedy is in the errands. Every uniform the van meets wants paying, from Mohsen Maleki’s security guard on down, and the kidnappers count out notes for officials while the man in the box waits in the van outside. We laughed a good deal and the laughter had an edge, because the joke is that the country runs on small cash payments and everyone on screen knows the tariff. Amin Jafari shoots most of it in long takes, inside the van in daylight and out on dust roads in the flat afternoon, and he does not move the camera unless somebody moves first. Amir Etminan cuts as little as he can; scenes run until the argument runs out. Leila Naghdi Pari’s production design is mostly a workshop, a van, a box and a white wedding dress, and the dress against the desert is the image we kept.

The performances are the case for the film. Azizi plays Eghbal as a reasonable, frightened family man, and the film’s trick is that this proves nothing either way. Afshari’s Shiva argues for evidence and for the law, and keeps arguing when nobody wants to hear it. Pakbaten’s Golrokh says what was done to her in one plain sentence and then has to go on standing there in her dress. Elyasmehr’s Hamid is all fists and shouting, and the film does not pretend he is wrong. Mobasseri, at the centre, is quiet almost throughout, and it is the quiet of someone who has rehearsed this for years and finds the rehearsal is no use.

The flaws are the flaws of a film made in a hurry by a man with a great deal to say. The talk goes round. The same position is restated in the same words in three different lay-bys, and Etminan’s patience, elsewhere a virtue, lets it. The premise is a fable’s coincidence, of all the workshops in Tehran, and we had to decide early to accept it. One or two speeches are aimed past the other characters at us. No composer is credited, and the silence is right, but it also leaves the dialogue nowhere to hide.

The last stretch is a confrontation we will not describe, and then a final shot and a final sound. That sound frightened us more than anything else in the film, and we are still arguing with ourselves about what it means.

It is a 12A, which is correct. Almost nothing violent is shown. Everything that hurts in it has already happened.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
21
Mixed
2
Negative
0

The reviews lean strongly positive, and no critic writes the film off. Most describe it as a moral thriller about revenge that refuses to settle the question it raises, and most are struck by how Jafar Panahi keeps dark comedy and political anger in the same frame without one undercutting the other. Praise clusters on the writing: the ex-prisoners’ clashing temperaments, the road trip whose growing cast complicates the pursuit of justice, and the satire of officials with their hands out. Several also single out the long, static takes and Vahid Mobasseri’s performance.

The reservations are small and scattered rather than shared. The Observer finds the dialogue can go round in circles. Paste notes an occasional theatricality. The New Yorker thinks the coincidences feel like a fable and the moral argument abstract, though the account of trauma outweighs both. The Los Angeles Times suggests the central mystery hems in the drama. Nobody disagrees on the verdict; the argument is about how much the construction shows.

Evening Standard
11 October 2025 · ★★★★★ · Nick Howells
100

Howells calls the film devastatingly superb and a likely best film of the year. He praises its deft blend of comedy, revenge thriller and political horror, especially its measured craft and subtle final sting.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
3 December 2025 · 4/5/5 · David Jenkins
100

Jenkins finds the film gripping, generous and powerful, while noting its unsettling shift toward an ambiguous stance on revenge. He praises Panahi’s finely calibrated storytelling and the way the road-trip’s expanding cast complicates the characters’ pursuit of justice.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 May 2025 · ★★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
100

The review presents Panahi’s film as a forceful, darkly funny success. It singles out the Coen-esque abduction tale and its cudgel-like impact.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 September 2025 · A- · Natalia Keogan
90

Keogan finds the film tensely riveting and a radical condemnation of state repression. She praises its scathing humor, especially the scenes that expose the everyday normalization of corruption.

Read the full review →
Vulture
17 October 2025 · Bilge Ebiri
90*

Ebiri finds the film extraordinarily powerful and endlessly fascinating. He particularly praises Panahi’s vivid, emotionally grounded characters and the film’s gripping treatment of revenge and uncertainty.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 May 2025 · festival review · Jordan Mintzer
85*

Mintzer finds the film a shrewdly crafted, powerful vengeance drama that condemns the lasting effects of abusive power. He singles out Panahi’s careful visual craft and the ensemble performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is It Was Just an Accident worth watching?
It Was Just an Accident is worth watching, and we scored it 84. Jafar Panahi puts a suspected torturer in the back of a mechanic's van and lets his former victims argue over whether they have the right man, and the result is funny, frightening and morally serious. It talks a little too much in its middle stretch, and the premise asks you to accept one large coincidence early on.
How long is It Was Just an Accident, and what is it rated?
It Was Just an Accident runs 1h 43m. It is a drama and thriller film.
Where can I watch It Was Just an Accident in India?
It Was Just an Accident is streaming on MUBI and Amazon Prime Video in India, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from ₹99.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does It Was Just an Accident compare to The Act of Killing?
It Was Just an Accident is a fiction about victims deciding what to do with a man who may have tortured them, while The Act of Killing is a documentary in which real killers cheerfully re-enact their crimes. The Panahi film is the funnier and more tightly plotted of the two; the Oppenheimer is the more frightening, and supplies less history around its subjects. We recommend both, with the documentary the harder watch.
What should I watch after It Was Just an Accident?
After It Was Just an Accident, try The Act of Killing (2012, Fi1m 88): Indonesian death-squad veterans re-enact their crimes; the smiling is the horror. Then A Separation (2011, Fi1m 93): Farhadi’s Tehran divorce, where every lie is reasonable and every truth costs someone.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2026

Nominated
Best International Feature Film

Asia Pacific Screen Award for Best Feature Film, 2025

Won
Asia Pacific Screen Award for Best Feature Film

BIFA for Best Foreign Independent Film, 2025

Nominated
BIFA for Best Foreign Independent Film

Cannes Film Festival, 2025

Won
Palme d'Or

Sydney Film Prize, 2025

Won
Sydney Film Prize

If you liked this, try…

  1. Death and the Maiden (1994) · not on Fi1m yetA woman ties up the man she thinks tortured her; the argument lasts all night.

  2. Taxi Tehran (2015) · not on Fi1m yetPanahi under his ban, driving a cab, letting the city talk to the camera.

  3. The Act of Killing (2012, Fi1m 88)Indonesian death-squad veterans re-enact their crimes; the smiling is the horror.

  4. Blood Simple (1984) · not on Fi1m yetThe Coens’ first, in which one bad decision needs a shovel and then another.

  5. A Separation (2011, Fi1m 93)Farhadi’s Tehran divorce, where every lie is reasonable and every truth costs someone.

It Was Just an Accident (2025) review: revenge argued over in a van (India) | Fi1m