The Kumars at No. 42 poster
Series review

The Kumars at No. 42

2001 · Created by Sharat Sardana · Series · 30m

In a sentenceA chat show held in a semi-detached house, where the guest is the only person on the sofa who has not read the script

It is 2001, and at number 42, a semi-detached house, a would-be chat show host (Sanjeev Bhaskar) with no obvious gift for it has persuaded his parents to build a television studio on the back. Each week a real celebrity arrives at the front door; guests include Carol Vorderman, Helena Bonham Carter and Robson Green. Before they reach the studio they are sat on the living-room sofa and set upon by the family. Madhuri (Indira Joshi), his mother, feeds them. Ashwin (Vincent Ebrahim), his father, asks how much they earn. Ummi (Meera Syal), his grandmother, asks whether they are married and whether that need stop anything. Then the host takes them through for an interview he cannot keep hold of.

Fi1m review

Sanjeev Bhaskar and Sharat Sardana hide a chat show inside a sitcom and let a fictional family loose on real celebrities. The idea is slight and repeats itself across seven series, but Meera Syal’s grandmother is a comic creation we would put beside anyone’s.

Sanjeev Bhaskar plays the son of the house, who wants to host a chat show, and whose parents have built him a studio on the back of their semi-detached so that he can. That is the whole of the idea. A real celebrity arrives each week, is kept in the living room for a few minutes to be fed, interrogated and propositioned by the family, and is then taken through to the studio for an interview that the host loses control of inside a minute. The family are fictional. The guest is not, and has not been given the script. It is a thin idea, and for its first few series it was done so well that the thinness did not matter.

Meera Syal’s Ummi is the reason it works. Syal, well under half the age of the character, plays the grandmother in cardigan and spectacles as a woman who has stopped caring what anybody thinks of her and has noticed that this is a kind of power. She wants to know whether the guest is married, what they are paid and whether they would like to see upstairs. We laughed, out loud and more than once, at the way Syal lets a question sit until the guest starts to answer it, and then asks a worse one. The skill is that she never breaks. The guest is the only person on the sofa who is allowed to, and sooner or later most of them do.

Indira Joshi and Vincent Ebrahim have the quieter jobs and do them well. Joshi’s Madhuri is all food and worry, pressing plates on people who have come to promote a book. Ebrahim’s Ashwin is interested in money, his own importance and nothing else, and asks the questions about mortgages that a professional interviewer has been trained out of. Bhaskar gives himself the least grateful part: his host has booked the guest, wants badly to be their friend, and is humiliated by his own family before the titles have finished. He plays the panic straight, which is right.

Lissa Evans directs it as a studio sitcom, several cameras and an audience, and Sharat Sardana and Bhaskar’s scripts give the family a handful of lines each and then step back and let the guest react. Anil Gupta produces. The join between the written part and the unwritten part is visible, and the show is honest about it; the fun is watching a professional decide, in real time, how much of the game to play. The guests range from Helena Bonham Carter to Carol Vorderman to Robson Green, and the format is at its best when they do not try to compete.

The caveat is that it is one joke. The show ran for seven series and 51 episodes, from 12 November 2001 to 2006, and the joke did not grow. By the later runs the family’s lines had hardened into catchphrases, and the guests arrived already knowing that the grandmother would make a pass at them, which takes the surprise out of the pass. There is almost no sitcom underneath; nothing happens to the Kumars between guests, and nobody in the house changes. A half-hour also lives or dies by the booking. A guest who will not be embarrassed leaves Syal with nowhere to go, and there are episodes where you can see her looking.

Set against Goodness Gracious Me, the sketch show Bhaskar and Syal came out of, this is narrower and more relaxed; it has one target instead of forty and hits it more often. The one review we have read puts it a little higher than we do, largely because its American adaptation made the original look better by comparison. We do not need the comparison. The show is funny on its own terms and wears out on its own terms too.

Watch the first two series, one episode at a time, with someone old enough to remember who the guests were. Watch any more than that in a sitting and you will start to see the hand on the knee coming.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

1 of 6
Positive
1
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Variety
26 August 2004 · Brian Lowry
85*

Lowry finds the series brighter, cleverer, and funnier than its American adaptation. He especially praises Meera Syal’s hilariously pointed performance as the lusty grandmother.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Kumars at No. 42 worth watching?
The Kumars at No. 42 is worth watching, and we scored it 77, chiefly for Meera Syal’s grandmother, who propositions and interrogates real celebrities on a living-room sofa without ever breaking. It is one joke stretched across seven series, so start with the first two and watch an episode at a time; taken in bulk, the pass at the guest stops being a surprise.
How long is The Kumars at No. 42, and what is it rated?
The Kumars at No. 42 has episodes of about 30m. It is a comedy series.
Where can I watch The Kumars at No. 42 in Panama?
The Kumars at No. 42 is not on any streaming or rental service in Panama at the moment. It is available in 4 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does The Kumars at No. 42 compare to The Larry Sanders Show?
The Kumars at No. 42 puts a fictional family in front of real, unscripted guests, while The Larry Sanders Show is entirely scripted and watches an American chat show from backstage. Sanders is the richer comedy, with a host, a sidekick and a producer who change over time, and we would recommend it to almost anyone. The Kumars is narrower but has the live pleasure of watching a celebrity decide how far to play along.
What should I watch after The Kumars at No. 42?
After The Kumars at No. 42, try The Larry Sanders Show (1992, Fi1m 91): The American chat show seen from backstage, where the host’s panic is the whole point. Then Man Like Mobeen (2017, Fi1m 70): A British Asian family comedy from a later generation, sharper on class and less interested in guests.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Goodness Gracious Me (1998) · not reviewed yetThe sketch show Bhaskar and Syal came from, faster and crueller, with forty targets instead of one.

  2. The Mrs Merton Show (1995) · not reviewed yetCaroline Aherne’s pensioner interviews real guests with the same innocent face and worse questions.

  3. The Larry Sanders Show (1992, Fi1m 91)The American chat show seen from backstage, where the host’s panic is the whole point.

  4. Between Two Ferns with Zach Galifianakis (2008) · not reviewed yetCelebrities sit still and are insulted; the ones who play along survive, as here.

  5. Man Like Mobeen (2017, Fi1m 70)A British Asian family comedy from a later generation, sharper on class and less interested in guests.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever