Juliette (Kristin Scott Thomas) stands before large paintings in an art gallery
Film review

I've Loved You So Long

2008 · Directed by Philippe Claudel · 1h 55m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceKristin Scott Thomas says almost nothing for two hours and the whole of Nancy leans in to listen

Juliette (Kristin Scott Thomas) is sitting in an airport café, smoking, when her younger sister Léa (Elsa Zylberstein) comes to collect her. They have not seen each other in fifteen years. Juliette has been in prison. Léa teaches literature at the university in Nancy and brings her home to a house full of books, a husband, Luc (Serge Hazanavicius), who does not want her near his children, two adopted daughters, including P’tit Lys (Lise Ségur), and Luc’s father Papy Paul (Jean-Claude Arnaud), who has lost his speech to a stroke and reads all day. Juliette must report to a police captain, Fauré (Frédéric Pierrot), find work when nobody will hire her, and sit through family meals where the one subject is the one nobody raises. Léa wants her sister back. Juliette is not sure she is still there.

Fi1m review

Philippe Claudel’s first film gives Kristin Scott Thomas, in French, a woman out of prison after fifteen years and not yet out of anything else. She is remarkable. The film around her is decent and careful, and it explains too much at the end.

Philippe Claudel is a novelist, and this is his first film as director, which you could guess from the dialogue and would never guess from the lead. Juliette (Kristin Scott Thomas) comes out of prison after fifteen years and goes to live with her sister Léa (Elsa Zylberstein) in Nancy, in a house with a husband who does not trust her, two small girls and a great many books. What she did comes out early, in a job interview, and it is bad enough that Léa’s husband Luc (Serge Hazanavicius) has his reasons. Why she did it is held back until the end. It is a good film, worth your evening, and it is carried by one performance.

Scott Thomas has spent much of her English-language career being cool in good coats. Here she is in a borrowed anorak with no make-up, speaking French, and doing almost nothing. Juliette smokes, sits, and answers questions with the fewest words that will end the conversation. Watch her in the interview with a man who wants to know what she went down for. She tells him, flat, and the air goes out of the office. We flinched, and so did he, and the film had us from there. What is striking is how much Scott Thomas lets through later: a dry remark at a dinner party that the guests take for a joke, a half-smile when P’tit Lys (Lise Ségur) asks where she has been and she says, far away.

Jérôme Alméras shoots Nancy in winter grey and the sisters’ house in low lamplight that makes the books look warmer than the people. Samuel Deshors’s production design puts shelves in every room and sits Papy Paul (Jean-Claude Arnaud), mute since a stroke, in a corner with a novel. Laurence Esnault and Jacqueline Bouchard dress Juliette in the same two or three dark things for most of the film; when Léa takes her shopping and she comes out in colour, it counts. Virginie Bruant cuts slowly and lets scenes end on a face rather than a line. The music, by Jean-Louis Aubert and Edouard Dubois, is sparse and mostly guitar, and stays out of the way.

Zylberstein has the harder part, because Léa talks. She wants back a sister she lost when she was too young to be told anything. The scene most people will remember is the one at the swimming pool, where the two women float side by side and Juliette finally says something about the inside of a cell. We were more moved by the earlier one in which Léa, in front of her students, stops being able to teach. Frédéric Pierrot’s Captain Fauré, to whom Juliette must report, is a lonely man who talks about rivers he has never seen. Claire Johnston has one scene as the sisters’ mother, in a care home, and it got to us more than we were ready for: she does not know Léa, and then for a moment she takes Juliette for the girl she was.

The trouble is the writing, and it is a novelist’s trouble. Claudel gives nearly everyone a speech that says what the scene is about. Fauré explains loneliness. A dinner guest explains what people assume about women like Juliette. Then the ending. The film has kept one thing back for a hundred minutes and in the last fifteen it tells us, in a scene between the sisters that goes on past the point where it has worked. We will not say what the reason is. We will say that it is a reason, that it is built to let the audience off, and that the film was braver when it refused to.

Most critics liked it less than we did, and the ones who liked it least were cross about that last scene. We would still send you. It is 115 minutes, and for a hundred of them a woman sits in a kitchen and lets a family find out, slowly, that she is still a person. Scott Thomas does that with a cigarette and a look, and it is enough.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and nearly all of them like it for the same reason: Kristin Scott Thomas. Review after review names her performance first, praising its restraint, its quiet weight and the flashes of dry wit underneath. Philippe Claudel’s direction is credited with keeping the drama understated and credible, so the family tensions build without being forced, and most reviews find the result moving.

The reservations are about the writing, not the acting. Slant finds the script didactic and the pacing uneven; The New Yorker thinks the film withholds too much about Juliette’s crime; Empire, otherwise warm, calls the final scene a wrong note. The spread is wide for a film this well liked. Only Paste comes out against it, arguing that the film piles on suffering without reaching any catharsis, though even that review admires Scott Thomas.

The Hollywood Reporter
18 February 2008 · festival review · Maggie Lee
95*

Lee finds the film deeply moving and praises Philippe Claudel’s assured direction and carefully shaped storytelling. She singles out Kristin Scott Thomas’s performance as stupendous, with the supporting cast also strengthening the film.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 October 2008 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83

The review finds the drama perceptive and restrained, with family bonds tested by guilt and mistrust. It especially praises the restraint that gives a late volcanic confrontation its power.

Read the full review →
Empire
9 September 2008 · Phil de Semlyen
80*

The review praises the film as pitch-perfect overall, despite a discordant final scene. It singles out Kristin Scott Thomas’s performance for its vitality and warmth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 September 2008 · ★★★★ · Nina Caplan
80

Caplan frames the film as a jailbreak story in an unconventional sense. The available description singles out Kristin Scott Thomas’s fluent French.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 October 2008 · ★★★/4 · Aaron Cutler
75

Cutler finds the film worthwhile despite didactic writing and uneven pacing. He especially praises Kristen Scott Thomas’s deeply affecting performance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 February 2009 · Phelim O'Neill
75*

The review is strongly positive about the film’s credible, understated drama. It especially praises Kristin Scott Thomas’s precise and restrained performance.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is I've Loved You So Long worth watching?
I've Loved You So Long is worth watching for anyone who can sit with a quiet, slow family drama carried by one performance, and we scored it 78. Kristin Scott Thomas, in French and almost silent, is the reason to see it. The writing explains too much, and the ending hands over a reason the film was braver without.
How long is I've Loved You So Long, and what is it rated?
I've Loved You So Long runs 1h 55m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch I've Loved You So Long in the US?
I've Loved You So Long is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $2.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does I've Loved You So Long compare to Secrets & Lies?
I've Loved You So Long is the quieter film and Secrets & Lies the richer one, and we would send most people to Mike Leigh first. Both are family reunions where the one subject nobody raises hangs over every meal, and both are let down when the script spells out feelings we already understood. Leigh's is funnier and more generous; Claudel's belongs to Kristin Scott Thomas and a borrowed anorak.
What should I watch after I've Loved You So Long?
After I've Loved You So Long, try Secrets & Lies (1996, Fi1m 88): Mike Leigh’s family reunion, where the barbecue scene does what a confession cannot. Then Three Colours: Blue (1993, Fi1m 88): Juliette Binoche grieves in Paris; Kieślowski trusts her face over any speech; and Rachel Getting Married (2008, Fi1m 84): A sister back from somewhere nobody wants to discuss, at a wedding that cannot stop for her.

Cast

Awards

César Award for Best Actress, 2009

Nominated
César Award for Best Actress

European Film Award for Best Actress, 2008

Won
European Film Award for Best Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Son (2002) · not on Fi1m yetThe Dardennes watch a carpenter watch a boy; the reason is withheld and never explained away.

  2. Secrets & Lies (1996, Fi1m 88)Mike Leigh’s family reunion, where the barbecue scene does what a confession cannot.

  3. Three Colours: Blue (1993, Fi1m 88)Juliette Binoche grieves in Paris; Kieślowski trusts her face over any speech.

  4. Tell No One (2006) · not on Fi1m yetScott Thomas in French again, in a thriller with far more running and the same stillness.

  5. Rachel Getting Married (2008, Fi1m 84)A sister back from somewhere nobody wants to discuss, at a wedding that cannot stop for her.