Police cadets in uniform gather beside parked cars on a city street
Film review

Police Academy 3: Back in Training

1986 · Directed by Jerry Paris · 1h 24m

In a sentenceA police academy threatened with closure makes a surprisingly weak case for staying open

The police academy faces closure, and Carey Mahoney (Steve Guttenberg) is among the familiar faces drawn into the effort to keep it open. Commandant Lassard (George Gaynes) has a collection of misfits on his hands, including Cadet Zed (Bobcat Goldthwait) and Cadet Sweetchuck (Tim Kazurinsky). Training and the academy’s survival become part of the same problem: this group has to show that it deserves to remain in business. The recruits’ failings and the returning officers’ habits complicate a campaign that depends on making an unlikely collection of police officers look competent.

Fi1m review

Jerry Paris gets some good-natured comedy from Steve Guttenberg and Bobcat Goldthwait, but too many jokes arrive already exhausted. Even at 84 minutes, this return to the academy offers too little to recommend.

Police Academy 3: Back in Training is a poor comedy with some likeable people in it. Jerry Paris directs a return to the academy, where the threat of closure gives its collection of misfits a reason to pull together. That is a workable premise: their failings ought to complicate a job that requires them to prove their usefulness. Gene Quintano’s script gets disappointingly little from it, trusting familiar personalities and stale jokes to carry most of the load.

Steve Guttenberg gives Carey Mahoney enough ease and warmth to suggest the sort of film this could have been. His straight-man part is frustratingly slight, leaving too little time for the other personalities to become funny in relation to him. A comedy like this needs someone who can receive a joke as well as deliver one. We wanted more of that relaxed presence, particularly when the script was treating another familiar character trait as sufficient reason to laugh.

Bobcat Goldthwait, as Cadet Zed, supplies the most persuasive reason to stay. We laughed at his good-natured unruliness, because he seems to enjoy being ridiculous without asking for our approval. There is effort and an appealing lack of vanity in the performance, enough to make some otherwise unpromising material work. He earns affection for a film that relies too heavily on the audience already being fond of its characters.

The larger problem is how rarely those characters seem to matter to each other. Gene Quintano supplies an institutional problem, but the relationships are too thin to give it much force. The audience is asked to care about the academy because it contains people we recognise, which leaves the writing with rather more work to do than it acknowledges. There are too few exchanges that make their shared predicament funny, or give the performers something beyond their established personalities to play.

Robert Saad’s cinematography and Trevor Williams’s production design are serviceable, without offering much to enjoy when the writing runs short. The academy never feels distinctive enough to make its possible closure matter beyond the plot’s immediate needs. That puts still more pressure on the performers to keep the place interesting. An ordinary-looking setting can serve a knockabout comedy perfectly well, but here it leaves us dependent on jokes that are only intermittently amusing.

Bud Molin’s editing delivers an 84-minute film that still feels short of pace. The gaps between worthwhile laughs remain noticeable, despite the modest running time. Robert Folk’s music contributes to the general good cheer, though it cannot make the weaker material funny. Stronger comic situations would have helped more than any adjustment to the cutting or accompaniment; too often, a joke has too little going on for either to improve it.

Against the basic demands of ensemble comedy, the film falls short: its characters’ differences produce too little trouble worth watching. Too much depends on recognising a type and accepting that recognition as the joke. Viewers already fond of these characters may forgive the repetition, and Bobcat Goldthwait rewards some of that patience. For anyone without that attachment, there are better uses for even a short evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

38
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
3
Empire
22 September 2006 · Ian Freer
60*

Freer finds it a slight improvement on the previous sequel and one of the better entries, though the franchise feels dated. He singles out Bobcat Goldthwait’s return as Zed for bringing funny, good-natured energy.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · John Ferguson
40

Ferguson calls it a modest improvement on the previous sequel, while noting the series’ puerile appeal. He singles out the familiar plot in which lovable losers save their academy from closure.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1986 · Variety Staff
40*

The review finds the comedy only intermittently amusing, though it sees some charm in the cast’s good-natured dopeyness. It praises Steve Guttenberg’s likable performance but says his straight-man role is abbreviated.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 March 1986 · KEVIN THOMAS
10*

Thomas pans the film, saying it is barely better than the awful second installment. He faults its stale jokes and lack of characterization or meaningful relationships.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Police Academy 3: Back in Training worth watching?
Police Academy 3: Back in Training offers too few laughs to recommend, and we score it 42 out of 100. Steve Guttenberg brings warmth and Bobcat Goldthwait earns some affection, but stale jokes and thin relationships make even 84 minutes drag. Viewers already fond of these characters are the likeliest to forgive it.
How long is Police Academy 3: Back in Training, and what is it rated?
Police Academy 3: Back in Training runs 1h 24m. It is a comedy and crime film.
Where can I watch Police Academy 3: Back in Training in the Philippines?
Police Academy 3: Back in Training is not on any streaming or rental service in the Philippines at the moment. It is available in 25 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Police Academy 3: Back in Training, and is it suitable for children?
Police Academy 3: Back in Training has a UK PG certificate, indicating general viewing with parental guidance rather than suitability for every child. Some material may be unsuitable for younger or more sensitive children; the certificate alone does not establish how much violence or frightening content it contains.
What should I watch after Police Academy 3: Back in Training?
After Police Academy 3: Back in Training, try The Naked Gun (1988, Fi1m 88): Police procedure becomes ridiculous through precise staging and a hero impervious to embarrassment. Then The Lavender Hill Mob (1951, Fi1m 82): A criminal enterprise gives its amiable amateurs a better reason to work together; and The Guard (2011, Fi1m 78): Another troublesome policeman, with sharper writing and considerably less interest in good manners.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Naked Gun (1988, Fi1m 88)Police procedure becomes ridiculous through precise staging and a hero impervious to embarrassment.

  2. The Lavender Hill Mob (1951, Fi1m 82)A criminal enterprise gives its amiable amateurs a better reason to work together.

  3. The Guard (2011, Fi1m 78)Another troublesome policeman, with sharper writing and considerably less interest in good manners.

  4. The Foul King (2000) · not reviewed yetAn unlikely trainee finds a more sympathetic comedy in the wrestling ring.

  5. Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84)For police comedy that gives its supporting eccentrics something useful to do.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever