Film review

Sorry to Bother You

2018 · Directed by Boots Riley · 1h 52m · MPA R

In a sentenceGetting ahead at work apparently requires a different actor to do the talking

FantasyScience FictionComedy

Cassius Green (LaKeith Stanfield) has a white voice that sounds nothing like him: David Cross supplies it. Changing how he sounds offers Cassius a way of getting ahead in a workplace governed by race and money. Around him are Detroit (Tessa Thompson), Langston (Danny Glover) and Salvador (Jermaine Fowler). Corporate demands and the possibility of collective resistance complicate his pursuit of success. Cassius wants to rise, but doing so means reckoning with what he is willing to accept, what he is prepared to change about himself and what his choices mean for other people.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Boots Riley’s corporate satire is funny, angry and anchored by LaKeith Stanfield’s calmly bemused performance. The overcrowding wears us down in places, but the jokes about race and getting ahead are sharp enough to earn our patience.

Sorry to Bother You is a funny, angry corporate satire whose excesses are worth putting up with. Writer and director Boots Riley takes the pressure to get ahead and pushes it into absurdity, keeping race and money in the same conversation. The film asks what a worker must change about himself before the system will reward him, and how far he might go once the rewards begin. It is strongest when an outrageous joke makes that pressure easy to understand.

LaKeith Stanfield gives Cassius Green the bemused steadiness this much commotion needs. He leaves us enough space to recognise an ordinary wish to do better, even when the film surrounding him becomes aggressively strange. That matters because a satire about selling out can make its central character seem contemptible before the audience has understood the temptation. Here, we can follow Cassius’s ambition without being asked to excuse whatever it might cost.

The white voice is the clearest example of how well the comedy can work. Cassius has a voice supplied by David Cross, turning the pressure to accommodate racial expectations into something we can actually hear. We laughed at that mismatch, then felt uncomfortable about how readily the idea made sense. The gag makes racial advantage something a worker can put to use, with all the humiliation that implies. LaKeith Stanfield’s measured presence keeps the joke attached to Cassius.

Doug Emmett’s cinematography makes room for literal sight gags, while Jason Kisvarday’s production design gives the corporate world the same exaggerated character as the dialogue. We would not want these people photographed with the solemnity of a business drama. The visual excess suits the jokes, although there are passages when another strange image feels like one addition too many. The actors remain useful guides through it, with Tessa Thompson providing a forceful presence alongside LaKeith Stanfield.

Terel Gibson’s editing keeps the jokes moving quickly enough that we are not left waiting for the film to explain each one. The trouble comes when the film keeps introducing ideas without giving the previous ones enough room. Merrill Garbus and Boots Riley’s music contributes to that restless feel, and the accumulation can become tiring. We wanted a little more time with the people, particularly in the romantic subplot, which is thinner than the attention given to the film’s more extravagant inventions.

That crowdedness is the substantial caveat. Some jokes run beyond the point at which their meaning is clear, and the later stretches could use a firmer cut. Yet the science-fiction elements belong in a comedy this willing to exaggerate the demands of employers. We will not describe where that takes the story. The increasingly strange material makes sense, even when the pacing falters.

A workplace comedy can get by with an awful boss and the satisfaction of watching someone answer back. Boots Riley is interested in collective resistance, so the film keeps asking what happens beyond one person’s escape from a bad job. That gives its anger a purpose, even when its storytelling becomes untidy. At 112 minutes, it is not a particularly long film, but it asks for a tolerance of digression as well as a taste for abrasive jokes. Give it that much patience; the borrowed voice alone is worth hearing.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
20
Mixed
4
Negative
1
The Times
7 December 2018 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

Riley’s exuberant and original debut deviates from commercial clichés with a restless, inventive style. The film succeeds as a triumph of ideas and physical texture, anchored by Stanfield’s performance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 December 2018 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Riley’s assured debut is a gleefully anarchic satire on capitalism that shifts from acerbic humour into bizarre territory. The film stands out for its inventive use of the ‘white voice’ conceit and literal sight gags.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
3 July 2018 · Richard Brody
90*

The review lauds the rapid, profuse, and overwhelmingly inventive comedy that uses caustic satire to blast societal horrors. It highlights the righteous rage channeled into a vision of collective resistance and the rich loam of experience behind the film.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 July 2018 · NYT Critic’s Pick · A.O. Scott
90*

The critic praises the film's wild, inventive dystopian satire that flips, swerves, and explodes with ideas and inspirations. It singles out the director's originality as both an omnivore and an original in blending influences into something fresh.

Read the full review →
Vulture
24 January 2018 · festival review
90*

Riley's rambunctious, surreal comedy has focus, conviction and rhythmic drive as loud, inventive and impolite revolution-minded cinema that stays human amid the weirdness.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 December 2018 · Alex Godfrey
85*

The critic calls it a wildly inventive, adrenalised anti-capitalist satire that throws ideas at the screen with audacity and invention, praising Stanfield and Thompson's performances while noting it can be overwhelming in its crazed energy.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…

Putney Swope poster

Putney Swope

1969 · Advertising, racial politics and corporate ambition subjected to a similarly unruly comic treatment.

The Man in the White Suit poster

The Man in the White Suit

1951 · A workplace invention exposes how readily employers and workers can fear the same change.

Office Space poster80

Office Space

1999 · Smaller office humiliations, less surreal invention, and an equally healthy distrust of management.

The Bothersome Man poster

The Bothersome Man

2006 · Another comfortable working life made disturbing by rules nobody seems willing to question.

Bacurau poster

Bacurau

2019 · Class anger and collective resistance drive another film best approached without plot details.