Caroline Quentin as Wes and Anjli Mohindra as Archie stand in a control room
Series review

The Lazarus Project

2022 · Created by Joe Barton · Series · CH 16

In a sentencePaapa Essiedu makes saving the world look like a job with inadequate compassionate leave

George Addo (Paapa Essiedu) is drawn into a secret organisation that resets time to prevent global catastrophes. Its work means saving the world repeatedly, with consequences for the people whose lives are changed along the way. Archie (Anjli Mohindra) and Shiv Reddy (Rudi Dharmalingam) are part of the same struggle over when to intervene and what a reset can justify. George must reckon with the distance between protecting everyone and protecting the life that matters to him. As espionage and disaster prevention take over, decisions about ordinary lives become inseparable from decisions about the world’s survival.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The Lazarus Project is a good science-fiction thriller with an unusually persuasive lead in Paapa Essiedu. Its complicated plotting and familiar espionage business can be wearing, but the decisions behind its time resets give it something worth arguing about.

The first series of The Lazarus Project, created by Joe Barton, is a good science-fiction thriller whose complicated plotting earns most of the attention it demands. A secret organisation resets time to prevent global catastrophes, giving the programme a way to ask which lives matter when everyone needs saving. It is a promising basis for an action series, and the scale of the danger supplies urgency. The reason to stay is Paapa Essiedu’s George Addo, who makes the personal consequences difficult to shrug off.

Paapa Essiedu never lets George become merely the person who needs the next rule explained. His confusion has weight, and his likeability leaves room for feelings that are harder to approve of. We cared about him more than we expected to, because his distress makes it difficult to treat the resets as clever plot devices. Even when keeping track of events takes effort, his reactions remain easy to understand.

The writing, by Joe Barton and Howard Overman, is good at making an objection sound reasonable even when its consequences might be terrible. The organisation’s purpose sounds hard to argue with, but preventing catastrophe does not settle what its methods ask of individuals. The programme lets us understand a selfish wish without insisting that we endorse it. A story about changing events would soon become tedious if knowing the rules also told us what everyone ought to do.

Anjli Mohindra’s Archie and Rudi Dharmalingam’s Shiv Reddy help give the ensemble enough weight to stand alongside its lead. Caroline Quentin, as Elizabeth ‘Wes’ Wesley, contributes to a cast that can make the stranger material sound manageable. The performers give the story enough conviction to get through some familiar espionage business without losing our interest altogether. The reservation is that George remains considerably more involving than the organisation around him, particularly when the programme settles into being an action thriller.

Johannes Hubrich’s editing has to accommodate action as well as a plot that keeps asking us to reconsider events. The series generally moves briskly enough, though its busyness sometimes makes an already demanding story harder to follow. There are stretches when keeping up takes more effort than the immediate drama rewards, and explanations compete with the tension. With eight episodes in the first series, some patience for the plotting is part of the bargain.

Time-travel stories can become exhausting when every question needs another explanation before anyone can act. This one usually remembers that we need to care what happens to someone before we care how it is possible. Give it a try for Paapa Essiedu, with some patience for the plotting and the familiar business of saving the world.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Lazarus Project, with praise clustering around Paapa Essiedu’s lead performance and the personal costs of resetting time. The reviews find that its questions about whose lives can be saved give the science-fiction premise emotional weight, while the action and espionage keep it moving. Essiedu is the clearest point of agreement, though the ensemble also earns praise. Several critics welcome a story that develops beyond its apparent procedural beginnings into something more morally complicated.

The reservations concern familiarity and how much effort the plotting demands. Most find enough human interest to carry them through the complications, but The Telegraph considers the thriller clichéd despite its strong opening and excellent lead. Den of Geek is the most enthusiastic, praising the way large ideas are grounded in ordinary lives. The spread runs from qualified approval to considerable enthusiasm, with only one mixed assessment and no outright rejection.

Empire
17 June 2022 · Jordan King
85*

The review highlights the series' blend of high-stakes action, espionage, and deep exploration of time-travel's personal and ethical costs, calling it a gripping and original sci-fi thriller. It singles out the intelligent writing on morality, character arcs, and strong ensemble performances (especially Paapa Essiedu) as standout elements.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
14 June 2022 · ★★★★ · Huw Fullerton
80

The critic finds the series subverts initial expectations of a standard procedural by delving into the emotional and moral consequences of time resets, creating a slick, surprising serialised story. They single out Paapa Essiedu's raw yet likable performance and the inventive visuals and storytelling for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 June 2022 · Lucy Mangan
80*

The critic finds the series gripping, fun and stylish in its time-bending premise about a secret organisation resetting global catastrophes. Strong performances and moral dilemmas keep it compelling despite complex plotting.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
16 June 2022 · Jochan Embley
75*

The time-loop thriller resembles a more accessible Tenet and explores murky morality around saving the world repeatedly. The human core and Paapa Essiedu’s performance stand out as most compelling.

Read the full review →
The Times
16 June 2022 · ★★★☆☆ · Carol Midgley
70*

The series packs in multiple genres and moral questions about resetting time to avert disasters, with an excellent lead performance. Time-travel stories can be hard to follow but this one has timely resonance.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
16 June 2022 · ★★★ · Anita Singh
60

The opening is strong and Paapa Essiedu excellent, but the time-travel thriller feels clichéd and familiar overall. It is watchable but best not overthought.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Lazarus Project worth watching?
The Lazarus Project is worth watching for anyone who likes science-fiction thrillers and has patience for complicated plotting, and we scored it 78. Paapa Essiedu's George Addo is the reason to stay, since he makes the time resets matter as personal losses rather than clever devices. The familiar espionage business and the effort of keeping up are the price of admission.
How long is The Lazarus Project, and what is it rated?
The Lazarus Project is rated 16 by the CH in Switzerland. It is a sci-fi & fantasy and drama series.
Where can I watch The Lazarus Project in Switzerland?
The Lazarus Project is not on any streaming or rental service in Switzerland at the moment. It is available in 32 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is The Lazarus Project, and is it suitable for children?
The Lazarus Project is a series for adults and older teenagers rather than children, carrying a TV-MA rating in the US and no certificate in the UK. It is an action thriller built around global catastrophes and espionage, so expect violence at that scale, though the review's concern is more with the moral weight of the resets than with gore. Younger viewers would also struggle with the plotting.
How does The Lazarus Project compare to Run Lola Run?
The Lazarus Project and Run Lola Run both give their characters repeated chances, but the series is a sprawling eight-episode thriller while Tykwer's film is a brisk, funny sprint under ninety minutes. The film is the tighter and more purely enjoyable of the two; the series thinks harder about who gets saved and who pays. Choose Lola for energy and Essiedu for consequences.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Counterpart (2017) · not reviewed yetMore secretive institutions, with espionage complicated by the lives of their employees.

  2. La Jetée (1962) · not reviewed yetTime travel reduced to memory, longing and a few indelible images.

  3. Run Lola Run (1998, Fi1m 82)Repeated chances turn small decisions into a brisk, anxious physical experience.

  4. Source Code (2011) · not reviewed yetAnother repeated emergency, with a lead who makes the personal stakes matter.

  5. Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes (2020) · not reviewed yetA lighter time puzzle that gets considerable mileage from modest surroundings.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever