A lone man faces an enormous winged figure in a smoke-filled church
Film review

End of Days

1999 · Directed by Peter Hyams · 2h 02m

In a sentenceGabriel Byrne appears to be the only person enjoying the apocalypse

Jericho Cane (Arnold Schwarzenegger) confronts the Devil, appearing in human form as The Man (Gabriel Byrne), as an apocalypse threatens. Christine York (Robin Tunney) and Bobby Chicago (Kevin Pollak) are caught up in a struggle involving physical violence and religious horror. The other figures include Detective Margie Francis (CCH Pounder) and Thomas Aquinas (Derrick O’Connor). Cane has to resist an opponent whose supernatural nature makes the confrontation more complicated than a contest of strength, with religious questions intruding on the business of staying alive.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Gabriel Byrne gives End of Days some welcome malice, and Arnold Schwarzenegger takes his punishment gamely. But the religious plotting is muddled, the solemnity wearing, and the action cannot make the trouble worthwhile.

End of Days has an appealingly unreasonable proposition: put Arnold Schwarzenegger in a religious horror film and see how much of it can be settled by force. Peter Hyams gives that proposition some weight, but not enough wit or clarity to sustain 122 minutes. There are enjoyable stretches, chiefly when Gabriel Byrne takes charge, yet the film keeps interrupting itself to sound grave. The explanations soon become a drag.

Gabriel Byrne, credited as The Man, is the strongest reason to persist. His Devil enjoys being wicked, with enough menace to prevent the performance from becoming merely comic. We were relieved whenever he took charge of a scene. His leering pleasure in the role gives us something recognisably human to recoil from, and he does not seem embarrassed by the material. A little more of that willingness to enjoy the absurdity would have helped everyone else.

Arnold Schwarzenegger plays Jericho Cane with a vulnerability worth taking seriously, even when the performance itself is less convincing. He is game about looking battered, and the punishment gives the action something beyond the usual assurance that the leading man will manage. We do not, however, come to know him particularly well. His commitment earns some sympathy, but Andrew W. Marlowe’s writing asks the religious plot to supply an emotional weight it has not earned.

Peter Hyams also serves as cinematographer, and the action has more force than the horror has dread. The physical spectacle sometimes excites, then the religious business resumes its solemn trudge. Richard Holland’s production design contributes to the oppressive mood, but the surroundings rarely provide a reason to feel afraid. Too much effort goes into telling us how seriously to take the danger, leaving too little room for the anticipation that might make it frightening.

Editors Jeff Gullo and Steven Kemper cannot give the mixture a reliable rhythm. The bursts of action offer some relief, but the film feels laboured whenever it has to account for its supernatural business. John Debney’s music adds urgency without resolving that stop-start feeling. We need to understand what is at stake without spending so much time being instructed, and the editing cannot solve a problem that begins with the writing.

The action-horror combination ought to allow room for both fear and a certain disreputable pleasure. Here, the violence can be forceful, but solemn delivery is repeatedly asked to make the religious plot convincing. Andrew W. Marlowe’s script needs firmer rules and less fuss about them. The familiar ingredients would be easier to forgive if the film did not seem so determined to make us respect them.

There is enough in Gabriel Byrne’s performance to explain an affection for End of Days, and the action occasionally earns its keep. That is not enough to recommend the full 122 minutes. If he is the attraction, be prepared to sit through a good deal that does not involve him.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

43
Positive
0
Mixed
5
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards disappointment, though several critics find End of Days entertaining enough as an action film. Praise clusters around Gabriel Byrne’s lively, menacing Satan, whose presence gives even some detractors something to enjoy. The action earns more qualified approval: individual sequences provide excitement, and the more receptive reviews accept the familiar thrills without finding much to distinguish the film from its predecessors.

The divide is between critics who find the silliness tolerable and those who think the borrowed ideas and muddled religious plotting spoil the entertainment. Schwarzenegger’s performance splits opinion directly: Variety welcomes his vulnerability, while Radio Times finds him unconvincing. The harsher reviews describe a solemn, overblown film whose spectacle cannot make the story persuasive or its characters engaging. The spread is substantial, then, but the favourable end amounts to qualified enjoyment rather than strong enthusiasm; the disagreement is chiefly over how much the action compensates for the weaknesses.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
65*

McCabe finds it an entertaining action film, though it invites unflattering comparisons with Terminator 2 and has clunky moments. He singles out Schwarzenegger doing what he does well, and the comic novelty of seeing him take a beating from Miriam Margolyes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jason Caro
60

Caro finds the film calculated but fairly enjoyable, despite Schwarzenegger’s unconvincing performance. He singles out Gabriel Byrne’s attention-grabbing portrayal of the Devil for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 December 1999 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film entertaining but ultimately unexceptional, delivering what viewers would expect without much more. It especially praises Gabriel Byrne’s lively, menacing performance as Satan, noting that the film loses appeal when he gives way to the computer-generated demon.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 November 1999 · Todd McCarthy
50*

McCarthy finds the film an uneven, middling vehicle that mixes exciting moments with excessive religious horror. He praises Schwarzenegger’s vulnerable performance and singles out the subway chase and crash as especially exhilarating.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 December 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
20*

Bradshaw gives the film a sharply mocking, negative verdict. He complains that it borrows wholesale from other films, while singling out Gabriel Byrne’s Satan as fantastically lascivious.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is End of Days worth watching?
End of Days is difficult to recommend unless Gabriel Byrne’s maliciously playful Devil is the main attraction; we score it 48/100. Schwarzenegger takes his punishment gamely and the action occasionally excites, but the muddled religious plotting and wearing solemnity make 122 minutes feel like a considerable commitment.
How long is End of Days, and what is it rated?
End of Days runs 2h 02m. It is an action and horror film.
Where can I watch End of Days in Spain?
End of Days is available to rent from Apple TV from €3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is End of Days, and is it suitable for children?
End of Days carries a UK 18 certificate and is not suitable for children, with forceful physical violence and religious horror centred on the Devil and an impending apocalypse. We find the action more forceful than the horror is frightening, but that lack of sustained dread does not make it a comfortable choice for squeamish viewers.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Prophecy (1995) · not reviewed yetReligious horror with a sharper appetite for eccentric performances and disreputable fun.

  2. Prince of Darkness (1987) · not reviewed yetA slower approach to apocalyptic horror, with more patience for mounting unease.

  3. Fallen (1998) · not reviewed yetA supernatural opponent makes an ordinary investigation steadily harder to account for.

  4. The Day of the Beast (1995) · not reviewed yetAn apocalyptic horror comedy that finds room for fear and unruly human behaviour.

  5. The Wailing (2016) · not reviewed yetReligious uncertainty becomes frightening in a story that takes time to unsettle.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever