Roger Brown (Aksel Hennie) fires a gun while falling beside a kitchen oven
Film review

Headhunters

2011 · Directed by Morten Tyldum · 1h 40m

In a sentenceAn awful lot of running for a man so concerned with appearances

Roger Brown (Aksel Hennie) is preoccupied with wealth, appearances and his standing in the world. Around him are Diana Brown (Synnøve Macody Lund) and Clas Greve (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau), as the life Roger wants to preserve begins to unravel. His failings become serious liabilities when criminal complications put him in danger. Maintaining his status gives way to the immediate problem of staying ahead of a relentless pursuer. Roger has to improvise his way through increasingly dangerous situations, with little opportunity to recover his composure before the next problem arrives.

Fi1m review

Morten Tyldum’s Headhunters is a brisk, viciously funny thriller, held together by an anxious, resourceful performance from Aksel Hennie. The plotting grows too pleased with itself, but the pursuit earns our attention long before the explanations arrive.

Morten Tyldum makes a thoroughly entertaining thriller out of a man who is difficult to like. In Headhunters, Roger Brown’s vanity matters as much as the danger pursuing him, and the comedy depends on taking both seriously. The film is cruel, quick and occasionally over-arranged, with enough feeling in its central performance to keep the cruelty from becoming tiresome. At 100 minutes, it also knows how long this sort of pressure can usefully be sustained.

Aksel Hennie gives Roger enough anxiety to make his concern with status understandable, even when it makes him objectionable. His mortification is funny because he keeps trying to preserve the seriousness with which he regards himself, despite increasingly persuasive reasons to abandon it. We laughed at Roger’s humiliation, then felt slightly cruel: the panic that Aksel Hennie conveys is too convincing to dismiss. His distress keeps us interested even when Roger’s conduct gives us little reason to be generous.

The screenplay by Lars Gudmestad and Ulf Rydberg, adapted from Jo Nesbø’s novel, gives that performance a demanding succession of problems. Information that initially seems incidental is made to matter, which lets the surprises feel prepared even when the situations become extravagant. Roger’s failings keep the story moving, and our interest survives stretches in which sensible conduct is in short supply. The demands on belief accumulate, but the film usually supplies another immediate problem before we can start examining the previous one.

John Andreas Andersen’s polished cinematography suits a character so invested in how things look, while keeping the pursuit sufficiently clear to follow. That clarity matters when the dangers begin arriving faster and the comedy depends on our understanding just how badly things are going. Nina Bjerch Andresen’s production design gives Roger’s attachment to wealth a useful visual basis, making his concern with appearances feel habitual. The finish serves the character without demanding that we pause to admire it.

Vidar Flataukan’s editing keeps the action readable as its demands become increasingly unreasonable. There is room for the embarrassment to register before the next danger takes over, and that timing helps prevent the chase from becoming numbing. Jeppe Kaas’s contribution to the score supports the tension efficiently, though the music has less personality than the central performance. Morten Tyldum generally lets a predicament become uncomfortable enough to earn its laugh before sending Roger towards another one.

The weakness is the script’s insistence on accounting for itself. As the explanations accumulate, there are passages when we feel the writers making sure every connection has been understood, and the pace briefly suffers. Some of the plotting is implausible enough that this extra attention does it no favours. The film has already persuaded us to accept considerable exaggeration, so the effort spent explaining the machinery feels unnecessary, particularly when it takes time away from the actors.

Among chase thrillers, Headhunters distinguishes itself through the embarrassing business of being Roger Brown. The physical danger works because Aksel Hennie gives us reasons to care about a man we might otherwise be happy to avoid. There is nothing especially unusual about putting a flawed protagonist under pressure, but the performance makes each further indignity matter, and the direction keeps the threat sufficiently serious. Accept a little contrivance, and settle in for an agreeably uncomfortable evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

72
Positive
13
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics find Headhunters a brisk, darkly funny thriller whose escalating dangers and reversals largely justify its excesses. Praise centres on Morten Tyldum’s lively direction, the momentum of the chase and Aksel Hennie’s performance as a deeply flawed man under increasingly humiliating pressure. Hennie gives the reviews a particularly firm point of agreement: his charm, physical agility and visible desperation help keep the protagonist watchable as the plotting becomes more outlandish.

Reservations cluster around plausibility and the handling of the final stretch, with complaints about plot holes, clumsy exposition and overly neat resolutions. Some also find familiar formulas beneath the surprises. The spread is wide, though strongly weighted towards approval rather than evenly divided. Slant Magazine supplies the sharpest dissent, finding the film mean-spirited and empty, and its protagonist too thinly drawn for his suffering to be entertaining.

The Guardian
8 April 2012 · Philip French
90*

French praises the adaptation as an intelligent, cool and brutal Scandinavian thriller. He singles out its cleverly prepared surprises and relentless, inventive chase for particular approval.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
7 August 2011 · B+ · Eric Kohn
83

Kohn finds the film an exhilarating, comic chase that eventually falls back into familiar formulas. He praises Morten Tyldum’s lively action direction and Aksel Hennie’s nimble, Keaton-like performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 April 2012 · B+ · Sam Adams
83

Adams finds it a consistently surprising thriller that maintains coherence. He praises Aksel Hennie’s transformation into a scarred, humiliated underdog pursued by an implacable adversary.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 April 2012 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Huddleston gives the film a strongly positive four-star verdict. The page teaser singles out its relentless succession of increasingly extreme dangers and reversals.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 March 2012 · ★★★★ · Matt Glasby
80

Glasby gives the film a strong review, praising its fast-moving action and tonal daring. He especially singles out Aksel Hennie’s charming performance as the deeply flawed protagonist.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
27 April 2012 · Kenneth Turan
75*

Turan praises the film as a thrilling, over-the-top ride, despite its implausibilities. He singles out the slick direction and tension-building as strengths.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Headhunters worth watching?
Headhunters is well worth watching for fans of brisk, darkly funny chase thrillers, and we score it 80 out of 100. Aksel Hennie’s anxious performance makes an objectionable man worth following, though we find the plotting occasionally implausible and the explanations more elaborate than the film needs.
How long is Headhunters, and what is it rated?
Headhunters runs 1h 40m. It is a thriller and crime film.
Where can I watch Headhunters in Bulgaria?
Headhunters is not on any streaming or rental service in Bulgaria at the moment. It is available in 13 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Headhunters, and is it suitable for children?
Headhunters carries a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children; its relentless pursuit and increasingly dangerous situations make it a tense choice. The certificate indicates material intended for viewers aged 15 and over, while we find the cruel humour and convincing panic make the danger uncomfortable rather than merely playful.
How does Headhunters compare to After Hours?
Headhunters is the better fit for a tense criminal pursuit, while After Hours is our recommendation for unnerving comedy about an evening becoming unmanageable. Both find humour in an anxious man’s worsening predicament; we find Headhunters occasionally over-explains its plotting, whereas After Hours has a weakness in women who chiefly serve to frighten its protagonist.
Is Headhunters based on a true story or a book?
Headhunters is adapted from Jo Nesbø’s novel, rather than presented as a true story, with a screenplay by Lars Gudmestad and Ulf Rydberg. We find it works without prior knowledge of the book: Roger’s vanity, panic and improvised responses to danger give the thriller enough to hold our attention on their own.

Cast

Awards

European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film, 2012

Nominated
European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film

Saturn Awards, 2012

Won
Best International Film

The Amanda Public Choice Award, 2012

Won
The Amanda Public Choice Award

Silver nugget for the best Norwegian film, 2011

Won
Silver nugget for the best Norwegian film

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Silent Partner (1978) · not on Fi1m yetAnother compromised opportunist discovers that his opponent takes crime rather seriously.

  2. A Hard Day (2014) · not on Fi1m yetMore desperate improvisation, with each attempted solution creating a nastier practical problem.

  3. The Aura (2005) · not on Fi1m yetFor the criminal planning, with less comedy and more patient unease.

  4. After Hours (1985, Fi1m 80)Another anxious man discovers how quickly an evening can become unmanageable.

  5. Tell No One (2006) · not on Fi1m yetA more emotional pursuit thriller, with similarly persuasive momentum through complicated plotting.