Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) faces a forested landscape, her enormous black wings spread wide
Film review

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil

2019 · Directed by Joachim Rønning · 1h 59m

In a sentenceAngelina Jolie and Michelle Pfeiffer could settle this themselves, if the computer-generated armies would give them a minute

Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) faces a royal opponent in Queen Ingrith (Michelle Pfeiffer), whose pursuit draws the winged figure into conflict. Princess Aurora (Elle Fanning), Prince Phillip (Harris Dickinson) and King John (Robert Lindsay) also inhabit this fairy-tale world. The queen is surrounded by elaborate clothes, jewels and castle attendants; beyond the court lies a realm of fairies. Maleficent must resist Ingrith’s hostility as their personal confrontation becomes part of a wider struggle between royal and magical powers. The two women have little inclination to accommodate each other, and their dispute reaches beyond the castle.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Angelina Jolie and Michelle Pfeiffer make their hostility entertaining, but this crowded fantasy keeps finding less interesting things to do. The costumes and fairyland offer passing pleasures; the muddled story does not earn its scale.

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil has two actors worth watching and an unfortunate determination to keep us looking elsewhere. Joachim Rønning’s fantasy gives Angelina Jolie a formidable adversary in Michelle Pfeiffer, then crowds their confrontation with enough magical business to make both seem underused. There is some pleasure here for anyone who enjoys a queen being unpleasant in elaborate clothes. We would struggle to recommend 119 minutes on that basis, particularly when the film works so hard to dilute its principal attraction.

As Maleficent, Angelina Jolie can be fearsome without giving up the comedy. The performance understands how funny such a figure can be without making her harmless. Michelle Pfeiffer’s Queen Ingrith supplies the right amount of malice, and their exchanges make cruelty briefly entertaining. We laughed at their mutual hostility, because both actors let us enjoy the bad behaviour without asking us to mistake it for charm.

Elle Fanning brings commitment to Princess Aurora, though the writing gives that commitment too little support. The screenplay, credited to Noah Harpster, Micah Fitzerman-Blue and Linda Woolverton, keeps widening the fairy-tale world while leaving its central conflict blunt. Its familiar turns would be less troublesome if the film allowed more time for the personalities already making them interesting. Too often, another stretch of fantasy spectacle arrives instead, and the actors have to compete for our attention with things that cannot answer back.

Patrick Tatopoulos’s production design gives the fairy realm enough strangeness to justify a little sightseeing. There are places here that deserve more attention than the busy storytelling allows them. Ellen Mirojnick’s elaborate costumes are a more dependable pleasure, particularly on a queen whose jewellery hardly softens her nastiness. Henry Braham’s underwater images also offer a welcome change from the crowded spectacle. Those passages allow the eye to settle, which becomes a considerable relief amid so many effects.

Laura Jennings and Craig Wood’s editing does not find a steady rhythm between the harsh fantasy conflict and the child-friendly silliness. The shifts keep breaking the tension, making it difficult to know how much weight to give the danger. Geoff Zanelli’s music cannot make those moods feel as though they belong to one story. However much energy the film expends, it rarely sustains a feeling long enough for us to become involved in what happens to anyone beyond the leading women.

A family fantasy can be frightening, and there is no reason to demand that its dangers remain tidy. The problem is the film’s uncertainty about how seriously to take them: the darker material and the comic distractions seem to belong to different evenings. We found the repeated changes of mood tiring, because the silliness keeps interrupting the unease the harsher passages have established. Its PG certificate should not be mistaken for a promise of gentleness.

Fairy tales can unsettle with a single difficult character, and Angelina Jolie supplies one here. Turning so much attention towards computer-generated conflict makes the film feel more ordinary, despite all the extra creatures and scenery. The performances and peculiar sights provide occasional rewards, but the story gives us little reason to stay interested between them. Anyone coming chiefly for Angelina Jolie should be prepared to spend a fair amount of the evening waiting.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

47
Positive
2
Mixed
11
Negative
11

The consensus on Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is mixed to negative, with most critics finding more to enjoy in its cast than its storytelling. Praise centres on Angelina Jolie’s commanding, camp performance and Michelle Pfeiffer’s relish for villainy, particularly when the two share the screen. Even several unfavourable reviews find pleasures in the costumes, fantasy settings and visual effects, though these rarely compensate for what critics describe as an overcrowded, poorly focused sequel.

The main reservations concern muddled plotting, uneven tone and spectacle that leaves Maleficent herself with too little to do. The spread is wide: Eye for Film offers an enthusiastic dissent, praising the excitement and women-led story while finding it less moving than its predecessor. Variety takes a sharply opposing view, finding the fantasy warfare oppressive and Jolie’s character sidelined. Elsewhere, critics divide over whether the expanded fairy world supplies welcome invention or merely adds distractions.

Empire
15 October 2019 · Helen O'Hara
65*

O’Hara finds the sequel an improvement, though it remains overstuffed and too busy to match its leading lady. She praises Michelle Pfeiffer’s compelling villain and the film’s beautifully orchestrated finale.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 October 2019 · Tim Grierson
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its standfirst highlights Jolie’s return and Pfeiffer’s pursuit.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 October 2019
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
15 October 2019 · C+ · Eric Kohn
63

Kohn finds the film’s story heavy-handed and familiar, though its visual spectacle offers some appeal. He singles out Angelina Jolie’s flamboyant, fearsome performance as the movie’s strongest feature.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
18 October 2019 · ★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
60

O'Sullivan finds the sequel enjoyable but uneven, concluding it avoids ruining a brilliant character. She praises the gorgeous underwater shots and the film’s nightmare-like depiction of fairies being slaughtered.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 October 2019 · ★★★ · Tomris Laffly
60

The critic finds the sequel overstuffed but sees a worthy reason for it to exist. They single out the head-to-head between Michelle Pfeiffer and Angelina Jolie.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Maleficent: Mistress of Evil worth watching?
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil offers entertaining hostility from Angelina Jolie and Michelle Pfeiffer, but we struggle to recommend its muddled fantasy spectacle and score it 46 out of 100. The costumes and strange fairyland sights may please devoted fantasy viewers, though anyone coming chiefly for the leading women faces long stretches of computer-generated conflict between their exchanges.
How long is Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, and what is it rated?
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil runs 1h 59m. It is a family and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Maleficent: Mistress of Evil in South Africa?
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is available to rent from Apple TV from R34.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Maleficent: Mistress of Evil compare to The Witches?
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is the weaker choice beside The Witches, which we recommend for its darker humour and firmer sense of mischief. Both offer imposing antagonists, but Jolie and Pfeiffer compete with crowded spectacle, while Anjelica Huston’s delighted cruelty carries the funny, frightening The Witches, despite its slow start and softened nastiness.
What should I watch after Maleficent: Mistress of Evil?
After Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, try The Witches (1990, Fi1m 82): Another imposing antagonist, with darker humour and a firmer sense of mischief. Then Stardust (2007, Fi1m 75): Royal scheming and magical creatures, handled with more warmth and comic assurance; and Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88): Human power confronts a magical natural world, with the moral complications left intact.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Witches (1990, Fi1m 82)Another imposing antagonist, with darker humour and a firmer sense of mischief.

  2. Beauty and the Beast (1946) · not reviewed yetFor fairy-tale creatures whose strange surroundings deepen the feeling rather than distract.

  3. Stardust (2007, Fi1m 75)Royal scheming and magical creatures, handled with more warmth and comic assurance.

  4. Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88)Human power confronts a magical natural world, with the moral complications left intact.

  5. Tale of Tales (2015) · not reviewed yetA harsher fairy-tale option for adults, full of royal appetites and unsettling creatures.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever