Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox) examines his teeth in a mirror, startled by his reflection
Film review

Teen Wolf

1985 · Directed by Rod Daniel · 1h 32m

In a sentenceThe leading man does the charming while the extra body hair is left to do most of the comedy

In a small town, Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox) wants to be special. Puberty brings a change he has not expected: he is becoming a werewolf. Harold Howard (James Hampton), Boof (Susan Ursitti) and Stiles (Jerry Levine) share Scott’s story as he faces a problem beyond the ordinary discomforts of growing up. His wish to be different now comes with a secret to keep. Teenage romance, embarrassment and a changing body complicate the prospect of standing out for the right reasons.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Michael J. Fox is likeable in a werewolf comedy that runs short of good jokes. The puberty premise promises mischief, but the script settles too readily for familiar teenage worries.

Rod Daniel’s Teen Wolf has a promising explanation for the indignities of puberty: perhaps the extra hair really does mean something. Scott Howard wants to be special, and Michael J. Fox makes that wish seem understandable without making it especially noble. There is a pleasant comedy in that combination, though this one finds too few jokes to sustain it. At 92 minutes, it still has stretches where we wait for the writing to catch up with its leading man.

We were fond of Scott sooner than we expected. Michael J. Fox gives his dissatisfaction enough awkwardness to make it recognisable, so his longing to be different does not simply look like ingratitude. That matters in a comedy about wanting attention, which can become tiresome company if the central performance demands too much sympathy. His charm keeps the embarrassment tolerable, but it cannot supply the sharper comic consequences that Matthew Weisman and Jeph Loeb’s screenplay needs.

The writers have chosen an effective physical joke: a teenager’s changing body becomes harder to overlook. The trouble is how quickly the possibilities begin to narrow. We wanted more awkwardness, more surprise and a clearer sense of why Scott’s wish to stand out is so urgent; too often, merely recognising an adolescent worry is treated as enough. The romance adds another familiar concern without giving the comedy much more to work with.

James Hampton, Susan Ursitti and Jerry Levine have less room to make an impression around Michael J. Fox. The supporting performances are not objectionable, and there is some comfort in the film’s lack of cruelty towards its characters. But the imbalance matters: a teenage comedy needs other people to be funny, awkward or surprising on their own terms. Here we keep waiting for the attention to return to Scott.

Tim Suhrstedt’s cinematography gives the small-town setting a plainness that suits Scott’s dissatisfaction. Chester Kaczenski’s production design reinforces that ordinariness, giving the fantasy recognisable surroundings without adding much comic interest of its own. That is a sensible approach for an amiable comedy, but the familiarity gives the film little help when the jokes weaken. Rod Daniel keeps the tone approachable, although we wished he would risk making it stranger.

Lois Freeman-Fox’s editing makes the comedy easy to follow, although it cannot disguise how little some of it develops. Miles Goodman’s music fits the film’s genial manner without doing much to distinguish it. Neither contribution is a serious obstacle to enjoying the film; the shortage is in the comic writing. Once the novelty of a teenager becoming a werewolf has registered, the film needs something beyond another reason for him to feel conspicuous.

As a fantasy, Teen Wolf does not need to be frightening, and judging it for failing to be a horror film would miss the point. As a teenage comedy, it does need to make the familiar business of wanting attention feel freshly observed. Michael J. Fox supplies enough warmth to keep it watchable, but the laughs remain too scattered for a recommendation. Choose it only if his company matters more tonight than a reliable supply of jokes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

46
Positive
0
Mixed
2
Negative
2
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
65*

Smith finds the comedy less charming than Fox’s later films but still diverting. He singles out its amusing premise of puberty arriving with werewolfism.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 August 1985 · Janet Maslin
63*

The page does not reveal the critic’s verdict or specific observations. The URL identifies a New York Times review of the 1985 film, but the article text is inaccessible.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DO
30*

The available text suggests a dismissive verdict, contrasting the film unfavorably with Blue Velvet. It singles out the small-town setting and dark-secret premise, but the rest of the review is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984 · Variety Staff
25*

The review finds the film well-intentioned but terribly feeble. It singles out Michael J. Fox as likeable, contrasting him with the lackluster supporting cast.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Teen Wolf worth watching?
Teen Wolf is watchable for Michael J. Fox’s charm, but we score it 55 because the jokes are too scattered to recommend it. His awkward, likeable performance gives the teenage werewolf premise some warmth; choose it only if his company matters more than a reliably funny comedy.
How long is Teen Wolf, and what is it rated?
Teen Wolf runs 1h 32m. It is a comedy and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Teen Wolf in Romania?
Teen Wolf is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in Romania, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from lei 10.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Teen Wolf compare to Wolf Children?
Teen Wolf offers amiable teenage embarrassment, but we recommend Wolf Children as the better, gentler transformation story. Where Teen Wolf relies on Michael J. Fox to compensate for thin jokes, Wolf Children gives its growing children and their mother more patient attention, though we wish it asked more about what the mother wants for herself.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Gregory's Girl (1981) · not reviewed yetTeenage embarrassment and misplaced confidence, handled with more patience and better jokes.

  2. Turning Red (2022) · not reviewed yetAnother adolescent transformation, with family embarrassment given considerably more comic attention.

  3. Ginger Snaps (2000) · not reviewed yetFor a harsher, bloodier account of puberty arriving with unwelcome extra hair.

  4. Wolf Children (2012, Fi1m 81)A gentler transformation story, with time for both growing children and their mother.

  5. The Nutty Professor (1963) · not reviewed yetA comic transformation that also asks who gets liked, and for what.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever