Film review

Amy

2015 · Directed by Asif Kapadia · 2h 08m · MPA R

In a sentenceWe would happily have spent another hour in the studio with Amy Winehouse

DocumentaryMusic

In home-video footage, a teenage Amy Winehouse (herself, in archive footage) sings Happy Birthday. Amy follows her towards a recording career, bringing together private recordings, performances and her own words with recollections from Juliette Ashby (herself) and Nick Shymansky (himself). She wants to sing and write, while the attention her voice attracts begins to put demands on the rest of her life. The early footage catches her humour as well as her singing, before public appearances start to crowd the picture. Her story emerges through these recordings, with contributors heard rather than seen.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Asif Kapadia gives Amy Winehouse room to be funny and absorbed in music. His documentary is deeply moving, although we wanted more about her work and less about the people watching her.

Amy is a moving, carefully assembled documentary that gives Amy Winehouse room to be funny and musically alert before concern for her takes over. Asif Kapadia wants us to pay attention to the singer as well as the scrutiny surrounding her, and for much of the film he succeeds. The reservation is that the scrutiny eventually gets more attention than the singing. Even so, this is a portrait we recommend, particularly to anyone who knows the public image better than the voice.

The home videos establish how much the public image misses. We were moved by the teenage birthday performance, because the singing is so assured and the occasion so ordinary. Cinematographers Ernesto Herrmann and Jake Clennell are credited, but the most persuasive images here are those private recordings, whose informality lets us notice humour and ease alongside ability. The footage is valuable because it gives her something to do besides illustrate the trouble ahead.

Chris King’s editing brings those recordings together with performances and interviews heard rather than shown. Keeping the contributors off screen means we can listen to their recollections without repeatedly interrupting the archive footage. It is a useful discipline, although an unseen speaker can sound more authoritative than a person we can observe and question. The film flows with considerable confidence, and we occasionally wanted it to leave a little more doubt around someone else’s account.

The recording footage with Mark Ronson makes a strong case for spending longer on the work. Watching her perform gives us a clearer sense of musical judgement than any description of talent can, and her own lyrics help keep her words in the film. Antonio Pinto’s score is less useful when it presses towards sadness that the footage has already earned. We wanted more space to listen to her singing without having our response anticipated for us.

That is also the main weakness of the wider structure. As public and media intrusion occupy more of the film, the account of an artist starts to narrow into a study of what other people demand from her. The pressure is important, and the archive makes it difficult to dismiss, but it does not explain how she shapes a performance or turns experience into a song. At 128 minutes, there is room to ask more of those questions.

There is an awkwardness, too, in being given access to so much private material while being asked to think about the damage done by watching. The director cannot entirely settle that by treating his subject more kindly than the coverage he includes. What helps is the early footage, where her wit keeps disrupting the temptation to see her only as vulnerable. It is harder to feel comfortably protective towards someone who is plainly capable of making us laugh.

As a music documentary, Amy is strongest when it trusts a performance to hold our attention without explanation. As a portrait, it has the good sense to preserve the humour as well as the distress, which stops its subject becoming merely someone to feel sorry for. Watch it for the singer, and allow some patience for the film’s greater interest in everyone around her.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
16
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics find Asif Kapadia’s documentary an intimate, deeply affecting portrait that restores Amy Winehouse’s wit, personality and musical talent after years of tabloid scrutiny. Praise centres on the home videos, performance footage and audio-only interviews, which let her voice carry much of the story without conventional talking heads. The reviews largely credit this approach with making her troubles painful to witness without treating them as spectacle.

The disagreement concerns how far that sympathy allows for complexity, and whether the attention to celebrity crowds out the music. Vulture finds more attention paid to fame’s destructive effects than to the roots of Winehouse’s art, while Slant Magazine objects to the later sections’ moralising about fame and fandom. Most assessments remain positive despite such reservations; Little White Lies offers a sharper dissent, finding the film melodramatic and opportunistic, with too little insight into her interior life.

Film Comment
1 July 2015 · Jonathan Romney
85*

The film is an intelligent, empathetic and very moving account of a formidable talent and radiantly original personality. It inventories the gawkers and vultures around Winehouse while celebrating her joie de vivre.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
2 July 2015 · Kenneth Turan
85*

The critic praises the film as an accomplished, quietly devastating documentary that allows viewers to live Winehouse's life through its innovative audio-only interview technique and rich archival material. It singles out the portrayal of her extraordinary musical gift alongside the squandering of her talent.

Read the full review →
The Independent
2 July 2015
85*

The critic calls Kapadia’s film brilliant and praises its refusal to assign simple blame for Winehouse’s death. It highlights the wealth of home-movie footage, archive material and interviews that trace her life from precocious teenager to tragic decline.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 July 2015 · B+ · Kyle Ryan
83

The film offers a smart, nuanced look at Winehouse’s brief life, remaining grounded in her humanity through archival footage and voiceover interviews rather than salacious details. It praises Kapadia for treating the subject with respect and heart instead of turning it into an exploitative true-crime story.

Read the full review →
Empire
2 November 2015 · Phil de Semlyen
80*

Kapadia’s documentary is described as vibrant and haunting, peeling back tabloid preconceptions with forensic home-video footage and research to reveal a more complex character. It commends the film’s light touch that lets viewers draw their own conclusions about the tragedy.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 June 2015 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The review calls it a shattering and sensitive documentary that gives equal weight to Winehouse's talent and tragedy, refusing easy answers and capturing her personality and music powerfully.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2016

Won
Best Documentary Feature Film

European Film Award for Best Documentary, 2015

Won
European Film Award for Best Documentary

If you liked this, try…

What Happened, Miss Simone? poster

What Happened, Miss Simone?

2015 · Another singer’s work and private struggles, with more room for political conviction.

The Devil and Daniel Johnston poster

The Devil and Daniel Johnston

2005 · A musician’s homemade recordings open a difficult, affectionate account of creativity and illness.

Buena Vista Social Club poster

Buena Vista Social Club

1999 · The pleasure of watching musicians work together gets the time it deserves.

Pina poster

Pina

2011 · For another documentary that understands how much artists can tell us through performance.

Monterey Pop poster

Monterey Pop

1968 · When the explanations have worn thin, spend an evening listening to the performances.