Carol (Lauren Lapkus) and Zach Galifianakis sit facing each other across an interview table
Film review

Between Two Ferns: The Movie

2019 · Directed by Scott Aukerman · 1h 22m

In a sentenceWe would rather be insulted by Zach Galifianakis than hear about his travel arrangements

Zach Galifianakis (Zach Galifianakis) takes his celebrity-interview programme on the road. Carol (Lauren Lapkus), Cam (Ryan Gaul) and Boom Boom (Jiavani) accompany him as he meets famous guests for a series of conversations. He has questions to ask, but his awkward manner leaves little room for talk-show courtesies. The questions turn into insults, and the guests find themselves drawn into uncomfortable exchanges rather than polite conversation. Between interviews, the host and his companions continue their journey, sharing the business of travelling together as well as the encounters with celebrities.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Zach Galifianakis gets some good laughs from the celebrity interviews, and Lauren Lapkus makes welcome company. The thin road-trip story is harder work: this is a decent comedy for those already fond of its host’s bad manners.

The pleasure of Between Two Ferns: The Movie is watching a celebrity receive a question no polite interviewer would ask. There are enough good insults here for a decent comedy, particularly for existing admirers, but the road trip is persistently thin. Director Scott Aukerman and fellow writer Zach Galifianakis never quite find enough for their host to do between guests. At 82 minutes, it still gives us too much time to think about the distance to the next interview.

Zach Galifianakis understands how much of the joke belongs to the person receiving the insult. His awkwardness makes even a simple exchange feel like work, and he is good at suggesting that any offence is the guest’s problem. We laughed hardest at the back-and-forth with David Letterman, whose replies give the host some resistance. That exchange lets both comic personalities contribute without a plot pushing them along.

Lauren Lapkus gives the travelling company much of its appeal. As Carol, she is an engaging presence even when the writing supplies little to make the crew worth following between interviews. Ryan Gaul’s Cam and Jiavani’s Boom Boom have less to work with; the group never acquires enough comic friction to sustain a separate story. We keep waiting for the companions to become as interesting together as the host is when someone sits opposite him.

Benjamin Kasulke’s cinematography is most effective when it simply allows us to examine the people enduring these conversations. Susie Mancini’s production design feels appropriately modest, keeping the attention on faces rather than surroundings. There is no need for the film to look grander because it has become longer. The trouble is that the travel passages offer little visual pleasure to compensate for the weaker material.

Hank Friedmann and Brendan Walsh cut the interviews briskly, sometimes too briskly for embarrassment to develop into anything more uncomfortable than a quick joke. The insults land, but the pauses need room as well, especially when a guest is capable of answering back. Alex Wurman’s music is unobtrusive, and its restraint is welcome when the verbal sparring supplies so much of the pleasure. It cannot do much for the stretches in which the script is merely moving its people onwards.

Scott Aukerman and Zach Galifianakis seem less certain about what anyone should do away from an interview. The road-trip structure provides opportunities for fresh encounters, but too many connective scenes establish a story we have little reason to care about. Some of the absurdity works because it is so casually offered; elsewhere, the effort to manufacture another comic incident shows. A talk-show parody needs a host and somebody willing to endure him, and these encounters already contain plenty to explore.

The guests’ willingness to look foolish keeps the film from feeling spiteful. Anyone expecting an assault on celebrity culture may find the company too agreeable, since the famous faces are willing participants in the joke. That friendliness will matter more than the story to viewers who already like the host. Save it for an evening when nobody needs much of a plot.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

59
Positive
5
Mixed
5
Negative
2

The reviews are mixed, with broad agreement that Between Two Ferns: The Movie is funniest when it sticks to celebrity interviews. Critics repeatedly praise the insults, the guests’ willingness to join in and Zach Galifianakis’s awkward comic manner. Lauren Lapkus also draws praise for her supporting performance. Even several less enthusiastic reviews find laughs in the encounters, though agreement on individual jokes does not extend to the film as a whole.

The main reservation is the road-trip story, which many find thin, padded or too weak to justify expanding the original format. The spread is wide: Den of Geek finds the comedy consistently funny despite a formulaic structure, while Vulture argues that the shortened interviews lose the original show’s awkward tension. More favourable reviews accept the slight plot as a tolerable cost of the comedy; detractors find too little beyond the familiar routine to sustain a feature.

The AV Club
20 September 2019 · B · William Hughes
77

Hughes finds the film deeply funny but less subversive and more meandering than the original series. He praises Lauren Lapkus and the cast’s comic riffs, especially when the film embraces absurdity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 September 2019
64*

The accessible page text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no readable praise or complaint to summarize.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
21 September 2019 · C+ · Ben Travers
63

Travers finds the film serviceable but unable to justify turning the web series into a feature. He praises several sharp celebrity interviews, while criticizing the road-trip plot and forced bits.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 September 2019 · Benjamin Lee
60*

The critic finds the film intermittently funny but featherweight and often forgettable. The celebrity interviews and their unrestrained insults are the funniest parts, while the road-trip plot feels like filler.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 September 2019 · Robyn Bahr
45*

Bahr finds the film’s thin road-trip story weakens the original comedy’s premise, despite its laugh-out-loud moments. She especially praises the celebrity interviews, singling out David Letterman’s sharp back-and-forth with Galifianakis.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 September 2019 · Owen Gleiberman
45*

Gleiberman finds the film amusing in spots but ultimately a tossed-together, room-temperature hangout movie. He singles out Lauren Lapkus as a magnetic comic standout.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Between Two Ferns: The Movie worth watching?
Between Two Ferns: The Movie is a decent comedy for existing admirers of Zach Galifianakis’s awkward insults; we score it 62 out of 100. The celebrity interviews supply the strongest laughs, and Lauren Lapkus is welcome company, but the thin road-trip story makes the gaps between guests feel longer than they should.
How long is Between Two Ferns: The Movie, and what is it rated?
Between Two Ferns: The Movie runs 1h 22m. It is a comedy film.
Where can I watch Between Two Ferns: The Movie in Thailand?
Between Two Ferns: The Movie is streaming on Netflix in Thailand. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Between Two Ferns: The Movie, and is it suitable for children?
Between Two Ferns: The Movie carries a US R rating and has no UK certificate supplied here, so we would not recommend it for children. Its comedy centres on insults and uncomfortable celebrity exchanges; the R rating signals adult material, but we have no specific violence or frightening content to flag.
How does Between Two Ferns: The Movie compare to This Is Spinal Tap?
Between Two Ferns: The Movie is the narrower recommendation beside This Is Spinal Tap, whose patient performances and carefully crafted songs make it the stronger comedy. Both find humour in pompous public performers who cannot recognise their own absurdity, but we recommend Spinal Tap more widely; Between Two Ferns chiefly suits those already fond of its host.
What should I watch after Between Two Ferns: The Movie?
After Between Two Ferns: The Movie, try This Is Spinal Tap (1984, Fi1m 91): Another pompous public performance undone by people who cannot recognise their own absurdity. Then Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86): For awkward encounters allowed enough time to become funny, painful and unexpectedly tender.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. This Is Spinal Tap (1984, Fi1m 91)Another pompous public performance undone by people who cannot recognise their own absurdity.

  2. The Trip (2010) · not on Fi1m yetCompeting comic egos make the travelling itself worth staying for.

  3. Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86)For awkward encounters allowed enough time to become funny, painful and unexpectedly tender.

  4. What We Do in the Shadows (2014) · not on Fi1m yetA deadpan ensemble whose petty disagreements give the documentary pretence something to do.

  5. The Dinner Game (1998) · not on Fi1m yetThe insults acquire consequences in a comedy with considerably firmer plotting.