Two firemen in helmets brace a hose nozzle inside a darkened building
Film review

Fires Were Started

1943 · Directed by Humphrey Jennings · 1h 10m

In a sentenceSeventy minutes with a fire crew, and the man at the piano stays with us

During wartime, Walters (Phillip Wilson-Dickson), Dykes (George Gravett) and Johnny Daniels (Fred Griffiths) work among a crew of firefighters. Their job brings them into danger together and requires them to rely on one another. Away from the fires, the men spend time in each other’s company, and a fireman played by William Sansom sits at the piano. The story follows their shared working life, where the immediate task of fighting fires goes alongside the everyday business of getting along with the people doing the job.

Fi1m review

Humphrey Jennings makes the companionship of a wartime fire crew quietly moving. We learn little about individual lives, but the performances and precise editing give us good reason to care about the men doing the work.

Fires Were Started asks us to spend time with a fire crew and take their work seriously. Humphrey Jennings, who writes and directs, finds enough in their companionship to make a war drama without forcing every man to explain what he represents. We recommend it warmly, with a reservation about how little we learn of some individuals. At 70 minutes, it gives the group more attention than any single personal story.

Phillip Wilson-Dickson plays Walters, George Gravett plays Dykes and Fred Griffiths plays Johnny Daniels. They make a convincing company, and the pleasure comes from watching people become comfortable together without any performance demanding special attention. We believe that these men could depend on one another when they have to. Their ease together establishes that confidence, without making every exchange announce the importance of comradeship.

William Sansom’s fireman at the piano matters to this. We were moved by that ordinary pleasure among men whose work exposes them to danger. There is nothing grand about someone making music for company, and the film has the sense to let it matter without labouring the point. It becomes easier to care what happens to the firefighters once we have spent some undemanding time with them.

C.M. Pennington-Richards’s cinematography serves the crew well: the firefighting holds our attention without making the people doing it seem incidental. We remain interested in the men, even when there is plenty else to look at. Stewart McAllister’s editing is particularly good at sustaining that attention; the film has pace without treating time spent together as an interruption. We have room to register the relationships. That helps the firefighting remain free of melodrama while still giving us reason to worry.

William Alwyn’s music contributes to the feeling without overwhelming the men, though the piano player is what we remember most clearly. A more insistent score could easily have made this account of ordinary courage feel overbearing. The music leaves enough room for us to respond to the firefighters without feeling that admiration is compulsory. That restraint suits a film whose performances already give us much of what we need.

The limitation is that we sometimes want to know more about a particular man than the film has room to tell us. The cast convince us that lives extend beyond the job, but those lives remain lightly sketched. The choice makes sense for a short film about a crew, though we occasionally wished a conversation could continue beyond what it tells us about the group. The warmth does not quite remove that frustration.

As a war drama, it puts considerable trust in people doing necessary work together. There is courage here, but the director does not keep stopping to point at it, and the lack of fuss makes the danger more persuasive. Anyone looking for a single commanding hero may find the attention too widely shared. Give the quieter passages as much attention as the fires; the man at the piano has earned his place.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

81
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
0
The Guardian
25 February 1999 · Derek Malcolm
95*

Malcolm calls the film a masterpiece and praises its intimate, unsentimental portrait of wartime fire crews. He especially singles out the lifelike characters and the remarkably unmelodramatic firefighting scenes.

Read the full review →
Empire
5 April 2006 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson considers the film an enduring, impeccably paced achievement. He praises its precise editing and poetic, authentic portrayal of ordinary firefighters facing danger together.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Parkinson regards it as one of the finest British Home Front films, praising its restrained simplicity. He singles out the firefighters’ convincing camaraderie and quiet heroism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· RMy
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review but provides no critic's verdict. Its description singles out the film's near loss to Ministry of Information publicity cuts.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Fires Were Started worth watching?
Fires Were Started is warmly worth watching for its convincing fire crew and quietly moving companionship; we score it 85 out of 100. Its 70 minutes give more attention to the group than to individual lives, which can frustrate, but we find the ordinary pleasure of a fireman playing the piano as affecting as the danger of the work.
How long is Fires Were Started, and what is it rated?
Fires Were Started runs 1h 10m. It is a drama and war film.
Where can I watch Fires Were Started in Bulgaria?
Fires Were Started is not on any streaming or rental service in Bulgaria at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Fires Were Started, and is it suitable for children?
Fires Were Started contains wartime firefighting and persuasive danger, but no UK or US certificate is supplied, so we cannot give a firm age recommendation for children. We find the threat affecting because we care about the crew, rather than because Jennings forces the drama; that danger is the main consideration for younger or sensitive viewers.
How does Fires Were Started compare to The Wages of Fear?
Fires Were Started is the better choice for quiet companionship, while The Wages of Fear suits those after a hard, patient thriller about dangerous work. We recommend both for their attention to men relying on practical skill and one another, but Jennings keeps the shared working life central, whereas Clouzot makes a truckload of nitroglycerine frightening, after a testing wait in town.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Listen to Britain (1942) · not on Fi1m yetEveryday wartime lives receive patient attention, with music doing much of the talking.

  2. The Small Back Room (1949) · not on Fi1m yetMore wartime work under pressure, with closer attention to one troubled man.

  3. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)Men depend on practical skill and one another when dangerous work offers little mercy.

  4. The Firemen's Ball (1967) · not on Fi1m yetA less reassuring fire brigade, observed through small vanities and mounting social embarrassment.

  5. Dersu Uzala (1975) · not on Fi1m yetPatient companionship and practical knowledge matter when the natural world becomes dangerous.

Fires Were Started (1943) review: A fire crew well worth knowing (Bulgaria) | Fi1m