Calvin Bouchard (Louis Gossett Jr.), Mike Brody (Dennis Quaid) and Philip FitzRoyce (Simon MacCorkindale) inspect a park model
Film review

Jaws 3-D

1983 · Directed by Joe Alves · 1h 38m

In a sentenceA shark at Sea World, and somehow the people are the exhausting part

Sea World is the setting as Mike Brody (Dennis Quaid), Dr. Kathryn Morgan (Bess Armstrong) and Calvin Bouchard (Louis Gossett Jr.) confront a shark threat. The marine park has an opening ceremony to stage and people to keep safe, with danger in the water where visitors expect a display. Philip FitzRoyce (Simon MacCorkindale) and Sean Brody (John Putch) are also involved. Around the attraction, the business of showing marine life to the public becomes a question of keeping the public away from it.

Fi1m review

Joe Alves’s shark sequel has a useful marine-park setting and a willing cast, but the dull relationships and feeble suspense wear us down. The attacks offer too little relief.

Joe Alves’s Jaws 3-D has a sensible place to put a shark and disappointingly little idea what to do with it. A marine park ought to be useful territory for a thriller, since everyone arrives expecting the animals to be under control. Sea World gives this film that starting point, but the human drama keeps getting in the way of the danger. This is a poor sequel with occasional liveliness in the attacks, and a 98-minute running time that feels generous.

The screenplay by Richard Matheson and Carl Gottlieb spends too much time on relationships that give us little reason to care about the people involved. Dennis Quaid plays Mike Brody and Bess Armstrong plays Dr. Kathryn Morgan, and both are agreeable enough company when the writing lets them be. We were bored by their relationship scenes, because they delay the shark without making us more concerned for either person. Their conversations need more humour, or sharper disagreements, to justify how long we spend listening to them.

James A. Contner’s cinematography rarely makes us anxious about what might be outside the frame, a serious shortcoming in a shark film. The 3-D asks us to attend to what is coming towards us, but anticipation needs more than an effect aimed at the audience. Editors Corky Ehlers and Randy Roberts do little to make the stretches between attacks feel tense. Joe Alves also moves on from the great white too readily, so even the creature’s appearances can feel less satisfying than the wait promised.

Woods Mackintosh’s production design at least gives the marine attraction some appeal, and the setting remains an asset even when the story struggles. There is room here for the pleasure of exploring a place as well as the fear of what might be swimming through it. Alan Parker’s music supplies some urgency, although the score is too often left to encourage excitement that the scenes have not earned. Louis Gossett Jr., playing Calvin Bouchard, brings welcome energy; more of that energy in the writing would have helped.

The attacks provide the clearest evidence that this could have been an entertaining, undemanding thriller. For brief stretches the danger is immediate, the conversations stop taking priority and the shark gets the attention it deserves. We do not need elaborate psychology from a creature film, but we do need either people worth worrying about or suspense that can manage without them. Too much of Jaws 3-D passes without either, and the extra dimension does nothing to improve the pace.

This is not a sequel we would choose for a return visit, nor a promising place to begin with shark films. Its reputation for being poor should not be taken as a promise of an entertaining evening spent laughing at it. Dull stretches remain dull in company, and there are too many here to excuse as part of the fun. Reserve it for a completist evening, with company that will not object when the conversation starts.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

37
Positive
0
Mixed
2
Negative
3
The New York Times
23 July 1983 · Janet Maslin
62*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. The available page text contains only a JavaScript and ad-blocker notice.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DA
61*

The available description presents the film as a gimmicky new Jaws sequel, but the critic’s full verdict cannot be determined. It singles out the 3-D gimmick, while the article text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1982 · Variety Staff
20*

The critic judges this the Jaws cycle’s nadir, calling the 3-D installment surprisingly tepid. They fault director Joe Alves for not lingering long enough on the Great White shark.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
10*

Newman dismisses the film as a toothless, tedious farce. He particularly criticizes the revenge plot’s clumsy spectacle and the screenplay’s lack of energy.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 August 2013 · Jennie Kermode
30*

Kermode finds the film disappointing overall, with dull human drama and relationships undermining its potential. The shark attacks and a late breakthrough scene provide the strongest thrills.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Jaws 3-D worth watching?
Jaws 3-D is a poor shark sequel we would reserve for completists, and we score it 36/100. The marine-park setting has promise and the attacks offer occasional liveliness, but we find the dull relationships and feeble suspense too wearing to recommend it even as an evening of affectionate mockery.
How long is Jaws 3-D, and what is it rated?
Jaws 3-D runs 1h 38m. It is a thriller and horror film.
Where can I watch Jaws 3-D in Indonesia?
Jaws 3-D is not on any streaming or rental service in Indonesia at the moment. It is available in 46 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Jaws 3-D, and is it suitable for children?
Jaws 3-D carries a UK PG certificate and contains shark attacks and people in danger in the water, so parental judgement matters for younger children. We find the suspense weak, but the attacks provide brief stretches of immediate danger; children sensitive to sharks or water-based peril may still find those passages frightening.
How does Jaws 3-D compare to The Shallows?
Jaws 3-D is the weaker choice beside The Shallows, which we recommend for its leaner story and more effective scares. One swimmer and one shark keep the latter focused, while the marine-park sequel spends too long on uninteresting relationships. The finish of The Shallows is silly, but we find its sustained suspense much more rewarding.

Cast

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst New Star, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst New Star

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

If you liked this, try…

  1. Piranha (1978) · not reviewed yetA livelier aquatic menace, with humour that does not drain the danger.

  2. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetA river monster and a family whose company makes the waiting worthwhile.

  3. Black Water (2007) · not reviewed yetA smaller scale and a crocodile make the water frightening again.

  4. The Shallows (2016, Fi1m 82)One swimmer and one shark provide a welcome reduction in complications.

  5. Deep Blue Sea (1999) · not reviewed yetAnother enclosed aquatic setting, but with more pace and less ceremony.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever